09/22 - The Sound of Thursday!

[bxpretzel]

Title: Investigating Semantic Representations(~ 18 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Dermot Lynott [A325L0H6Q5L71I] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 3.20] [Fair: 3.00] [Comm: 1.00] [Fast: 3.00] Description: A multiple choice survey about common words Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.25 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Exc: [21644730-21920] has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 97; Adult Content Qualification is 1; Location is one of: US;

this was fairly quick yesterday although it annoys me that there's no completion bar on the survey

 

[C to the J]

Weird these choose the flavor people are posting under so many different accounts.
By my count, that was the 5th one since last night

 

[catnapped]

Tiny screaming baby is in a good mood and says hi @Liz

Spoiler: hi

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

:hearteyecat:

 

[Metallica]

Weird these choose the flavor people are posting under so many different accounts.
By my count, that was the 5th one since last night

They're the new 'quick and easy' hits. At least until they get banned from being posted

 

[C to the J]

They're the new 'quick and easy' hits. At least until they get banned from being posted

Nah you're thinking of the "rate the quality of this summary" people.

 

[bxpretzel]

Title: Ben Franklin(~ 30 minutes) | PANDA Requester: David A Dunning [A2N0EK65M4HGDY] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 3.83] [Fair: 4.95] [Comm: 4.00] [Fast: 4.74] Description: You will spend 30 minutes reading a short description and answering some general knowledge questions. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Exc: [707363-21860] has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is one of: US;

just caught this on panda from yesterday

 

[Metallica]

Nah you're thinking of the "rate the quality of this summary" people.

Fuck those people, my block list has increased by like 200 since they started posting.

 

[bxpretzel]

Title: Ice Cream Survey | PANDA Requester: Mallory Wilczynski [AQ7WWYJDJSMSM] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: N/A] [Fair: N/A] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: N/A] Description: Give us your opinoins about ice cream flavors. Time: 10 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: None

edit: 1m

 

[C to the J]

Title: Ice Cream Survey | PANDA Requester: Mallory Wilczynski [AQ7WWYJDJSMSM] (Contact) (TO): No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinoins about ice cream flavors. Time: 10 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: None

6th?

 

[jan]

I just looked it up too, but I kinda wish I hadn't. That's awful.

 

[bxpretzel]

Title: Ice Cream Survey | PANDA Requester: Mallory Wilczynski [AQ7WWYJDJSMSM] (Contact) (TO): No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinoins about ice cream flavors. Time: 10 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: None

6th?

this was different from the yogurt survey. same interface though

 

[bxpretzel]

You've received a bonus from Jonathan Grenier for work related to 388CL5C1RJY041DKTJEZJF5AMJ5HLK.
The value of your bonus is: $0.25 USD

The Requester included this note:
I wanted to show my gratitude for all of you that DILIGENTLY completed my study. I'm getting very frustrated with other workers who complete HITs very quickly, and not only complain but leave negative feedback on sites like TurkOpticon when their work is rejected. For example, one worker who only spend 6 minutes on the 30 minute HIT and did very poorly on the very easy review questions wrote me to complain about his rejection and tell me that he left negative feedback. This is becoming a pervasive strategy on MTurk where low quality workers essentially drive requesters who actually check for quality work off of MTurk through negative emails and feedback. Then, they are free to breeze through HITs (with little chance of rejection as the requesters that verify are gone or no longer verifying) reducing opportunities for good workers like you. I'm not asking you to give me positive feedback (but you can if you like), but please use the feedback sites for good requesters, not just the bad, to reduce the effectiveness of the strategy. Also, if you liked my HIT, I have several other good ones coming out in the next few weeks.

tl;dr

 

[C to the J]

Title: Answer a survey about your potato chip preferences | PANDA Requester: Thomas Sticha [AT4QCDJNV9UGE] (Contact) (TO): No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: We want your opinions on potato chip flavors and eating habits Time: 20 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: None

looks like another one

 

[Metallica]

How many times are you supposed to ask the bot a question on the 75's? This looks wildly underpaid.

 

[Nytmair]

Title: Answer a survey about your potato chip preferences | PANDA Requester: Thomas Sticha [AT4QCDJNV9UGE] (Contact) (TO): No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: We want your opinions on potato chip flavors and eating habits Time: 20 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: None

looks like another one

What is HAPPENING

 

[catnapped]

You've received a bonus from Jonathan Grenier for work related to 388CL5C1RJY041DKTJEZJF5AMJ5HLK.
The value of your bonus is: $0.25 USD

The Requester included this note:
I wanted to show my gratitude for all of you that DILIGENTLY completed my study. I'm getting very frustrated with other workers who complete HITs very quickly, and not only complain but leave negative feedback on sites like TurkOpticon when their work is rejected. For example, one worker who only spend 6 minutes on the 30 minute HIT and did very poorly on the very easy review questions wrote me to complain about his rejection and tell me that he left negative feedback. This is becoming a pervasive strategy on MTurk where low quality workers essentially drive requesters who actually check for quality work off of MTurk through negative emails and feedback. Then, they are free to breeze through HITs (with little chance of rejection as the requesters that verify are gone or no longer verifying) reducing opportunities for good workers like you. I'm not asking you to give me positive feedback (but you can if you like), but please use the feedback sites for good requesters, not just the bad, to reduce the effectiveness of the strategy. Also, if you liked my HIT, I have several other good ones coming out in the next few weeks.

tl;dr

How much for said 30 minute survey?

 

[Liz]

Tiny screaming baby is in a good mood and says hi @Liz

Spoiler: hi

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

Oh my gosh I want her!!! Please come live with me and bring her too!

 

[Pippa]

Would you all kindly start throwing back those 1, 2, 3, 4 dollar hits? I have my pandas on.

Thank you

 

[bxpretzel]

Title: Answer a survey about your potato chip preferences | PANDA Requester: Thomas Sticha [AT4QCDJNV9UGE] (Contact) (TO): No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: We want your opinions on potato chip flavors and eating habits Time: 20 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: None

looks like another one

45 seconds and i LOVE potato chips omg. this was a good survey.

 

[Metallica]

lol

You've received a bonus from Jonathan Grenier for work related to 3VQTAXTYN3WTWEXS25W4ORYV4X3UBL.
The value of your bonus is: $0.25 USD

The Requester included this note:
I wanted to show my gratitude for all of you that DILIGENTLY completed my study. I'm getting very frustrated with other workers who complete HITs very quickly, and not only complain but leave negative feedback on sites like TurkOpticon when their work is rejected. For example, one worker who only spend 6 minutes on the 30 minute HIT and did very poorly on the very easy review questions wrote me to complain about his rejection and tell me that he left negative feedback. This is becoming a pervasive strategy on MTurk where low quality workers essentially drive requesters who actually check for quality work off of MTurk through negative emails and feedback. Then, they are free to breeze through HITs (with little chance of rejection as the requesters that verify are gone or no longer verifying) reducing opportunities for good workers like you. I'm not asking you to give me positive feedback (but you can if you like), but please use the feedback sites for good requesters, not just the bad, to reduce the effectiveness of the strategy. Also, if you liked my HIT, I have several other good ones coming out in the next few weeks.