04/02 - Thalassic Thursday

[KatieinPGH]

Can tell that people are starting to get fed up with requesters and short tempered. I'm noticing more and more "no holding back" reviews on HIT's lately. Many of which I do agree with. But, a few are either from a different version of the HIT, or people that are trying to rush through and not read the info page before returning with a crappy review.

 

[Blakkat]

Title: Demographic & Opinion Survey(~ 3 minutes) | Accept Requester: Joseph Johnson [A13BSOVTZWWBX7] Contact TV: [Hrly=$29.53] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Good] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=4.86] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=4.00] [Reviews=10] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.45 Duration: 15:00 Available: 23 Description: 3 minute demographic and opinion survey Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

 

[afallstarxfall]

Title: Demographic & Opinion Survey(~ 3 minutes) | Accept Requester: Joseph Johnson [A13BSOVTZWWBX7] Contact TV: [Hrly=$29.78] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Good] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=4.86] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=4.00] [Reviews=10] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.45 Duration: 15:00 Available: 23 Description: 3 minute demographic and opinion survey Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

 

[Blakkat]

Title: Collaborative English Sentence Simplification | Accept Requester: Connor [A3JTJXYPL2RIDP] Contact TV: [Hrly=$21.88] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=1.00] [Fast=0.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=0.00] [Reviews=1] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 1.55 Duration: 25:00 Available: 0 Description: (5-15 minute task) Computer Science Researchers at Pomona College are studying the benefits collaborative sentence simplification. Workers must be fluent English speakers. You must collaborate with a partner to simplify five sentences. Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

 

[C to the J]

Can tell that people are starting to get fed up with requesters and short tempered. I'm noticing more and more "no holding back" reviews on HIT's lately. Many of which I do agree with. But, a few are either from a different version of the HIT, or people that are trying to rush through and not read the info page before returning with a crappy review.

My favorites are when people put a screener warning when there is no screener and they just failed an attention check but didn't realize it.

 

[rsmath]

Avoid the Gale Payne -Graduate Student Survey - U.S. Politics.

I got all the way to the very end, to the "Your response has been recorded"

She rejected my hit for not being in her demographic, after stringing me through the whole survey.

No response to email.

99.8% approval until now

if that is the one from late last night, sounds like a good thing i got screened out after a few demo questions and about 30 secs of my time.

 

[afallstarxfall]

Title: RRR Study | Accept Requester: Reserach A [AO6O9C9M1QALL] Contact TV: [Hrly=$7.85] [Pay=Low] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=2.00] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=3] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 1.00 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 0 Description: This is a research survey study. It must be completed in one sitting and requires questions responses as well as written sections. The study takes approximately 15 minutes. Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

 

[Lumius]

if that is the one from late last night, sounds like a good thing i got screened out after a few demo questions and about 30 secs of my time.

Yeah, I sent her an email about requester procedures. Normally, you screen someone out and give them a message. Don't let them finish, and then just reject them once you meet your criteria. It's just a waste of both of our time. If you have met your quota for a demographic, take it down.

I totally don't mind getting screened out. What I do mind is people wasting my time, taking my data for free, and not communicating.

 

[SisphyeanTurker]

There any way to clear HIT Tracker data? I think it's got some old HITs as pending earnings from a few months back and I want to get a more accurate reflection of what payment I still have yet to receive.

 

[femmebritt]

Title: Consumer decision making(~ 2 minutes) | PANDA
Requester: Boston Decision Laboratory [A15HTJTGHH26A2] [TurkerView]
Description: A 1-2 minute survey on decision making
Duration: ~20min
Reward: $0.25
Qualifications:

• Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100
• Exc: [183296976-207915] DoesNotExis
• HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95
• Location In US

HIT Time: 1 min, 31 sec
Catchability: Great

 

[mew]

Spoiler: Qual Test

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

 

[C to the J]

 

[JCIII]

Tell Us About You

Nice $7.50 hit
Long timer and I did it in 27 minutes, I wish they were all like this.

 

[ccmet121]

Was 3 questions short of the 20 dollar bonus on the Cultural Evolution hit. fml

 

[C to the J]

Was 3 questions short of the 20 dollar bonus on the Cultural Evolution hit. fml

 

[PandaThief]

Tell Us About You

Nice $7.50 hit
Long timer and I did it in 27 minutes, I wish they were all like this.

returned that twice, gonna do it when i catch it again

 

[Dottie]

returned that twice, gonna do it when i catch it again

Great hit, took 22 minutes. All bubbles. Why did you return it? o.o

 

[themildone]

returned that twice, gonna do it when i catch it again

definitely worth it. it's boring but doesn't last too terribly long, and the questions auto-advance so that's nice

 

[WorkAholic311]

Was 3 questions short of the 20 dollar bonus on the Cultural Evolution hit. fml

Me too, even though it was just a catch...Hehehe!

 

[PandaThief]

Great hit, took 22 minutes. All bubbles. Why did you return it? o.o

no reviews and i try to stay away from high paying hits with no reviews