03/10 - Transparent Head Thursday!

[TQueen]

You're gonna have to step up your picture game if you want the bonuses.

Like...what kind of pictures?

 

[GenericPear]

.50s are too much work imo.
.15s and .20s are

ahh good looking out

 

[C to the J]

Like...what kind of pictures?

 

[bxpretzel]

You've received a bonus from ProExam for work related to 3CRWSLD91KM68KL1EAC2LPOKKG6OMR.
The value of your bonus is: $1.00 USD

The Requester included this note:
No comment provided by Requester.

 

[Bode "Emo Barry" Miller]

Yeah, but it's implied. How about all of those sergeys where you had to do all of that stuff on youtube then take screenshots of your histories and provide links and stuff. I'd say that kind of goes against the spirit of Amazon's stance on worker anonymity.

It's not implied. Most of the YouTube hits do not require you to have a Youtube account to actually do the work. my point is that I was just defending the google hits in general when you grouped them as a whole and it's a significantly smaller subset of hits that they post that would break the TOS (and while every once in a while it asks for an email or something, it takes a big stretch to classify others as TOS violations)

 

[Jaded]

That was also only halfway through it too...

EDIT: Tempted to reject you out of spite.

 

[bxpretzel]

wtf

 

[Princess Gina Marie]

@TQueen is fox ridge worth it?

 

[TQueen]

@TQueen is fox ridge worth it?

It's meh, nothing to write home about. I'd do Papa John's over that.

 

[saqfish]

Boy, Remember Embers Light Inside Gowns.

 

[aveline]

It's not implied. Most of the YouTube hits do not require you to have a Youtube account to actually do the work. my point is that I was just defending the google hits in general when you grouped them as a whole and it's a significantly smaller subset of hits that they post that would break the TOS (and while every once in a while it asks for an email or something, it takes a big stretch to classify others as TOS violations)

Well, to be fair, I did say much of the google stuff, not most or all. It seems like we're just arguing over semantics. I didn't mean to imply that the majority of google's HITs violate the TOS.

 

[Princess Gina Marie]

It's meh, nothing to write home about. I'd do Papa John's over that.

Thank you for not speaking in code with me you're lucky I wasn't asking for right now

 

[Bode "Emo Barry" Miller]

Well, to be fair, I did say much of the google stuff, not most or all. It seems like we're just arguing over semantics. I didn't mean to imply that the majority of google's HITs violate the TOS.

*turns his attention back towards instigating with @kryssyy*

 

[PhantomCatt]

For my teacher peeps

Title: Classroom teacher (K-5) survey | PANDA Requester: Miaskiewicz Tomasz [A3B4URY7LRKOEO] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 5.00 Communicativity★★★★★ 4.75 Generosity★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 4 TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: The survey results will help us design an active learning product for K-5 classrooms. The survey will take approximately 3-5 minutes to complete. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.75 Qualifications: Location is US

 

[Zodiac]

Get you 16 cents. (What a joke)

Title: Judge privacy preference of an user | PANDA Requester: Taraneh [A6J4KL5UQG28P] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 0.00 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.00 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 4 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Judge privacy preference of an user and judge whether the tweets contain private and sensitive information by choosing one or more categories that are provided. Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 2411 Reward: $0.16 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95

 

[TQueen]

Thank you for not speaking in code with me you're lucky I wasn't asking for right now

...what?

 

[kryss]

*turns his attention back towards instigating with @kryssyy*

Remember when @electrolyte flipped you off?

 

[Bode "Emo Barry" Miller]

wrong thread @kryssyy

don't think I didn't see that

 

[kryss]

wrong thread @kryssyy

shaddap

 

[Zodiac]

shaddap