06/30 - Fried Friday!

[PhantomCatt]

Did you get a code on this one? Mine did not, alas, although my response has been recorded...

I didn't get a code either... just entered my turk ID and sent them a message.

 

[coffeeowl]

Title: Survey about what plays a video in an interface | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: UX mTurk [A2V0VNJT24UEKK] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 6] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $12.67/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 0% of 1] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 2] Description: - Time: 1 hour HITs Available: 30 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location EqualTo US;

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.10​

google

 

[Hotlamp]

Alright on the Survey about alcoholic beverage consumption

Did anyone else get a code? I did not. Did you just submit with your worker ID?

 

[Squatty]

*waves* hiiii

For you fancy folk who joined me in this prestigious group (aka lucker dogs who had nothing better to do last week) - I reached out to David because a bunch of work is flagged despite being correct because there's no screenshots and I was kinda confused if we should mark it as right or wrong.

I sent him (snipped for privacy):


His reply (emphasis mine):


Thought this might be helpful to anyone doing them since a lot of work is flagged for reasons other than the address actually being incorrect.

Hope everyone killed the qual round!

Not quite the same response that I received

New identification work costs a lot of time and money, so only send for new identification if the identification is just useless. (i.e., there's no way to know if they got the right address)

So I have only been marking them as insufficient if the listing has been removed and we have no way to prove the address.

 

[minkyboodle]

Me too

Having some trouble with my spoons lately ...

I'm sorry. :blueheart::greenheart:urpleheart: I would go steal us some spoons from Sam's but I'm too poor to afford the bail money. I hope that things even out for you soon. We'll get through this. I keep telling myself that I have slayed bigger dragons than this...which kind of helps.

More just showed @minkyboodle @PhantomCatt

I saw that. Thank you for the heads up!

 

[PhantomCatt]

Alright on the Survey about alcoholic beverage consumption

Did anyone else get a code? I did not. Did you just submit with your worker ID?

See my response about two posts above yours

 

[Pleco]

Nah man, the right answer is Popeye's. Take it or leave it.



Also I'm actually making fried chicken tonight, so you all can have some if you find your way to the East Coast.

Everyone get out of my effing way.

 

[MrTrentSD]

*waves* hiiii

For you fancy folk who joined me in this prestigious group (aka lucker dogs who had nothing better to do last week) - I reached out to David because a bunch of work is flagged despite being correct because there's no screenshots and I was kinda confused if we should mark it as right or wrong.

I sent him (snipped for privacy):


His reply (emphasis mine):


Thought this might be helpful to anyone doing them since a lot of work is flagged for reasons other than the address actually being incorrect.

Hope everyone killed the qual round!

I'll just leave this here...

 

[Squatty]

I'll just leave this here...

There is no evidence that the address matches that hotel such as a webpage or screenshot or anything.

 

[ChrisTurk]

Not quite the same response that I received

New identification work costs a lot of time and money, so only send for new identification if the identification is just useless. (i.e., there's no way to know if they got the right address)

So I have only been marking them as insufficient if the listing has been removed and we have no way to prove the address.

But if the listing is removed, why would you send them for revalidation? They can't be revalidated if they no longer exist can they? THIS IS SO CONFUSING! HAHAHA.

I'll just leave this here...

These are EXACTLY the ones I was emailing him about. Half of them the hotel is in the title, what more evidence did the person flagging it need? Lol.

 

[coffeeowl]

Title: Answer a survey about your consequences | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Duke Center for Behavioral Economics [A14RDIKJG0V5TD] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.06] [Fast: 4.23] [Comm: 3.11] [Fair: 4.36] [Reviews: 368] [ToS: 11] TO 2: [Rate: $5.50/hr] [Pen: 1.51 days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 50% of 8] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: Give us your opinion about different types of consequences Time: 1 hour HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 90; Location EqualTo US;

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.10​

About 1 min.

 

[TSolo315]

Tanner time :sleep2:

 

[PhantomCatt]

I'm sorry. :blueheart::greenheart:urpleheart: I would go steal us some spoons from Sam's but I'm too poor to afford the bail money. I hope that things even out for you soon. We'll get through this. I keep telling myself that I have slayed bigger dragons than this...which kind of helps.

I saw that. Thank you for the heads up!

I'm too poor to afford bail too. Things should get better as soon as my hubby starts bringing in more money. Thankfully he got a job at Bass Pro Shop, but he doesn't even start until July 14th. Until then the bulk of the bills are on me and we are like *this* close to an eviction. I keep trying to stay focused on my faith and the fact that I too have slain bigger dragons than this, but sometimes it's really trying... especially with some of my other family drama, their health (my dad, stepmom, and grandma inlaw are all literally on their death bed), my husband just being diagnosed bipolar and starting new meds, not to mention my own depression and anxiety battles.

Maybe we can go to a fast food restaurant and borrow some spoons? Lol... is that technically stealing? Trying to think outside the box now... desperate times and all...

 

[Kerek]

It's comforting that even years long projects with 100k+ turk budgets still have bad instructions.

 

[Squatty]

But if the listing is removed, why would you send them for revalidation? They can't be revalidated if they no longer exist can they? THIS IS SO CONFUSING! HAHAHA.

These are EXACTLY the ones I was emailing him about. Half of them the hotel is in the title, what more evidence did the person flagging it need? Lol.

He has the photos from the listing saved. Which is why we can still see the photos and host information when the listing has been removed.

Evidence like a photo of the front of the hotel or a pool or anything? Even just a link to a hotel webpage proving the address matches the hotel?

That type of lazy work is why someone kept putting the wrong address for "W Hotel" as 401 when if they just opened the listing they would see the address in the description s 3101 Bayshore because the "W Hotel" and the "W Residences" are not at the same address.

 

[MrTrentSD]

There is no evidence that the address matches that hotel such as a webpage or screenshot or anything.

All over the listing along with the NAME of the building. In order to question the original reviewer, you would have to be an idiot.

But if the listing is removed, why would you send them for revalidation? They can't be revalidated if they no longer exist can they? THIS IS SO CONFUSING! HAHAHA.

These are EXACTLY the ones I was emailing him about. Half of them the hotel is in the title, what more evidence did the person flagging it need? Lol.

I think there are people trying to get quals pulled from other people to get more work. smh.

 

[MrTrentSD]

@Squatty I just read what I wrote again, I want to make sure that I was not calling YOU and idiot.

 

[Squatty]

All over the listing along with the NAME of the building. In order to question the original reviewer, you would have to be an idiot.

I am not questioning that the name of the building is a match. I want proof that that hotel is at that address. Besides, "I just know it"

 

[PhantomCatt]

Time for a mental health break... Be back laters...

 

[Squatty]

@Squatty I just read what I wrote again, I want to make sure that I was not calling YOU and idiot.

It's ok, I understood you. And I can be an idiot