10/31 - Mirific MTC Monsters Monday

[Definitely Not Riss]

No, you woke me up, I"m waking you up.

WAKE UP @ProbablyNotRiss

you woke yourself up.

 

[Tigerpants]

Word, even more confused as to why I am capping at about 100 evey day then. I start hamming around 7AM CST, then work from my que with the Project Endor script while more are coming in. I always seem to clear my que before it ever fills up. I am either missing something important or my internet sucks, or something.. but my internet is pretty decent so I am guessing I am missing an important part of the equation.

Yeah I never get more then 70-90 and I start when the batch starts.

I do a panda crazy with delayed go ham mode on, and never let my queue get full so I can keep catching them.

 

[MerryLou]

Hello, I'm an undecided voter and a big dum dum, what's your stance on rats? Particularly forum ones. Thank you.

You do too know.

 

[Mythical Samurai Turker]

did it work?

Edit: Yes!

 

[adude]

I have no clue how you are catching that many. I never filled my que and was hamming them the whole time and I still only got < 100.

Being geographically close to the server handing out the hits (better ping) and having low cycle times for PC play a role I imagine. 30+/- milliseconds might make the difference, it's the same concept as why wallstreet peeps go to such extreme measures with laying their own fiber and positioning their offices at certain places so they can gain a few ms extra internet speed.

 

[MostlyConfused]

I open two separate windows as well. I don't have masters though so my que is way less than 200 but either way my que never got full today. What do you mean you load up the remainder in the background?

Dumb question...Masters get a queue for 200?? Not 25?!?!

 

[adude]

I only got 19 Zoltars. How sad

Today's Projected Earnings: $22.29 + Bonuses: $1.50 = $23.79

Spoiler: Today's Projected Earnings Full Details

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

And yet you've still crushed my morning earnings.

 

[Jaded]

you woke yourself up.

No, I was sleeping all nicely and then heard a loud ping.

Your fault.

I will hold a grudge against you for at least the day.

 

[Peachy]

did it work?

it did. thank you for spreading awareness to the cause
positive vibes

 

[SweetiePuff]

Being geographically close to the server handing out the hits (better ping) and having low cycle times for PC play a role I imagine. 30+/- milliseconds might make the difference, it's the same concept as why wallstreet peeps go to such extreme measures with laying their own fiber and positioning their offices at certain places so they can gain a few ms extra internet speed.

whoa ... slow down, it's still early!

 

[C to the J]

Being geographically close to the server handing out the hits (better ping) and having low cycle times for PC play a role I imagine. 30+/- milliseconds might make the difference, it's the same concept as why wallstreet peeps go to such extreme measures with laying their own fiber and positioning their offices at certain places so they can gain a few ms extra internet speed.

It's a well thought out theory but I think it's more likely that Zoltars just suck.

 

[MostlyConfused]

Dumb question...Masters get a queue for 200?? Not 25?!?!

hahaha saw above response

NVM

 

[catnapped]

It's a well thought out theory but I think it's more likely that Zoltars just suck.

ynotboth.gif

 

[Definitely Not Riss]

No, I was sleeping all nicely and then heard a loud ping.

Your fault.

I will hold a grudge against you for at least the day.

Oh. It was probably time to get up anyhow. You're welcome.

 

[mordea]

What are you ISP stats?: http://www.speedtest.net/
In particular I'd be interested in know what your ping (latency) is?

Nothing special at all -- just shitty Time Warner Cable

Pinging google.com [172.217.4.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 34ms

Pinging mturk.com [72.21.206.80] with 32 bytes of data:
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 36ms, Average = 35ms

 

[Jaded]

Oh. It was probably time to get up anyhow. You're welcome.

I don't love you anymore.

 

[Not A Robot]

Being geographically close to the server handing out the hits (better ping) and having low cycle times for PC play a role I imagine. 30+/- milliseconds might make the difference, it's the same concept as why wallstreet peeps go to such extreme measures with laying their own fiber and positioning their offices at certain places so they can gain a few ms extra internet speed.

That settles it then, moving close to Zoltar and laying fiber.

 

[rjd66]

Nothing special at all -- just shitty Time Warner Cable

Pinging google.com [172.217.4.110] with 32 bytes of data:
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 32ms, Maximum = 39ms, Average = 34ms

Pinging mturk.com [72.21.206.80] with 32 bytes of data:
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 35ms, Maximum = 36ms, Average = 35ms

I live in the sticks and compaired to my internet that is blazing fast lol

 

[Pleco]

You do too know.

Minimum effort answer suggesting sheer contempt for voters. Okay you convinced me.

 

[kryss]

whoa ... slow down, it's still early!