01/10 - Three-Cheese Thursday

[IndividualRace]

i had zero luck with high paying stuff today, you got them all, haha

They're nice, yet at the same time you know when the researcher is looking for a certain answer. Today, they're all making me feel like a crappy person because of the answers I choose. But, $$$

 

[Cara]

Title: 'Charitable giving questions' 4-minute survey(~ 4 minutes) | Accept Requester: Mturk Admin [A3OHKFW1QIV8AP] Contact TV: [Hrly=$18.89] [Pay=4.75] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=null] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=2.91] [Fast=4.00] [Comm=1.80] [Fair=3.40] [Reviews=17] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=5.81] [Pen=1.33 days] [Res=null] [Rec=80%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 0.50 Duration: 30:00 Available: 1 Description: Survey for people who donate to charity about their giving Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; SurveyGroup [1255] DoesNotExist ; Exc: [2007080437-122971] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location In US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.4.6​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[ChristopherASA]

I AM SO JEALOUS!!! He is an underappreciated gem!! His Count + Orchestra records are my favorite records to throw on the turntable if we've got people over, such a talented man.

Well then.

 

[TSolo315]

I don't use TO 2. Only TO 1, and if you use Mturk Suite and hover over the title it has great scores on TO, and the HIT was 5 minutes for 3 dollars that approved instantly so I'm just going to have to ignore the reviews on TO 2. Besides, TO 2 only have 6 reviews and TO 1 have 118 reviews.

Here are some reviews from their TO1:

3.00

nearly 40m
no code

Really?? 50 cents for 30 minutes? LOL

Description: Participate in innovative research!! In this study, you will be asked to complete a social judgment computer task and a survey.

Took a look thinking maybe there was a bonus since it paid so low... Nope.

Don't waste your time.

~25 mins for $1 pretty poor pay considering.


My major issue is that this requester asks for FULL real name in this hit. 1 group will not be asked to identify themselves and 1 group will. He did not get my last name as requested. I've also sent him a link to the Requester FAQ page and explained why I was not comfortable giving him this information. I would have just closed it out but, I was already about 7 minutes in.

Cherrypicking some bad ones, but they have pretty mixed reviews in general, hardly perfect.

I've been doing this for a long time, and tend to be able to make pretty strong intuitive estimates at how well surveys will pay. I was wrong about this survey however, which is why I was grateful to starslip for sharing a time.

 

[FrenchToast]

Just submitted a survey that I meant to return with another surveys code by accident. Rejection incoming.

 

[Despairagus]

Just submitted a survey that I meant to return with another surveys code by accident. Rejection incoming.

Oof

 

[cb456]

Just submitted a survey that I meant to return with another surveys code by accident. Rejection incoming.

you might get lucky.

 

[themildone]

I don't use TO 2. Only TO 1, and if you use Mturk Suite and hover over the title it has great scores on TO, and the HIT was 5 minutes for 3 dollars that approved instantly so I'm just going to have to ignore the reviews on TO 2. Besides, TO 2 only have 6 reviews and TO 1 have 118 reviews.

can I ask why you don't consider the TO2?

 

[ChristopherASA]

@Despairagus And Basie was so frigging relaxed when he was "at work."

 

[Despairagus]

Well then.

FANTASTIC

 

[Despairagus]

@Despairagus And Basie was so frigging relaxed when he was "at work."

Gosh, I believe it. Man like that has to love what he does to be that good!

 

[TotalBabe]

"The requester managing this HIT has chosen to limit the number of responses from any one geographic location. This HIT has already met its quota for responses from your geographic area. Please return the HIT."

Spoiler

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

 

[Amon]

Just submitted a survey that I meant to return with another surveys code by accident. Rejection incoming.

I take comfort in the fact that I am not the only one to ever do that, thanks.

 

[FrenchToast]

you might get lucky.

I'm too nice/honest. I sent them a message right away apologizing and stating specifically I AM NOT A SCAMMER. LOL

 

[nmelssx]

can I ask why you don't consider the TO2?

Have always used TO 1. Don't really like the style of TO 2, and TO 1 usually have a lot more reviews.

 

[Michele]

Title: Identify spam in a set of academic papers | Accept Requester: henry [A9QTK9RAVXB5M] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: [Pay=3.05] [Fast=4.12] [Comm=2.33] [Fair=4.28] [Reviews=21] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.33 Duration: 15:00 Available: 746 Description: Categorize a set of academic papers: Spam versus Low-quality versus High-quality Qualifications: mTurkers from round 1 of Spam DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 98; Location EqualTo US; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1 [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.4.6​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[FrenchToast]

I take comfort in the fact that I am not the only one to ever do that, thanks.

I swear I hit return, must have missed the enter for confirmation though before I switched back to the survey tab. I think its a first for me.

 

[cb456]

I'm too nice/honest. I sent them a message right away apologizing and stating specifically I AM NOT A SCAMMER. LOL

you probably already did, but offer to take the survey if they give you a link...

 

[Bliss]

Title: Perceptions of Animals(~ 20 minutes) | AcceptA Requester: Scabl [AOSJTYU5BJRCK] Contact TV: No Reviews TO: [Pay: 3.64] [Fast: 4.60] [Comm: 4.63] [Fair: 4.73] [Reviews: 118] [ToS: 2] TO2: No Reviews Reward: $3.00 Duration: 30 minutes Available: 10 Description: survey Requirements: Exc: [123627-123038] DoesNotExist; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location In US

 

[DareAngel3]

Have always used TO 1. Don't really like the style of TO 2, and TO 1 usually have a lot more reviews.

I don't mean to pull an @A6_Foul_Out , but finally using TurkerView was a game changer for me. It seems to be much more accurate and helpful than either TO, and integrates just as easily with MTS.