They had the same appeal that Copytext did to me, which is persistent batch, relatively quick payout, easy to understand. They win over Copytext because Copytext is mostly French receipts whereas A9's can get downright... bizarre and I like bizarre.
Understandable. To each his/her own.
Most of them are really quick to do, it's not about making a bunch of money from them, it's about getting your numbers up to the milestones and cushioning yourself from rejections.
When I was doing them over the weekend I had 5 tabs on rotation. I made $10 an hour & maxed at 3.8k after 6 hours ($75ish). It was def worth it to me.
I assume there's a way. But I refuse to look at them.
I've actually gotten rejections from them before. Just putting that out there.
| Title: Restaurant Search Result Survey | PANDA Requester: Victoria Sosik [A1OS6KSFJMJWD0] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 5.00 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 6 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: - Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 77 Reward: $1.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90;Location is US |
You can get a rejection from anything. I've gotten two rejections out of about 1,000 A9 hits, but that was the first week I started and I didn't know I could just throw back questionable hits. Now I just throw everything back that I'm unsure of. So, if it's asking if there is a shirt in there and I only see the collar of a shirt, I just throw the damned thing back. It's their own fault for not having examples.
Especially since there's a wikitor batch scheduled for 5 pm.
