- Joined
- Sep 16, 2016
- Messages
- 10,324
- Reaction score
- 18,600
- Points
- 1,238
- Age
- 38
- Gender
- Male
I've gotten 3 completely blank review ones so far. Someone has a very clumsy and fat finger.
If someone says in the response that the account will be locked in 28,800 seconds, is this allowed? Thanks.I've seen someone putting 24 hours, which isn't listed in the directions. Also a link that wasn't listed in the email.
I would assume 8 hours is okay as it's in one of the examples.
Title: Answer a survey about your attitudes towards body shape | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: ESClabs [A1U8RL0GPUGR86] (Contact) TO 1: Not Available TO 2: Not Available Description: Complete a brief 5-minute survey about your attitudes to body shape for $1 Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 156 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is one of: AU, CA, GB, NZ, US; |
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.11 |
They change all of the time. Go to the hits available to you page. Search by most available and check the TO of all the top results.If I just wanted to make some numbers, who is a good reliable requester that does .01 batches? Thanking you in advance!
You don't have to apologize for anything! You made an ON-TOPIC post, and your points were valid. You didn't finger-point, nor did you wrongly accuse. You just said, "hey, this is what I think!" And honestly, your opinion means more to me than a lot of other folks'.I wish to apologize, because apparently I was wrong. Knowing that the intention of the batches is to refine results for Pinterest users (and being a Pinterest user), it seemed clear to me that the pins in the last beauty batch were style-related rather than beauty-related. I spoke up about it, and a couple of others also noticed the discrepancy and stopped doing them. It was wrong of me to imply that the study that mentioned workers not paying attention applied to this particular batch event. It did not occur to me that things were less clear to others. I meant no offense and if I did offend anyone, I truly apologize.
Title: Support Bot Training | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Eric Sites [A395R40FJDRGLV] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.08] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 4.33] [Fair: 4.67] [Reviews: 14] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $7.34/hr] [Pen: 0.02 days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 75% of 4] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: Help train a support bot, follow the supplied writing prompt to come up with 5 possible questions and then supply acceptable answers to those questions based on the supplied scenario. Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 517 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Adult Content Qualification is 1; |
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.11 |
I haven't caught one either. They must be being gobbled upI guess since I can't catch any sites reviews, I'll go finish my nails.
You can help with my nails if you want.I haven't caught one either. They must be being gobbled up
Title: Wisdom of the crowd wanted: Marketing Project | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Pocket Gardener [AE0N9H9BYWJ1L] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.00] [Fast: 4.50] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 3.00] [Reviews: 5] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $11.65/hr] [Pen: 2.00 days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: -- of 0] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: Your task will be to develop a marketing plan together with two other "Turkers", as we want to profit from the "wisdom of the crowd". As this is part of a research project, you will also be asked a few questions before and after working on the task. Time: 1 hour 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $4.50 Qualifications: None; |
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.11 |
3 more than me!I did five and lost all interest.
Enjoy.
I wish to apologize, because apparently I was wrong. Knowing that the intention of the batches is to refine results for Pinterest users (and being a Pinterest user), it seemed clear to me that the pins in the last beauty batch were style-related rather than beauty-related. I spoke up about it, and a couple of others also noticed the discrepancy and stopped doing them. It was wrong of me to imply that the study that mentioned workers not paying attention applied to this particular batch event. It did not occur to me that things were less clear to others. I meant no offense and if I did offend anyone, I truly apologize.
Couldn't agree more, i was on the opposite side of the discussion and i dont think you said anything wrong.You don't have to apologize for anything! You made an ON-TOPIC post, and your points were valid. You didn't finger-point, nor did you wrongly accuse. You just said, "hey, this is what I think!" And honestly, your opinion means more to me than a lot of other folks'.
I just saw your posts as a way to talk to my friend @minkyboodle. I missed her.
:yellowheart::heart::greenheart::blueheart: