03/13 - The Secret of NIMH Tuesday

[Roscoe E Goldchain]

Acc: 41/949

Hamming all afternoon.

I used to like you

 

[ChristopherASA]

I started using Hit Forker during the switch to the new site and I like it.

Very much appreciate the input!

 

[C to the J]

I used to like you

I'm trying to help!

Saying nothing else running, ham on.

 

[savvy]

A million effing csats today and I cant catch one

Actually I gave up a long time ago

I've never done a c-sat. I've tried catching them before but meh

 

[Roscoe E Goldchain]

I'm trying to help!

Saying nothing else running, ham on.

lol just caught one with ham

 

[micky]

OK, if it's a grammar HIT and they post this is makes me wary...

"If you loose it"

 

[LittleDrummerBoy]

lol just caught one with ham

They still worth it? I was browsing through the thread in a rush this morning, but I thought I read about them adding more writing requirements or something. Never been a huge fan of C-sats, but money is money!

 

[Starslip]

Title: Short survey about opinions(~ 5 minutes) | Accept Requester: Rebecca Ponce de Leon [A1YGC8M4CGBLKY] Contact TV: [Hrly: $15.24] [Pay: 4.45] [Fast: null] [Comm: 5.00] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0] TO: [Pay: 3.50] [Fast: 4.00] [Comm: 1.00] [Fair: 4.00] [Reviews: 7] [ToS: 0] TO2: [Hrly: $10.11] [Pen: 1.00 days] [Res: ---] [Rec: 100% of 2] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $0.40 Duration: 30 minutes Available: 23 Description: 5 minutes, pays $0.40 Requirements: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Exc: [2433608-78476] DoesNotExist; Location In US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.1.17​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[tricker]

Yea but they were also being automated and getting done at the rate of 5k an hour.

This batch if it was art prints would be done in 4 hours.
Instead it's going to last probably 12 hours.

Automated? Oh. Hm. I had no clue.

 

[themildone]

Title: Assessing if Tweets are Political BATCH_3 (WARNING: This HIT may contain adult content. Worker discretion is advised) | Accept Requester: Kenny Joseph [A2R8YZGVET694Y] Contact TO: [Pay: 4.83] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 5.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 6] [ToS: 0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: $1.50 Duration: 1 hour Available: 20 Description: A link to a qualtrics survey, which asks whether or not the content of 100 tweets was relevant in some way to U.S. politics or the 2016 U.S. election (~12 mins.) Requirements: Total approved HITs GreaterThan 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US; Adult Content Qualification EqualTo 1 [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.1.17​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[SarahAshlee90]

Acc: 41/949

Hamming all afternoon.

Have you, or anyone else for that matter, ever figure out what the 949 means?

 

[LittleDrummerBoy]

OK, if it's a grammar HIT and they post this is makes me wary...

"If you loose it"

Reminds me of this from yesterday

Title:Three interlectual tasks on financial policies followed by a financial decision question

Have you, or anyone else for that matter, ever figure out what the 949 means?

It's how many times it has searched for that job in total The first number being how many were accepted/caught.

 

[MarkC]

The problem is requesters who think they're being fair by having majority rules hits.I know lots of turkers are good, smart people, but with this workforce and with the kind of day-in day-out random jack of all trades work we do here, majority rules is the farthest thing from fair.

For sure. If for example their system flags anything that is wildly different from the majority and they investigate and reject based on that, I'm fine with. Anything that helps them reject non-quality work and weed out scammers I'm all for. The problem comes when they use these tools unfairly. Like I finished a 30 minute survey too quickly. Sorry for being able to read quickly. I went through your 5 pages of repetitive bubbles reading the questions, passing all of the attention checks. That one I don't get. I don't even rush or try and go fast. But yeah flat out mass rejecting solely based on majority rules, no thanks.

 

[C to the J]

Have you, or anyone else for that matter, ever figure out what the 949 means?

How many times it pinged it and saw it was there visible on the marketplace I believe.
Not how many were possible to get.

 

[electrolyte]

Title: simple 11 question survey | Accept Requester: Lee-Hyun [A25PT23PD2HMYE] Contact TV: [Hrly: $16.66] [Pay: 4.40] [Fast: null] [Comm: null] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Blk: 0] TO: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 1] [ToS: 0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: $0.25 Duration: 10 minutes Available: 1 Description: survey Requirements: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.1.17​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[SarahAshlee90]

Reminds me of this from yesterday



It's how many times it has searched for that job in total The first number being how many were accepted/caught.

Then why is there a
| [srch:0]
next to it? Isnt that the search total?

 

[ChristopherASA]

They still worth it? I was browsing through the thread in a rush this morning, but I thought I read about them adding more writing requirements or something. Never been a huge fan of C-sats, but money is money!

Writing??? In a C-Sats???? Perhaps C-Sats need an operation.

 

[humbleturker]

Oh lookie, a little blood geyser. There's something you don't see everyday.

 

[SweetiePuff]

A million effing csats today and I cant catch one

Actually I gave up a long time ago

It's ok, I'm catching them for you, fam

 

[MarkC]

I'm trying it out and it seems to be omitting about 80% of what I see on HF and HS, am I missing something?

I don't think I really messed with anything when I set it up. Maybe I've been missing out on 80% on whats available to me crap now I'm worried.