10/15 - Speedy Sunday!

[A6_Foul_Out]

Where are you supposed to write the sentences?

click all objects outlined in red and provide 1 sentence something something it's a box next to reason you have to confirm

 

[stuffalleysays]

I can't even see pinterest hits

 

[sudilly]

Title: Annotate videos of cars driving | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: globalworkforge [A2RCMN80FDD02G] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.40] [Fast: 4.83] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 22] [ToS: 0] TO 2: Not Available Reward: $0.50 Duration: 60 minutes Available: 488 Description: Annotate the video as per the instructions Requirements: Video annotation has been granted; Previous has not been granted;

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.25.7​

anybody who ended up getting this qual do these?

Not me -- requester said only 30% got it. I was extremely diligent on the qual, so if that didn't meet their standards its probably good that I didn't get itl

 

[Michele]

well they might be getting ready to repost another qual, i have seen requesters revoke before they get ready to post up new ones to revamp stuff, im sure if you got 93 through im sure you did fine, it seemed like they were kinda learning as they went

oh...now I'm really upset. I got a note back saying I made too many errors and had missing end, start and justifications...in general. This can't be right. I spent a loooong time, going over each of these like 10 to 15 minutes on most, and I am almost positive that I didn't have missing fields. I think there's been a mistake. Maybe I don't want to work with them now. This makes me so mad. I worked very hard on these, went over and over the times and I have a 99.9% approval rating so it's not like I'm a slouch. I think they have my ID mixed up with someone else's. I really think this is wrong... Ok...fine. Rant over. Hard not to let this mess up the day.

 

[Michele]

Not me -- requester said only 30% got it. I was extremely diligent on the qual, so if that didn't meet their standards its probably good that I didn't get itl

I believe you. There's something wrong here I think, so I doubt it was you. That's how I feel about the hits I did, and apparently, after 93 lol, they decided I wasn't good enough.

 

[coffeeowl]

oh...now I'm really upset. I got a note back saying I made too many errors and had missing end, start and justifications...in general. This can't be right. I spent a loooong time, going over each of these like 10 to 15 minutes on most, and I am almost positive that I didn't have missing fields. I think there's been a mistake. Maybe I don't want to work with them now. This makes me so mad. I worked very hard on these, went over and over the times and I have a 99.9% approval rating so it's not like I'm a slouch. I think they have my ID mixed up with someone else's. I really think this is wrong... Ok...fine. Rant over. Hard not to let this mess up the day.

Sorry to hear that.

 

[Bliss]

Title: For people interested in editing video | PANDA Requester: Johnson Fung [A3AOPX0AA0DXD0] (TO) TO Ratings: 3.00 Communicativity 3.43 Generosity 4.00 Fairness 4.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 7 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Survey about video editing (~3 minutes) Time: 4 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Masters has been granted

I have an A.S. degree in Graphic Design. I have taken college classes on Adobe Premiere and Final Cut Pro. I also have my own Youtube channel. . . BUT, I don't have MASTERS.

My Mturk Stats:
HITs Submitted 48290
... Approved 48269
... Rejected 1
... Pending 20

Let this be a lesson to Requesters out there.

 

[KYKITTY]

A Research Study on Web Browsing Behavior
Anyone got a time on this?

 

[electrolyte]

A Research Study on Web Browsing Behavior
Anyone got a time on this?

I'm doing it right now. 22 minutes in. The progress bar doesn't have a number on it but I'm at maybe 75%. It has writing.

Edit: 25 minutes going pretty slow.

 

[A6_Foul_Out]

A Research Study on Web Browsing Behavior
Anyone got a time on this?

~12-15 for me

already approved

 

[v2thej]

oh...now I'm really upset. I got a note back saying I made too many errors and had missing end, start and justifications...in general. This can't be right. I spent a loooong time, going over each of these like 10 to 15 minutes on most, and I am almost positive that I didn't have missing fields. I think there's been a mistake. Maybe I don't want to work with them now. This makes me so mad. I worked very hard on these, went over and over the times and I have a 99.9% approval rating so it's not like I'm a slouch. I think they have my ID mixed up with someone else's. I really think this is wrong... Ok...fine. Rant over. Hard not to let this mess up the day.

yeah hun i did the same crap, i hate timestamping videos, eff em just another qual that wasted my time, at least you got paid more than me, this stupid requester asked me to timestamp ccv video and jerked me around might have been one of my rejects but i aint got time for stupid requesters.

edit: not the car one, im sure all of us know the cctv one.

 

[alk69]

As a matter of fact, that's kinda the whole point of hockey, I think.

Geez, and here I thought the whole point of hockey was to see who could stand up longest while involved in a public brawl on a sheet of ice.....and keep their front teeth.

 

[Michele]

Sorry to hear that.

:yellowheart: thank you for that. I'll get over it. Just kind of stings, especially when you feel like it's a mistake.

 

[Starslip]

Whoo, caught that 5 dollar web browsing HIT from earlier today after being on panda for hours. Now I feel like I accomplished something today

 

[aveline]

Geez, and here I thought the whole point of hockey was to see who could stand up longest while involved in a public brawl on a sheet of ice.....and keep their front teeth.

They go hand in hand.

 

[Michele]

yeah hun i did the same crap, i hate timestamping videos, eff em just another qual that wasted my time, at least you got paid more than me, this stupid requester asked me to timestamp ccv video and jerked me around might have been one of my rejects but i aint got time for stupid requesters.

edit: not the car one, im sure all of us know the cctv one.

thank you

 

[Michele]

yeah hun i did the same crap, i hate timestamping videos, eff em just another qual that wasted my time, at least you got paid more than me, this stupid requester asked me to timestamp ccv video and jerked me around might have been one of my rejects but i aint got time for stupid requesters.

edit: not the car one, im sure all of us know the cctv one.

...and sorry they wasted your time.

 

[Jharkan]

PROLIFIC STUDY - click here to join prolific! Title: Perceptions of products - CURRENT members click here to go directly to survey Hosted by : Maddie Judge Reward : £ 0.50 Avg. Reward Per Hour : £5/hr Available Places : 1191/1200 Maximum Allowed Time : 20mins Avg. Completion Time : 6mins

 

[Tandem In Time]

Title: For people interested in editing video | PANDA Requester: Johnson Fung [A3AOPX0AA0DXD0] (TO) TO Ratings: 3.00 Communicativity 3.43 Generosity 4.00 Fairness 4.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 7 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Survey about video editing (~3 minutes) Time: 4 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Masters has been granted

I have an A.S. degree in Graphic Design. I have taken college classes on Adobe Premiere and Final Cut Pro. I also have my own Youtube channel. . . BUT, I don't have MASTERS.

My Mturk Stats:
HITs Submitted 48290
... Approved 48269
... Rejected 1
... Pending 20

Let this be a lesson to Requesters out there.

LOL! Actually your extensive background would have disqualified you for this particular survey. They're looking for feedback from beginner/intermediate users of video editing software.

 

[Jharkan]

Whoo, caught that 5 dollar web browsing HIT from earlier today after being on panda for hours. Now I feel like I accomplished something today

I caught two of them, and you probably caught my cast off.
I won't make any jokes about how you're getting my sloppy seconds though