- Joined
- May 9, 2017
- Messages
- 20,565
- Reaction score
- 54,719
- Points
- 1,738
- Location
- Houston, TX
- Gender
- Male
I'm sure all double mouth-feels aren't good.
I'm sure all double mouth-feels aren't good.
who mass rejected today? First time logging i n .I hear you but, that's just a random percentage because some requesters respond 100% of the time. I, personally, get responses about 70% of the time. Can't really form a rule based on past experience because each requester has their own response rate, if that is such a thing. I'm just saying that, regardless of any answer anyone here can give you, it's always worth a shot to message the requester because they're the only ones who can give a definitive answer. I'm just promoting safe turk practices since, with today's mass rejection, a lot of newer people broke one of the cardinal rules(Don't risk more than you're willing to lose with an "unknown" requester), and will have a hell of a time trudging back up to 99%. Of course it's always good to ask here but, I always say, "Take everything that you hear here with a large grain of salt." There are caveats and exceptions to most every rule and, bottom line, I'm usually only going to accept an answer as fact, if I get it straight from the horses mouth, so to speak. But, since you are the one who's going to eat the rejection if you get bad info from a well meaning person, it's really your choice as to which information you are going to include in your decision making process.
I guess, bottom line, it only takes a second to cc a requester with the same question posted here. Then you'll have both answers.
I just want everyone to be able to turk for as long as they'd like and hate to see new people tank their accounts over something that could be prevented.
(not you "new" I mean non avatar people.)
Some stoner. Don't know the name. I didn't do them because they were way subjective, obviously.who mass rejected today? First time logging i n .
cj is a requester now?Some stoner. Don't know the name. I didn't do them because they were way subjective, obviously.
C2theJ is a connoisseur. I'm a stoner.cj is a requester now?
I was too lazy to get my preferences, yo gif cause I'd have to minimize wow to find chrome >.>You're jaded-ing wrong.
ftfy
Some shit hits.who mass rejected today? First time logging i n .
Sure hope you have some possum stew to go with that cold milk!... Sure want my neighbors to bring by my gallon of cold milk and bags of ice (fridge not working). Then maybe I can eat some food.
Title: Quick survey | Accept Requester: b-research [A16C9E7DVXREJ0] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: [Pay=4.11] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=11] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=11.87] [Pen=1.00 days] [Res=null] [Rec=100%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 0.25 Duration: 3600 Available: 20 Description: - Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.12 |
Be safe @ChristopherASAGood night, @Itsmee
Title: Survey about Robots | Accept Requester: Dylan Moore [A3KM5GU8XY6KTC] Contact TO: [Pay=4.00] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=6] [ToS=0] Reward: 1.00 Duration: 1800 Available: 1 Description: Watch a series of short videos and respond to what you see. Qualifications: Participant in Robot Video Study DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.12 |
It's difficult being UNsafe around here, but I appreciate the sentiment. You, too, @Itsmee . OK, now I'm really logging off.Be safe @ChristopherASA
fair enough. didn't want to waste panda resources on a hit i'd have to toss backI hear you but, that's just a random percentage because some requesters respond 100% of the time. I, personally, get responses about 70% of the time. Can't really form a rule based on past experience because each requester has their own response rate, if that is such a thing. I'm just saying that, regardless of any answer anyone here can give you, it's always worth a shot to message the requester because they're the only ones who can give a definitive answer. I'm just promoting safe turk practices since, with today's mass rejection, a lot of newer people broke one of the cardinal rules(Don't risk more than you're willing to lose with an "unknown" requester), and will have a hell of a time trudging back up to 99%. Of course it's always good to ask here but, I always say, "Take everything that you hear here with a large grain of salt." There are caveats and exceptions to most every rule and, bottom line, I'm usually only going to accept an answer as fact, if I get it straight from the horses mouth, so to speak. But, since you are the one who's going to eat the rejection if you get bad info from a well meaning person, it's really your choice as to which information you are going to include in your decision making process.
I guess, bottom line, it only takes a second to cc a requester with the same question posted here. Then you'll have both answers.
I just want everyone to be able to turk for as long as they'd like and hate to see new people tank their accounts over something that could be prevented.
(not you "new" I mean non avatar people.)
Title: Quick survey | Accept Requester: b-research [A16C9E7DVXREJ0] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: [Pay=4.11] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=11] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=11.87] [Pen=1.00 days] [Res=null] [Rec=100%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 0.35 Duration: 3600 Available: 3 Description: - Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.12 |