07/10 - Milksteak Monday

HIT Poster Award Voting

  • Squatty

    Votes: 50 35.0%
  • bxpretzel

    Votes: 23 16.1%
  • ElleWoods

    Votes: 23 16.1%
  • Roscoe E Goldchain

    Votes: 18 12.6%
  • coffeeowl

    Votes: 29 20.3%

  • Total voters
    143
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

loki3404

So Corporate
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
8,264
Reaction score
24,065
Points
1,013
Location
NYC
Gender
Male
>In particular, we find that from 24% to 83% of those passing the screener questions are impostors, and that deceit occurs in 49–89% of those who are “eligible” to misrepresent

This is incredibly depressing. I've returned so many fucking HITs because I knew I did not qualify at all. Makes me feel like this is a hopeless endeavor if the requester/worker relationship is going to be this antagonistic.

(Though they also did not mention, at all, fraudulent requesters, and seemed to solely focus on how awful MTurk workers are for daring to talk about their MTurk experiences in a public area...)
They more or less compare communities to trade unions.

Overall, the MTurk online forums help workers transform a difficult job of responding to studies into one that is more predictable, pleasant, and economically justifiable. In that way, forums benefit requesters by increasing the willingness of people to participate in research studies. Forums also encourage requesters to act in ways that support the joint system. In particular, the forums penalize requesters who pay a low hourly wage (Gleibs 2016), those who underreport the expected length of the study, those who annoy workers with unexpected or boring tasks, and those who block workers unjustifiably (Brawley and Pury 2016).
 

Pleco

Friendly Neighborhood Rat
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 23, 2016
Messages
19,190
Reaction score
76,218
Points
1,588
Age
38
Gender
Male
" We should make clear in our research that no matter how badly you talk about Mturk workers, you will never surpass their ability for self-hatred, so just go to town"
 

Shockwave

Member
Joined
Jun 2, 2017
Messages
105
Reaction score
425
Points
263
Location
Pennsylvania
Gender
Female
I did not read it that way, and they also say the forums benefit requesters.
I understand I was being a bit hyperbolic, but reading further into the study they made a lot of mention of how forums are used to manipulate the outcomes of data and seemed suspicious about forums in general and recommended more requesters monitor them (which imo would be really great) In any case this study seems focused only on research-based HITs and not other stuff like transcription tasks or other verifications.

>While the forums restore some of the balance of power between requesters and Turkers, they may also discourage requesters from appropriately rejecting or blocking truly offending workers from their studies.

I guess this bugged me a bit too.
 

Squatty

.
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
21,286
Reaction score
44,989
Points
2,538
Age
36
Gender
Female
  • Like
Reactions: Rerun

JenniLeigh

Batch Betta Have My Money
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
23,084
Reaction score
46,895
Points
1,388
Location
my napping spot
Gender
Female
Instead of working, I'm watching a million Prime Day deals. I feel it's a good use of my time.
I'm trying to do both.

Need back to school stuff, kids clothes as cheap as possible (gonna end up getting second hand, but I can hope...) it's sock & undies stock up time....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rerun and Vanyanka

Kerek

Red Cat-Bear
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
65,201
Reaction score
145,743
Points
2,088
Gender
Male
I understand I was being a bit hyperbolic, but reading further into the study they made a lot of mention of how forums are used to manipulate the outcomes of data and seemed suspicious about forums in general and recommended more requesters monitor them (which imo would be really great) In any case this study seems focused only on research-based HITs and not other stuff like transcription tasks or other verifications.

>While the forums restore some of the balance of power between requesters and Turkers, they may also discourage requesters from appropriately rejecting or blocking truly offending workers from their studies.

I guess this bugged me a bit too.
But all of that stuff about workers on forums is true. Posts are edited on a (near?) daily basis here, let alone across the totality of the forums. Workers aren't saints and are responsible for a lot of the problems with mturk (as shown by the study itself).

And requesters absolutely should reject and block more. If you cheat your way into a study, you are a thief and a liar, and harm other workers and the requester.
 
Last edited:

Squatty

.
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
21,286
Reaction score
44,989
Points
2,538
Age
36
Gender
Female
Title: Answer a survey about your opinions on pro-social products | PANDA
Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester
Requester: Katy Johnson [A1AL9PLY47959O] (Contact)
TO 1: Not Available
TO 2: Not Available
Description: We are conducting an academic survey about products that are pro-social in nature (meaning, they are associated with some kind of social good or social cause).
Time: 30 minutes
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $0.50
Qualifications: Masters has been granted; Location is US;
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.11
 
  • Like
Reactions: Leon Powalski
Status
Not open for further replies.