12/16 - Freaky Friday!

[swimmeyfish]

Title: Product to Interest Audit (single yes/no per HIT) | PANDA Requester: Amazon Requester Inc. - Customer Interests [A225CX8SZ86ADP] (Contact) (TO):[Pay: 3.37][Fair: 5.00][Comm: 0.00][Fast: 4.60] Description: Confirm labeling of products with interest (e.g. 'underwater photography', 'game of thrones' etc). Single yes/no per HIT, average estimated time < 5 seconds. Time: 5 minutes Hits Available: 96 Reward: $0.01 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, Location is one of: CA, US, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 98

Can't find a script :/

 

[hyway]

Yes
x=3;

2x+3x = 15
2*3 + 3*3 = 15
6 + 9 = 15
15 = 15

x(2+3) = 15
3 * (2+3) = 15
3 * (5) = 15
15 = 15

And we aren't shooting for the moon anymore, the new target is Mars.

Right, its implied multiplication. This article does the best job of explaining all this, but here is the key point for me ...

If it “feels” natural to you that implied multiplication takes precedence over division (whether because it’s next to a parentheses or not), then you would get 6 ÷ 2(1+2) = 6 ÷ (2(3)) = 6 ÷ 6 = 1. That answer would be incorrect on most U.S. standardized tests, but you wouldn’t necessarily be wrong. (Insert rant against standardized tests here.) You would just be in the minority about which convention you’re using.

http://www.slate.com/articles/health_and_science/science/2013/03/facebook_math_problem_why_pemdas_doesn_t_always_give_a_clear_answer.html

I am a minority

 

[Roscoe E Goldchain]

@Roscoe E Goldchain

Say no more
On my way

 

[clickhappier]

You may only complete ONE HIT. Please do not queue hits or you will slow down study completion and delay payment. SRSLY? My queue is none of your business.

They were trying to say "If you accept more than 1 of the HITs in this group, we're just going to make you return the extras, so don't bother."

 

[Starslip]

They were trying to say "If you accept more than 1 of the HITs in this group, we're just going to make you return the extras, so don't bother."

And that you holding onto them when you can't do them prevents other people from being able to do them.

 

[TQueen]

Say no more
On my way

 

[Starslip]

I'm gonna agree with 9. Although I find it kind of ridiculous that you can get two different "valid" answers because the order of operations is done differently now than it used to be.

 

[Timinator]

Looking like this will be the final version. (Besides maybe adding a search tab)

Definitely plus plus. Do you think it may be relevant to add time it took to take? Like say it took you 3 mins 2 sec, maybe it could save and add to it? Don't know if that's a dumb idea or not.

 

[Timinator]

Today's Projected Earnings: $25.78 (Exported from Mturk Suite)

Spoiler: Today's Projected Earnings Full Details

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

 

[Kadauchi]

Definitely plus plus. Do you think it may be relevant to add time it took to take? Like say it took you 3 mins 2 sec, maybe it could save and add to it? Don't know if that's a dumb idea or not.

The issue is that its hard to track that and its easily messed up. First you have surveys. You can't use how long the HIT tab is focused for these because you are working in another tab. Then you have batches, where the time to complete the HIT is generally how long that window was focused for. Its a mess and while it can be somewhat completed it isn't all that accurate. You could make it so the timer keep running for the HIT unless another HIT was viewed, but then you could open a bunch of surveys from your queue at once, look at a few and mess the tracking up there.

 

[Starslip]

edit: nope I'm wrong ignore my pemdas :whistle:

 

[Timinator]

The issue is that its hard to track that and its easily messed up. First you have surveys. You can't use how long the HIT tab is focused for these because you are working in another tab. Then you have batches, where the time to complete the HIT is generally how long that window was focused for. Its a mess and while it can be somewhat completed it isn't all that accurate. You could make it so the timer keep running for the HIT unless another HIT was viewed, but then you could open a bunch of surveys from your queue at once, look at a few and mess the tracking up there.

Ok that makes sense

 

[SweetiePuff]

*note to self* Check timer on Wills before walking away and assuming it was a 10hr timer.

 

[hyway]

edit: nope I'm wrong ignore my pemdas :whistle:

 

[SweetiePuff]

edit: nope I'm wrong ignore my pemdas :whistle:

 

[kryss]

edit: nope I'm wrong ignore my pemdas :whistle:

:o

I saw that

 

[Timinator]

@Kadauchi hey sorry to bug you again, but I was looking at your github and saw Turk Plus...what does that feature?

 

[Jerami]

The issue is that its hard to track that and its easily messed up. First you have surveys. You can't use how long the HIT tab is focused for these because you are working in another tab. Then you have batches, where the time to complete the HIT is generally how long that window was focused for. Its a mess and while it can be somewhat completed it isn't all that accurate. You could make it so the timer keep running for the HIT unless another HIT was viewed, but then you could open a bunch of surveys from your queue at once, look at a few and mess the tracking up there.

I think TurkAssist had a feature like that. It was always wrong for all of those reasons.

 

[Kadauchi]

Fancy tooltips for AA too.

@Kadauchi hey sorry to bug you again, but I was looking at your github and saw Turk Plus...what does that feature?

Nothing, it was the first iteration of MTS.

I think TurkAssist had a feature like that. It was always wrong for all of those reasons.

Yup.

 

[T. Leela]

May I please have script

I'm sorry my son came over right after I posted this, and I didn't see this. it's an ahk script, all it really does is lets you use the arrow keys with out the ctrl button with it and hit hit alt for...something that makes it quicker, to go to the next one? Do you still want it?