- Joined
- Aug 6, 2016
- Messages
- 4,769
- Reaction score
- 8,180
- Points
- 838
- Age
- 56
- Gender
- Female
Doesn't seem to be a whole lot worth working on. I guess I missed out on Alexandria's today. Hub made pork chops so I'm going to eat dinner.
I was just looking at that thinking the same thing. I know a lot of these are underpaid, but that went above and beyond in that category.IRBs should establish a base rate that's acceptable to pay your research subjects and trying to pay someone 2 dollars for a 90 minute survey should be considered an ethics violation
Look at all of the reject potential:IRBs should establish a base rate that's acceptable to pay your research subjects and trying to pay someone 2 dollars for a 90 minute survey should be considered an ethics violation
IRBs should establish a base rate that's acceptable to pay your research subjects and trying to pay someone 2 dollars for a 90 minute survey should be considered an ethics violation
Not that any of this is unusual, but they seem awfully bossy for not wanting to pay anything for a 90 minute survey.Look at all of the reject potential:
WARNING - You will not receive payment for the hit if:
1) You do not complete the survey.
2) Upon completion, you fail to give your Worker ID on the last question of the survey.
3) Upon completion, you fail to give your Worker ID in the above textbox.
4) Upon completion, you fail to give an ID on the last question of the survey that matches the ID placed in the above comment box.
5) You have already taken this survey.
6) You do not meet study participant requirements posted in the Informed Consent.
The $2/90 minute HIT has a threat to reject if you try to complete it twice.IRBs should establish a base rate that's acceptable to pay your research subjects and trying to pay someone 2 dollars for a 90 minute survey should be considered an ethics violation
Some of them do.IRBs should establish a base rate that's acceptable to pay your research subjects and trying to pay someone 2 dollars for a 90 minute survey should be considered an ethics violation
Ooh, how long ago did you do it? I finished about 2 hours agoGreetings from Amazon Mechanical Turk,
You've received a bonus from Michelle Cho for work related to 37VUR2VJ6BAOXY1U27V7YQ3TOSU1CT.
The value of your bonus is: $14.00 USD
The Requester included this note:
Thanks for completing the transcription HIT.
Thanks for being a Worker on Mechanical Turk!
The day of bonuses continues.
Translated:Look at all of the reject potential:
WARNING - You will not receive payment for the hit if:
1) You do not complete the survey.
2) Upon completion, you fail to give your Worker ID on the last question of the survey.
3) Upon completion, you fail to give your Worker ID in the above textbox.
4) Upon completion, you fail to give an ID on the last question of the survey that matches the ID placed in the above comment box.
5) You have already taken this survey.
6) You do not meet study participant requirements posted in the Informed Consent.
I did mine 10/12.Ooh, how long ago did you do it? I finished about 2 hours ago
...I was hoping you'd say like "noon"I did mine 10/12.
Lol. I was reading it as "10 or 12". I'm so stupid sometimes....I was hoping you'd say like "noon"
Valid pointLol. I was reading it as "10 or 12". I'm so stupid sometimes.
I don't know if that's necessary. I'm pretty sure I was just half-awake.Valid point
To clarify: 10/12/2018
Or like a lot when they are paying $2 for 1.5 hrs. But, yeah, pretty standard, just something about the big WARNING makes it stand out more.Translated:
If you have taken this study before or can't enter your AMT ID properly, your submission will be rejected. Pretty standard. Just looks like a lot when listed like that.
What's a toe bean?I just had to save a cat cause it got its toe bean stuck in a part of the cage and I started crying because he was so sad and crying and that is just ridiculous.