- Joined
- Jan 12, 2016
- Messages
- 26,701
- Reaction score
- 51,319
- Points
- 1,463
- Gender
- Female
the researchers hypothesis is that they can train 'ordinary' people to do these evaluations of md's in training. I don't know why they expect this is potentially cost-effective, but that's the assumption (looked it up onceIt says "surgeons" so I'd assume they're human. I can't imagine many willing living participants who want their surgery done by a robot training on them. Unless you mean us voting on who does a good job can somehow help AI technology? I think the AI could know that way better than us... if it's going to do surgery it would be sophisticated enough to analyze data and have no need for us. I think it's more of a rating system for new surgeons.
On the side note, all of my John Henderson hits were accepted!