02/23 - The Cockchafer Thursday!

[Liz]

Caught this raw so knowing my luck it's gonna be awful

I just caught it too! Thank goodness in between doc this morning and my router issues I need to make some $$$

 

[TylerS]

TO Says an hour don't have time, so returning it.

Looked like a great hit too, damn.

 

[kryss]

Still coming in

Title: (Speakers with American Accents Only) - Record phrases using a microphone in your own voice at normal volume | PANDA Requester: Project Endor (Jamelio) [A25EIGL5N7278I] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.56] [Fair: 5.00] [Comm: 3.45] [Fast: 4.86] Description: - Time: 3 minutes(s) HITs Available: 48 Reward: $0.05 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location EqualTo US;

 

[tempo]

Sorry no. More coming soon (different tasks--Video Games). Same reward value and time expectations. I'll post more info when it's available.

I know, thanks. I just quoted your message in this thread so that others can see it. Can't wait for the next ones .

 

[MerryLou]

They just wrote me what's in the email, not sure honestly. Obviously random data would most likely be rejected. I used the script for them, most were done within about 22-25 seconds. 9 tweets to actually read. I don't think that's unreasonable, especially since you're getting the Gist of the tweet.

By missing attention checks you're pretty much broadcasting to them that you are sending random data, I mean, that's what they're there for. I think requesters need to stick to their guns; they say they have reasonable standards for attention checks and times, and if a worker doesn't meet them then their work should be rejected. It seems simple to me. I hate to see a decent requester railroaded into paying for bad work. (not @ you, just in general)

 

[ctraltDel]

Does anyone have a time on the juror HIT?

 

[MindNumbing]

Guess I am the only unlucky fool who cant catch one.

 

[kryss]

Title: Parents only: Baseline survey for voluntary UPenn study about your beliefs(~ 4 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Alison Buttenheim [A2FLTQMWYQWNM0] (Contact) (TO): [Pay: 4.09] [Fair: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fast: 4.90] Description: This is a voluntary, academic research study for parents only about your beliefs on certain topics. It takes about 2 minutes and you will receive $0.50 for participating, with up to a $1.50 bonus if eligible for the second part of this survey. Time: 45 minutes(s) HITs Available: 67 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 97; Exc: [31026713-34556] DoesNotExist; Location In US;

 

[SleepComa]

Guess I am the only unlucky fool who cant catch one.

Can you HAM a panda for it? I'll return mine right at 12:50

 

[TylerS]

By missing attention checks you're pretty much broadcasting to them that you are sending random data, I mean, that's what they're there for. I think requesters need to stick to their guns; they say they have reasonable standards for attention checks and times, and if a worker doesn't meet them then their work should be rejected. It seems simple to me. I hate to see a decent requester railroaded into paying for bad work. (not @ you, just in general)

? Ok, no...I didn't miss any attention checks. They have one set attention check in their posts, I can't say what it is of course, but it's obvious it's the same pattern. I did them correctly but too fast. That is what he's referencing there, I think between me editing out the part that gives the information away, and his wording, may have confused that point.

 

[TylerS]

And there were 3 of us, the other 2 much more senior members than me, that had x3 amount the rejections that i did. It was a speed thing.

Plus I offered to do free HITs for the one's he reverses. So he's technically getting 2x the data for the same price.

 

[YAHU]

Still coming in

hehe

 

[SleepComa]

Today's Projected Earnings: $63.63 + Bonuses: $4.25 = $67.88 (Exported from Mturk Suite v1.11.7)

Spoiler: Today's Projected Earnings - Overview

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

Now to finally start dem VacationAPI's

 

[MerryLou]

? Ok, no...I didn't miss any attention checks. They have one set attention check in their posts, I can't say what it is of course, but it's obvious it's the same pattern. I did them correctly but too fast. That is what he's referencing there, I think between me editing out the part that gives the information away, and his wording, may have confused that point.

"While the ~~~Removed as it describes the actual Quality Control check~~!, as you mentioned, is one of such quality checks, it is not the only; and, after reviewing your submissions again, it appears that some of your submissions did fail to meet these standards"

That seems like they're saying you missed some.

 

[MindNumbing]

Can you HAM a panda for it? I'll return mine right at 12:50

I can try my best

 

[Draper]

can you extend timer?

Timer is extended to 4 hours (from previous batches) so that everyone can post their work in time. However, the tasks themselves (x2) are timed at 30mins each for experimental purposes. The goal is not to get the "best" work, but to see how easy work is in this application. The application should make the task easy if it is composed well. If the task is not made easier, it's the tools fault, not workers.

Note that we do watch how much time people work within tasks and how quickly answers are posted. Real analysts don't get the answers to these tasks under 5 mins...

 

[SleepComa]

Returned.

 

[TylerS]

Just to clarify, did I miss any actual attention checks, or were you just implying the hits were done too quickly? I'm just wanting to make sure so that in the future I don't make the same mistakes.

One way to find out. Just sent them that email.

I guess I don't appreciate the implication is all. If it was just a "me" thing it'd be different. Their TO tells a different story.

 

[SleepComa]

Title: Code Completion Task | PANDA Requester: Perfomance and Logistics [A20SYZTPZTW8VC] (Contact) TO: [Pay: N/A] [Fair: N/A] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: N/A] [Reviews: 0] [ToS: 0] Description: Code Review and Correction ~ 1-2 hours Time: 24 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $10.00 Qualifications: Location EqualTo US;

HIT posted from Mturk Suite v1.11.7​

 

[lavender63]

Returning now