- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Messages
- 20,910
- Reaction score
- 61,580
- Points
- 1,488
It should be called :nancy:It always looked like that. Hopefully in January, 2017, it will be turned into by @aveline.
EDIT ._.
Last edited:
It should be called :nancy:It always looked like that. Hopefully in January, 2017, it will be turned into by @aveline.
Dodds is OCMP, but I didn't realize he still used that qual? I haven't seen it in a long time.it is still used on Dodds, though, which is an average/good requester. As odd and rare as it might actually be, the fact that its still usable is there. I think that'd be a perfect time to use a "fairness" rating of 3-4, taking into account the time wasted on a screener, rather than using it as a 1 or 5 reject/accepted switch like TO seems to do.
that being said, TO is basically an afterthought at this point anyway, unfortunately
From now I do not read sarcasm and take every post at face value, from everyone. It make my day happy.your disdain for the whole forum while continuing to use it is curious
your disdain for the whole forum while continuing to use it is curious
Title: Short experiment about understanding Others' Behavior | PANDA Requester: Social Cognitive Science Research Center [AGNA99S29MTHA] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 4.17 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.26 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.93 Promptness Number of Reviews: 83 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Answer questions as part of a psychology experiment at Brown University. 2-3 minutes. ($.30) Time: 55 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95 |
From now I do not read sarcasm and take every post at face value, from everyone. It make my day happy.
yeah, he uses returned % still, in varying amounts. ProductRNR, too, for whatever that's worth.Dodds is OCMP, but I didn't realize he still used that qual? I haven't seen it in a long time.
TO has been thinking about changing their rating system into a series of yes/no questions rather than the current system. They take forever to do anything though -- not sure it will ever happen.
Title: Your Opinion on Business Ethics Case(~ 4 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Carly [A2W1PWCSB0QW6] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 5.00 Generosity ★★★★★ 0.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 0.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 1 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Quick survey on your opinions about a business case study Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.70 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100;Exc: [17271-16682] has not been granted;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90;Location is one of: US |
And it's time to go.
Speaking of RnRs, it's a desperate day when I do them.yeah, he uses returned % still, in varying amounts. ProductRNR, too, for whatever that's worth.
I've also seen some other HITs pop up recently with expiration % quals, not sure where they're getting their information from, but its out there
fuckin wood background is the worst, even worse than light theme
I'll admit that there was something of a trick to cooking it properly in the microwave. tastes much better in the oven. That said, these aren't exactly high class meals, lol.. but enjoyable junkfood is ok every now and then.I for one, would love to consume pounds of buffalo style chicken strips, and fries, and corn, with a brownie dessert.
Clearly severe digestive issues.