08/11 - Taekwondo Thursday!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jharkan

Jharkan

Internets EXPERT
Contributor
Joined
Jul 9, 2016
Messages
11,873
Reaction score
20,418
Points
1,288
Location
Earth
Gender
Male
Jharkan said:
As an expert at excellent television shows, I'll fill you in on that.

this is gossip girl. blair waldorf.
Click to expand...
and as you can see by my correct answer, I'm also an expert at terrible television shows
 
T. Leela

T. Leela

Oh Lord...
Contributor
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
11,050
Reaction score
14,046
Points
1,388
Location
Colorado
Gender
Female
I
VGB said:
yeah, I suppose so, but its pretty plainly spelled out with tons of examples (and from the wording it seems like even more clarification was added) and a wiki link to boot

its a waste of requester money to pay for garbage results, especially after putting people through a qualification round, which really isn't their fault
Click to expand...
I was worried because when I asked about some, not that majority, that seemed, and this was after reading the examples and the wiki over and over, a tad subjective, they sort of fit under perceived quality and sort of under price and/or whatever, because they were very different from examples, i basically was worried about how black and white they were going to judge them all. And he/she told me not to do them if I wasn't sure because they would go through them and if ten or more similar mistakes were made there would be mass rejections. I did understand the categories and what they wanted overall and apparently , I am assuming, they had some...what do you call it, quality checks maybe? and maybe that's what she went by, other than some of the really vague ones.
And ok im falling asleep, im done babbling ....sorry doesn't matter, looks like it came out ok :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: VGB
VGB

VGB

dr. peepee poopoo
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
5,753
Reaction score
15,213
Points
1,038
Age
38
Location
Milwaukee via Boston
Gender
Male
T. Leela said:
I was worried because when I asked about some, not that majority, that seemed, and this was after reading the examples and the wiki over and over, a tad subjective, they sort of fit under perceived quality and sort of under price and/or whatever, because they were very different from examples, i basically was worried about how black and white they were going to judge them all. And he/she told me not to do them if I wasn't sure because they would go through them and if ten or more similar mistakes were made there would be mass rejections. I did understand the categories and what they wanted overall and apparently , I am assuming, they had some...what do you call it, quality checks maybe? and maybe that's what she went by, other than some of the really vague ones.
And ok im falling asleep, im done babbling ....sorry doesn't matter, looks like it came out ok :)
Click to expand...
not babbling, makes sense to me; whole point of this thing is to get mass amounts of work done without having to check every single detail, so if you fail obvious checks a bunch of times, you're SOL and your work gets tossed

either way, the fact they're so open about how they go about things is nice to see, even going so far as to warn people not to do them if they aren't confident after clarification

seems you and everyone else here made out fine, though, so that's good
 
  • Like
Reactions: T. Leela
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom