Oh trust me first thing I did was msg them for a reversal.. Im so bored i was sitting here picking only the clear ones to do lol.. So i know its not wrong. I remember them rejecting some when I was new.. Prolly why i was hesitant on doing them in the first place.. Sigh..
Yeah if you made a survey asking people who gave them their first rejection P9R would probably be 50%+
Maybe it was 4. It's possible I'm confused, lol. I just know it said I was done and ready for completion code eventually
I HATE p9r for this very thing. When I started I could do many, no rejects. Then I got like 7 and they would not reverse nor repsond to my message. Worst requester I have encountered.
It wasn't bad since they give you 4 hours to complete, and it seemed much the same as the $8 ones we did last time.
AFAIK there are no internet points connected with being fast, but I guess that's a valid point. That's why I like being able to see the usernames so I can compare against users I trust/recognize. Very rarely have I had a time that's longer than what the average gives me, and I usually attribute that to different versions of a survey or something.
I would assume that you'd be faster than the general population, too.
I got a response, and they bonused me some extra pennies for my trouble, but they "couldn't" reverse the rejections.
Oh see...that's wrong. Who wants pennies when rejections are at stake? I did have one requester do something similar for a survey.I got a response, and they bonused me some extra pennies for my trouble, but they "couldn't" reverse the rejections.
It was ages ago. It's possible that they didn't have a clue how to do it. But obviously I'm still sour about it years later
I'm guessing almost half of my rejects came from them, so yes I am still bitter, too. lolIt was ages ago. It's possible that they didn't have a clue how to do it. But obviously I'm still sour about it years later
I think it was very similar to the $8 ones as well, in fact, it might have been a bit easier (but I won’t say that too loudly until I’m sure mine’s not rejected and I get the next one).
The only rejections I have are from them. I did them for numbers when I was below 1000 but looking back I wish I hadn't. I was super careful, only selected the clear ones and still ended up with 7 they wouldn't reverse. They reversed some but not all.
... just discredit them to being aliens....
Nah we know you don't scam.AFAIK there are no internet points connected with being fast, but I guess that's a valid point. That's why I like being able to see the usernames so I can compare against users I trust/recognize. Very rarely have I had a time that's longer than what the average gives me, and I usually attribute that to different versions of a survey or something.
I would assume that you'd be faster than the general population, too.
I thought people were complaining about the averages shown next to the HITs, when you only see one value. I assume that's the average, anyway? If you're looking at actual reviews on the website, it should be easy enough to see which users have crazy times and just discredit them to being aliens. I'd imagine it's the same people consistently.
I didn't mean to end up being a spokesperson, lol. I just know that I'm labeled as one of the crazy fast people and I don't scam. In fact, I've got two toddlers and a slew of animals constantly interrupting me. But I also don't generally review anything that's under $12/hour, so by default I'm probably artificially inflating the times because I don't review the slow stuff.
@ducky was saying the crazy, unreasonable times suck when it's the only review.
Exactly! Always that fear, especially at $16.
I think they are scam artists out for as many free pennies as they can gather.
