Title: Pinterest - Is this image pornographic or sexually suggestive? | Accept Requester: Pinterest [AURHK491L2LH6] Contact TO: [Pay=3.00] [Fast=3.93] [Comm=2.39] [Fair=4.42] [Reviews=103] [ToS=15] TO2: [Hrly=9.69] [Pen=1.75 days] [Res=0%] [Rec=45%] [Rej=1] [ToS=1] [Brk=3] Reward: 0.40 Duration: 1200 Available: 1 Description: You will log in to Pinterest to complete simple tasks. Qualifications: Scammers DoesNotExist ; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1 [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.9 |
THEY KILLED GLEN?!?!?!nah...I used to watch TWD before they killed Glenn so I qualified luckily...
Who do I have to fightI don't know if this is considered survey content, it's the instructions on Rowan's HITs and it makes me so mad that people do shit like this to requesters. It makes life so much harder for the rest of us.
- Unfortunately, I've been noticing malicious spam on my HITs over the last two days. One worker submitted 1000 HITs responding "I can't think of 1 question" three times on each one (thus getting the bonus for filling out 3 questions). This was the first time I had to block a worker and reject work, and I hope I never have to do it again. However, because I'm wary about this kind of spam in the future, I'm bumping up the autoapprove time to 72 hours (but my autoapprover will try to approve you even sooner, hopefully within 48 hours). I want to emphasize that this will not affect legitimate workers like yourself - if you don't purposefully use a bot to spam me, I won't reject or block you. I'm just mentioning this to give some context for why I can't autoapprove as quickly any more
Title: Opinion survey about housing situations | Accept Requester: BTSol [A37KVIQTPGPD3R] Contact TV: [Hrly=$13.10] [Pay=3.89] [Fast=null] [Comm=null] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=4.78] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=10] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=8.63] [Pen=2.00 days] [Res=null] [Rec=100%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 1.15 Duration: 1800 Available: 1 Description: Short (~5 minute) survey asks your opinion/reaction to home-related situations and a few demographics Qualifications: Excluded Workers NotEqualTo 16; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.11 |
I think the problem is the appeal that the name gives off.Casual sexism.
I feel like this should be something that amazon should do more about, otherwise, why do they even collect a rake from the requesters?
casual sex > casual sexistismI think the problem is the appeal that the name gives off.
Casual sexism has always seemed like such a relaxing hobby.
It's like....
We should repeal the 19th amendment
I think the problem is the appeal that the name gives off.
Casual sexism has always seemed like such a relaxing hobby.
It's like....
We should repeal the 19th amendment
Well, that was disappointing.[tr][td][/td][/tr]
Title: Pinterest - Is this image pornographic or sexually suggestive? | Accept
Requester: Pinterest [AURHK491L2LH6] Contact
TO: [Pay=3.00] [Fast=3.93] [Comm=2.39] [Fair=4.42] [Reviews=103] [ToS=15]
TO2: [Hrly=9.69] [Pen=1.75 days] [Res=0%] [Rec=45%] [Rej=1] [ToS=1] [Brk=3]
Reward: 0.40
Duration: 1200
Available: 1
Description: You will log in to Pinterest to complete simple tasks.
Qualifications: Scammers DoesNotExist ; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1
[tr][td]
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.9
xxx[/td][/tr]
Title: New Dot Game | Accept Requester: Cocosci Lab at UC Berkeley [AHG3DFQ65ESGY] Contact TO: [Pay=4.05] [Fast=4.76] [Comm=4.31] [Fair=4.84] [Reviews=418] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=3.66] [Pen=3.55 days] [Res=57%] [Rec=56%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=3] Reward: 0.75 Duration: 3600 Available: 20 Description: Determine if the red dot moved relative to the image Qualifications: Masters Exists [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.9 |
It'd be nice, for sure. Only problem is Amazon is some draconian place that segregates its workers into groups that compete against one another, so usually things seem to be pushed to the back burner unless it's escalated somehow. Not to mention they place the burden of responsibility, for the most part, on the requesters themselves... I guess they think the block and reject features are good enough tools for sorting through the madness.I feel like this should be something that amazon should do more about, otherwise, why do they even collect a rake from the requesters?
TWSSWell, that was disappointing.
that's what she saidWell, that was disappointing.
u look pretty easyThat a9 batch looks pretty easy.
I make it look effortless.u look pretty easy