I use PANDACrazy and Turkmaster. I use Turkmaster to keep track of requester I'm trying to qual for and to also keep up with different types of HITS, usually batches. I use PANDACrazy for pretty much everything. The only thing I'm not certain of with PANDACrazy is that it sometimes seems to catch less HIT's than Turkmaster. I'm not an impatient person, so how fast it happens is not really the problem - mostly the larger amount per day at least appears to be low with PANDA's.
I'm not really sure if PANDA's per day is even worth testing since it could be simply the fact that the requester hasn't posted another HIT of the same type and might not at all, at least not for a long while. I don't know. I'm still new to Mturk so I'm trying stuff to see if it's a 'thing' or not.
I've been using HIT Finder for about a week now, but I'm also using HIT Catcher, along with Turkmaster and PANDACrazy. Again, not an impatient person, I'm just not entirely sure if workload on the HIT searchers affect likelyhood of catching an HIT - i.e, how many should I even be keeping track of before it's just really ineffiecient?
Normally on stuff like this I wouldn't care - I'm not desperate for money but I also don't want to falsely believe in my progress when there really is none.
Edit: I also usually stop Turkmaster when I'm doing batches - way too many page errors otherwise.