I...I don't know. I sent a message requesting clarification, but doubt I'll receive a reply with OCMP's track record for being non-communicative.
The "review model results" leads me to believe that we're reviewing the work of others to see if they got it right/wrong. Due to that and the wording in the instructions, I don't think we're to make any changes. So unless I'm wrong (which is totally possible) we're to read through and mark n/a if the information is not correct, without making any changes. So in the instance of the dates being in one field and the title is in another field, we would mark n/a in the sections that were missing/incorrect and move on to the next field.
Did that make sense..? Basically, we're reviewers and using n/a to mark incorrect fields and then submitting, I do believe.