06/04 - Marquee Moon on Monday!

[Persephone78]

I'm high but I'm not high enough for this:

Now imagine that your lawn mower has come to life as a slave who you own and whose job is to take care of your garden.
Please take 20 seconds to think about the sort of slave your lawn mower would be in terms of his/her personality, physical appearance, opinions, approaches, conversational style, and so forth.

I think he would be Orc like, not speak much English, and eat rocks. Opinions? He doesn't like Elves and gets really angry about bards. (But really, who doesn't?)

 

[ecko]

yeah I think I'm done with SC. I've been going into detail on all of my answers, more so than they did in their own examples.

they only want a few sentences so i think what they mean is describe your reasoning a bit better. like give a detailed explanation of why you believe what you are writing.

 

[themildone]

they only want a few sentences so i think what they mean is describe your reasoning a bit better. like give a detailed explanation of why you believe what you are writing.

I have been, though. I cite multiple examples from the data and explain why that's influencing my answer. I guess I just don't get what they want.

 

[rsclone]

Title: Generate words for a slur dictionary ~8 minutes(~ 5 minutes) | Accept Requester: Rachel Connor [A18V0G9G9QGJOA] Contact TO: [Pay=4.35] [Fast=4.86] [Comm=4.50] [Fair=4.89] [Reviews=44] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.55 Duration: 3600 Available: 6 Description: List and define slurs Qualifications: Exc: [91417-90828] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 500; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1; Location In US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.6​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]
k[/td][/tr]

 

[ecko]

I have been, though. I cite multiple examples from the data and explain why that's influencing my answer. I guess I just don't get what they want.

then i don't get it either, it sounds like you are doing exactly what they want.

 

[ccmet121]

I usually only put 2 sentences for my answers. I probably take about 40 mins though on each one because it takes me awhile to actually find 5 that are easy.

 

[Sarcasmologist]

panda for c-sats?

 

[Persephone78]

Title: Opinions and Issues(~ 2 minutes) | Accept Requester: Eccles School of Business Studies [A1E8FS7O72ISB9] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: [Pay=3.96] [Fast=4.68] [Comm=4.56] [Fair=4.62] [Reviews=33] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=9.00] [Pen=0.04 days] [Res=null] [Rec=100%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 0.20 Duration: 1800 Available: 1 Description: 2-minute survey on attitudes Qualifications: Exc: [91521-90932] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs LessThanOrEqualTo 500; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 70; Location In US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.6​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[Persephone78]

panda for c-sats?

Req I A15ZSKX8TUCGEU

 

[AngelFace]

Title: Speeded categorization of items(~ 12 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Frank H. Durgin [AB6S4UB9IEQTB] (Req TV): N/A (TO): [Pay: N/A] [Fair: N/A] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: N/A] Description: Use keyboard to classify items into categories Time: 1 hour(s) 30 minutes(s) HITs Available: 3 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; SurveyGroup [267] DoesNotExist ; Exc: [-1819357586-90928] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location In US;

 

[It's Gamera!]

I got my angry email too. Sounds like they're getting a bit touchier with what they want, which is funny because I spent more time than I really cared to in last week's thingy.

 

[WillowWolf]

I haven't gotten an email but you guys are making me really curious.

I haven't received one either. .

 

[Miriette]

Got a surveycomet email. What I don't get is one of the examples used for a good response is one of the ones I actually did, and I went into more detail than they did. So does that mean that part doesn't apply to me, and only the 40 minute minimum does?

I'm in the same boat as you. If the emails really are specific to each of us, then I'm not entirely sure where I'm going wrong. I write at least 3 sentences each, I give specific details from articles & other posters to explain my rationale, I look over other responses to make sure I at least have as much detail as most of them do... I guess I can give even more specific details, but it's a bit frustrating knowing I can do that and still possibly be kicked out of the study.
:<

At least I know to stall for 40 minutes now lol.

 

[C to the J]

I usually only put 2 sentences for my answers. I probably take about 40 mins though on each one because it takes me awhile to actually find 5 that are easy.

We're only supposed to be doing 2.

 

[SleepComa]

We're only supposed to be doing 2.

I think some poor souls got 5, lol.

 

[C to the J]

I think some poor souls got 5, lol.

I probably wouldn't even do that shit tbh.

 

[Birdie]

Helloooooo! Happy Monday folks! Don't mind me sneaking in the back door like I've been here the whole time!

 

[DareAngel3]

We're only supposed to be doing 2.

I think some poor souls got 5, lol.

Mine is 3

 

[MarkC]

This explains so much.

 

[WillowWolf]

We're only supposed to be doing 2.

2? Mine has always been 4. You mean you only have to do 2 every week?!