- Joined
- Jul 8, 2016
- Messages
- 10,554
- Reaction score
- 23,278
- Points
- 1,738
- Age
- 34
- Gender
- Male
Oh thank goodness I caught a Gibson. I can do something else for a few minutes.
Just make sure you're not rejecting a wish because it doesn't have a question mark. "Please tell me how to reset my password" is the same as "Can you please tell me how to reset my password?" "I need to know whether this email is valid" is the same as "Would you tell me whether this email is valid?"
Yet the review HIT instructions don't say this at all. He hasn't replied to my email asking for clarification, either.That's exactly what I just said.
Yeah. I'm looking at it more of a spirit of the law type situation, then. Does this seem like a response that makes sense within the spirit of what he's suggesting? Then it's a good response.That's the way I've been doing them but the review hits say statements while the writing hits say questions.
the writing hit has a statement in the example.Yeah. I'm looking at it more of a spirit of the law type situation, then. Does this seem like a response that makes sense within the spirit of what he's suggesting? Then it's a good response.
I've opted for the .15 ones... but I'm not catching anyEric Sites still going strong I see
Literally 100's of the $1.00 nowI've opted for the .15 ones... but I'm not catching any
first batch should end up with a total of 7,000 per Sites. I emailed earlier to find out whether there was a limit on these.Literally 100's of the $1.00 now
You can do either. Over the course of these posting I've done about 150 and all have been separate questions, all approved. Someone contacted him today and said a string was fine as long as it wasn't garbage. Whatever you're more comfortable with.You're essentially writing up a script. Don't write 5 separate questions and answers that don't follow. each hit is a self contained flowing conversation. Even if an idea is similar, for instance, 2 hits are about a user who doesn't actually have account w/ that group, write up the Q & A a bit different. First question sets the tone. Follow from there.
They are paid really fastVerb To Be - AM/IS/ARE- Important. Geesh
Title: Receive $.5 for 5min academic survey about an anti-smoking CSR ad | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Hyejin Kim [A3FA773189O6S1] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 5] [ToS: 0] TO 2: Not Available Description: You will receive $.5 for your participation. We are conducting a brief academic survey about your thoughts regarding CSR ads. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US; |
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.10 |
Yeah, either are fine. Each as individual questions/answers and as an entire dialogue as one HIT are acceptable, too.You're essentially writing up a script. Don't write 5 separate questions and answers that don't follow. each hit is a self contained flowing conversation. Even if an idea is similar, for instance, 2 hits are about a user who doesn't actually have account w/ that group, write up the Q & A a bit different. First question sets the tone. Follow from there.
Yes, someone got an email from him that said that.Someone mentioned earlier that grammar/spelling are grounds for rejecting a question/statement right?
For the answers, yeah, because they need to appear very professional. As questions, there's more leeway.Someone mentioned earlier that grammar/spelling are grounds for rejecting a question/statement right?
Oh yes!, oh God YES!! Don't have any idea where people got that shit. ............... Drives me BATTY! I've finially found a "These/Those Soul Mate"!!! I actually correct people on this infraction/stupidity/dumb shit. { <------- I'm just a tad emotional about this ... maybe }Bugs the hell out of me when people write or say, these ones, or those ones. These or those would suffice.
Yes, I emailed Sites about this and he responded that yes it would be. The answers especially. The questions, not so much.Someone mentioned earlier that grammar/spelling are grounds for rejecting a question/statement right?