09/21 - Wake Me Up on Wednesday!

[tricker]

Ethics. They get in the way of making money.

"Only do this survey if you don't have strong opinions about the upcoming presidential election."

Returned.

 

[ecko]

Has anyone read x lab's TO recently. It got tanked.

 

[Onyxbird]

X Lab, has been doing some rejecting, so TO says and blocks.

 

[catnapped]

Title: Evaluate a cooking recipe (Easy and fun!) | PANDA Requester: X Lab [A3OK2HGHN7LVIN] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 1.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.20 Generosity ★★★★★ 2.71 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.20 Promptness Number of Reviews: 9 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Rate how well a recipe is written and how well it fits a given list of ingredients and title Time: 10 minutes HITs Available: 175 Reward: $0.17 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95;Location is US

On these if it shows your having every food known to man but the recipe only uses a little bit of it, is it considered one of the lower choices for the 2nd question or the higher one because you have everything the recipe calls for?

 

[tricker]

So many surveys today for the fully employed.

And I still can't catch half of them.

(and I would add "fully employed poor people otherwise we wouldn't also be turking") well, most of us.

 

[rjd66]

What type of free virus scanners do you guys use? My laptop has slowed waaaay down, may be because I'm more used to wired connections, but I don't remember ever seeing it this slow.

Malwarebytes | Free Anti-Malware & Internet Security Software

Free version scans and works very well

 

[Matilda Jones]

Title: Read texts and answer questions about them | PANDA Requester: istart [A2VQKWWD3SIZBD] (TO) TO Ratings: TO Unavailable Submit a new TO review Description: Read a series of texts about a variety of topics and answer questions about them Time: 2 hours HITs Available: 8 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: None

 

[fortesque_turk]

For anyone that ever gets stuck on attention checks where it says "do not select an option," or for any need to unselect a radio button, here's a way to unselect a radio button:

http://micahjon.com/how-to-deselect-radio-buttons-on-web-forms/

Bonus: If you scroll all the way down, it just explains how to uncheck all radio buttons.

 

[C to the J]

Title: Evaluate a cooking recipe (Easy and fun!) | PANDA Requester: X Lab [A3OK2HGHN7LVIN] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 1.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.20 Generosity ★★★★★ 2.71 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.20 Promptness Number of Reviews: 9 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Rate how well a recipe is written and how well it fits a given list of ingredients and title Time: 10 minutes HITs Available: 140 Reward: $0.17 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95;Location is US

NEVERMIND LOOK TO BE REJECTING ALOT!!!

Everyone here was fine last night.
I did well over 100 with no problems.

Hope this batch goes well.

 

[ctraltDel]

On these if it shows your having every food known to man but the recipe only uses a little bit of it, is it considered one of the lower choices for the 2nd question or the higher one because you have everything the recipe calls for?

I think it means higher, as in the list is your pantry and whether you have enough stuff to make it. I found that confusing too, but with that way of thinking I haven't gotten any rejections.

 

[Matilda Jones]

Everyone here was fine last night.
I did well over 100 with no problems.

Hope this batch goes well.

From TO sounds like most of the rejections were people just putting the same top answer every time. If you're being thoughtful, should probably be ok.

 

[Matilda Jones]

Title: Emotionally and Physically Abusive Relationships (See Description for Qualification Details, Sensitive Questions) | PANDA Requester: Angela Listy [A1M2H0HAEXONBY] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 4.26 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.21 Generosity ★★★★★ 4.40 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.97 Promptness Number of Reviews: 66 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: We invite you to take this survey which explores people's experiences in unhealthy relationships. The questions and the topic are sensitive, so please only accept this HIT if you are comfortable with sharing your experience in an unhealthy relationship. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.20 Qualifications: Location is US

Trigger warning.

 

[rjd66]

Title: Emotionally and Physically Abusive Relationships (See Description for Qualification Details, Sensitive Questions) | PANDA Requester: Angela Listy [A1M2H0HAEXONBY] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 4.26 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.21 Generosity ★★★★★ 4.40 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.97 Promptness Number of Reviews: 66 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: We invite you to take this survey which explores people's experiences in unhealthy relationships. The questions and the topic are sensitive, so please only accept this HIT if you are comfortable with sharing your experience in an unhealthy relationship. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.20 Qualifications: Location is US

5:30 to complete

 

[Onyxbird]

From TO sounds like most of the rejections were people just putting the same top answer every time. If you're being thoughtful, should probably be ok.

Those are my thoughts exactly. I didn't rush through the ones I did, and they were approved.

 

[electrolyte]

Title: Stigmatized STIs - Survey Review WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised. | PANDA Requester: Angela Listy [A1M2H0HAEXONBY] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.21] [Fair: 4.40] [Comm: 4.26] [Fast: 4.97] Description: Please take and review this survey about your thoughts on different sexually transmitted infections. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Masters has been granted; Location is US; Adult Content Qualification is 1;

 

[catnapped]

Angela getting up into everyone's business today

 

[Matilda Jones]

Angela getting up into everyone's business today

She thinks only Masters have STDs though.

 

[P L A Y E R 9 1]

NEVERMIND LOOK TO BE REJECTING ALOT!!!

went ham without looking :spaz:

 

[catnapped]

went ham without looking :spaz:

You're probably good.

"Probably...."

 

[Kerek]

went ham without looking :spaz:

Race to 3000.