01/23 - Moving Through Monday!

[catnapped]

Title: A fun two player card game | PANDA Requester: DM research [A2QFT3PXHK1ZBO] (Contact) TO: [Pay: 2.95] [Fair: 3.63] [Comm: 2.50] [Fast: 3.81] [Reviews: 44] [ToS: 0] Description: You get to play an exciting and fun card game, from which you may earn up to $4.25. You will receive $2 for playing three rounds (for approximately 40 minutes). Be the first player to get rid of your cards and win a $0.25 bonus for each win!!! In addition, you can continue playing three more rounds, earning $0.25 for each round played on top of the win bonus. Time: 3 hours 30 minutes HITs Available: 3 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.2.6​

 

[SweetiePuff]

Title: A fun two player card game | PANDA Requester: DM research [A2QFT3PXHK1ZBO] (Contact) TO: [Pay: 2.95] [Fair: 3.63] [Comm: 2.50] [Fast: 3.81] [Reviews: 44] [ToS: 0] Description: You get to play an exciting and fun card game, from which you may earn up to $4.25. You will receive $2 for playing three rounds (for approximately 40 minutes). Be the first player to get rid of your cards and win a $0.25 bonus for each win!!! In addition, you can continue playing three more rounds, earning $0.25 for each round played on top of the win bonus. Time: 3 hours 30 minutes HITs Available: 3 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.2.6​

 

[catnapped]

Title: Social interactions - 15 to 20 minute survey - psychology study | PANDA Requester: Social Psychology Experiment [AO02TOCBAPN7W] (Contact) TO: [Pay: 2.37] [Fair: 3.88] [Comm: 2.00] [Fast: 3.91] [Reviews: 143] [ToS: 2] Description: In this study we will ask you about your social interactions. This study should take 15 to 20 minutes Time: 1 hour HITs Available: 23 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.2.6​

 

[Quality Team]

Hey everyone, happy Monday! Gauging the overall quality of a group of images can be fairly subjective. For example, if some are really high quality and others are only OK, what's the best response? From the different tasks you've seen, do you have any suggestions of phrasing that helped you better understand what the question was really asking?

 

[electrolyte]

Hey everyone, happy Monday! Gauging the overall quality of a group of images can be fairly subjective. For example, if some are really high quality and others are only OK, what's the best response? From the different tasks you've seen, do you have any suggestions of phrasing that helped you better understand what the question was really asking?

Hi! To clarify, this is for the Pinterest HITs, correct? This requester account? https://turkopticon.ucsd.edu/reports?id=AURHK491L2LH6

 

[SweetiePuff]

Hey everyone, happy Monday! Gauging the overall quality of a group of images can be fairly subjective. For example, if some are really high quality and others are only OK, what's the best response? From the different tasks you've seen, do you have any suggestions of phrasing that helped you better understand what the question was really asking?

For what HIT specifically?

 

[SweetiePuff]

Hey everyone, happy Monday! Gauging the overall quality of a group of images can be fairly subjective. For example, if some are really high quality and others are only OK, what's the best response? From the different tasks you've seen, do you have any suggestions of phrasing that helped you better understand what the question was really asking?

Are these for the Pinterest "choose Group A/B" and then choose Group A/B which better represents the initial picture?

Or are you asking about another Pinterest HIT (spammy, relevant, inappropriate, etc)?

 

[catnapped]

Title: Read English sentences | PANDA Requester: Language Processing Lab [A2DAUVKB03LF3T] (Contact) TO: [Pay: 2.63] [Fair: 2.58] [Comm: 1.08] [Fast: 2.41] [Reviews: 27] [ToS: 0] Description: Read a series of English series and rate them Time: 1 hour HITs Available: 1 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: Already participated! DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.2.6​

 

[Quality Team]

Not for any specific HIT, but if we gave you this link and asked if the top 15 images were high quality, that might not be specific enough. Any chance you've seen better phrasing for that question?

 

[electrolyte]

https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/1342714?hl=en

Ah, yes. The good ol' "CLICK THE SHIELD".

 

[SweetiePuff]

Title: chat with a our guide | PANDA Requester: Seth [AVS5XNNUL0RZQ] (Contact) TO: [Pay: 3.69] [Fair: 5.00] [Comm: 3.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Reviews: 32] [ToS: 1] Description: have a meaningful chat of at least 10 turns(turn=back and forth) with my bot that simulates a Pandora world guide Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: NonDisclosure GreaterThan 0; Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.2.6​

 

[catnapped]

Title: chat with a our guide | PANDA Requester: Seth [AVS5XNNUL0RZQ] (Contact) TO: [Pay: 3.69] [Fair: 5.00] [Comm: 3.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Reviews: 32] [ToS: 1] Description: have a meaningful chat of at least 10 turns(turn=back and forth) with my bot that simulates a Pandora world guide Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: NonDisclosure GreaterThan 0; Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.2.6​

 

[Kerek]

Ah, yes. The good ol' "CLICK THE SHIELD".

 

[electrolyte]

Not for any specific HIT, but if we gave you this link and asked if the top 15 images were high quality, that might not be specific enough. Any chance you've seen better phrasing for that question?

I'd want to see some examples in the instructions about what you consider high quality vs. not high quality. I think the phrasing is fine.

 

[catnapped]

Nothing happens

 

[SweetiePuff]

Not for any specific HIT, but if we gave you this link and asked if the top 15 images were high quality, that might not be specific enough. Any chance you've seen better phrasing for that question?

I think that does leave it open to some subjectivity of the worker. If you are looking for more specific type responses I would include examples of high quality (professional), average (every day camera/phone users) and poor (blurry, off center, etc) examples in the instructions.

 

[Peachy]

how bad is the 2.50 food image/word study?

 

[Kerek]

Nothing happens

 

[DorthyZbornak]

Not for any specific HIT, but if we gave you this link and asked if the top 15 images were high quality, that might not be specific enough. Any chance you've seen better phrasing for that question?

I could see it many different ways. Provide examples of High quality/low quality, having an actual rating system (numbered with examples) or ask how many of the 10-15 would be considered high quality (with examples.) Really the question(s) depend on your example answers that follow as to how I as a turker will proceed.

 

[SweetiePuff]

Title: Are these job opportunities attractive to you? | PANDA Requester: Haylee [A1YR5JBJAX4LOK] (Contact) TO: [Pay: 3.00] [Fair: 2.33] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: 2.50] [Reviews: 11] [ToS: 0] Description: Read table descriptions about jobs and rate how attractive each job is for you. The survey will take 25 minute or less. Participants should be 18 years or older to participate. Time: 1 hour HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: Taken DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.2.6​