08/11 - Taekwondo Thursday!

[Barbwire]

I'm rejecting all of your hits

 

[TurkingMaster]

That's it you're hard blocked!

 

[VGB]

I think a lot of people are getting categories confused......conformance and perceived quality specifically.
I suppose if you do them all that way then he really kinda has to mass reject....it's shitty though.

yeah, I suppose so, but its pretty plainly spelled out with tons of examples (and from the wording it seems like even more clarification was added) and a wiki link to boot

its a waste of requester money to pay for garbage results, especially after putting people through a qualification round, which really isn't their fault

 

[Barbwire]

That's it you're hard blocked!

overruled

 

[Digital Nomad]

Title: Abstracts in Academia(~ 45 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Morton A Gernsbacher [A3GUBSF9CLAGFL] (TO) TO Ratings: 4.62 Communicativity 4.70 Generosity 4.60 Fairness 4.52 Promptness Number of Reviews: 35 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Read short scientific abstracts and answer questions - PLEASE ONLY ACCEPT HIT IF YOU ARE A NATIVE ENGLISH SPEAKER AND HAVE COMPLETED SOME COLLEGE/UNIVERSITY COURSES Time: 1 hour 30 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $5.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Masters has been granted; 98f8e912 has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 93; Exc: [536201-17974] has not been granted

 

[TurkingMaster]

overruled

 

[Digital Nomad]

2min

Title: report how emotional or moving you find images and text | PANDA Requester: joel pearson [A3I34E75VQ8VTO] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinion about text and images Time: 15 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Masters has been granted

 

[C to the J]

yeah, I suppose so, but its pretty plainly spelled out with tons of examples (and from the wording it seems like even more clarification was added) and a wiki link to boot

its a waste of requester money to pay for garbage results, especially after putting people through a qualification round, which really isn't their fault

Wholeheartedly agree but compared to the other categories those ones are a bit confusing.
Maybe put them in red.....with underlines.....and large text....with a sign that says "read this, jackass"

 

[Billnye817]

I think a lot of people are getting categories confused......conformance and perceived quality specifically.
I suppose if you do them all that way then he really kinda has to mass reject....it's shitty though.

If someone legitimately gets those two categories confused I feel they do deserve a Mass Reject. It is abundantly obvious what the two mean and the examples really clear up confusion between the two.

That said if someone is inaccurate here and there putting something into one of those or the other, I don't see it as a big deal tbh..

 

[MerryLou]

 

[VGB]

Wholeheartedly agree but compared to the other categories those ones are a bit confusing.
Maybe put them in red.....with underlines.....and large text....with a sign that says "read this, jackass"

you basically have to force-feed some people instructions, unfortunately

sometimes that means a mass reject

I definitely double checked examples on most of what I did, which I why I only did a few

if you don't get it, don't do 'em, you know?

 

[kryss]

@TissueHime

dibs

 

[Jharkan]

anybody do the .90c mad lib hit from research project that dropped an hour ago

I did, and I feel great!

 

[sryan66611]

@TissueHime

dibs

denied...

 

[kryss]

denied...

 

[TurkingMaster]

@TissueHime

dibs

 

[sryan66611]

 

[kryss]

 

[JenniLeigh]

Buffyyyyyyy
Is this from your show?

@Vanyanka

 

[saturn]

giphy why can't i quit you