08/21 - Tensorflow Tuesday!

[jklmnop]

It's time for everyone to move on from this topic.

 

[mboone73]

It's time for everyone to move on from this topic.

It's distraction bird's slightly heavier cousin, distraction pig.

 

[katarina]

Hey guys, how's it goi- ......................

 

[TSolo315]

I don't do underpaid work.

I have a few bad reviews for stuff I knew was shit going into it, but the vast, vast majority of surveys I do are > 12/hour

So I haven't left HIT reviews for a long time and am a little out of the loop on how it works, but I guess what I'm getting at is if people aren't leaving enough bad reviews for shitty HITs it significantly weakens the power of the system.

Are there enough people trudging though the shitty work to leave the bad reviews? Can you leave a review on a HIT you realize is shitty but don't finish?

 

[thismegan]

 

[Starslip]

Can you leave a review on a HIT you realize is shitty but don't finish?

I'm actually uncertain about that too. It looks like no, since you can't leave reviews directly on the tv site but have to do it through the addon, which only logs the HIT to be reviewed after you finish. Am I wrong?

 

[zabby]

Whooo I've hit my $50.00 goal for the week and its only Tuesday!

 

[The Great Bread]

It's distraction bird's slightly heavier cousin, distraction pig.

Post distractions you say?!

 

[A6_Foul_Out]

if people aren't leaving enough bad reviews for shitty HITs it significantly weakens the power of the system.

I mean your brain is the first line of defense.
If it looks, smells, and appears to be garbage, you likely don't need a TV review to tell you what you've already figured out.

After that, most survey stuff that appears reasonable to do gets reviewed. I'm not a person to get suckered into doing crap, or finishing it often, but some people do. You can't review stuff you haven't done, that'd just lead to more abuse than it's worth.

Are there enough people trudging though the shitty work to leave the bad reviews?

enough people are treading through the 8-12$ crap so that you can avoid it, yes.

Should you check a 8-12$/hourly review to make sure somebody kinda slow hasn't done it? probably.

anything paying less you should be able to discern just using your brain/experience.

 

[jklmnop]

Post distractions you say?!

ok that is wild.

 

[Michele]

Title: User Test, Requires Mic, Windows or Mac, 836a3129 | Accept Requester: SoundingBox (Change Sciences Group) [A1DIWKR9NEY82N] Contact TV: [Hrly=$11.47] [Pay=4.00] [Fast=4.00] [Comm=null] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.41] [Fast=3.87] [Comm=3.59] [Fair=4.12] [Reviews=158] [ToS=24] TO2: [Hrly=6.82] [Pen=0.25 days] [Res=100%] [Rec=38%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=3] Reward: 10.00 Duration: 7200 Available: 1 Description: Perform a user test on a website. It's fun and your opinion matters! Microphone required. Qualifications: StudyGroupExclusion - c81eeab9-9a03-4dd6-b78a-c3172e39a2d8 DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 97; Location In US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.3.7​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[Starslip]

I can't catch a damned thing

 

[TSolo315]

I mean your brain is the first line of defense.
If it looks, smells, and appears to be garbage, you likely don't need a TV review to tell you what you've already figured out.

After that, most survey stuff that appears reasonable to do gets reviewed. I'm not a person to get suckered into doing crap, or finishing it often, but some people do. You can't review stuff you haven't done, that'd just lead to more abuse than it's worth.


enough people are treading through the 8-12$ crap so that you can avoid it, yes.

anything paying less you should be able to discern just using your brain/experience.

I mean I agree, but you and me have a lot of experience with this kind of thing and can make good educated guesses to the quality of a survey. For newbies (the primary users of these review services) seeing the red $4.00/hr would be pretty helpful -- but that would require someone (hopefully several someones) to leave that review.

Just to be clear I'm not judging you for not completing shitty surveys to leave bad reviews

I do think this is a flaw in the system though that could be improved on, you should be able to leave reviews for unfinished HITs.

 

[TSolo315]

you should be able to leave reviews for unfinished HITs.

Or maybe at least let vetted members do so.

 

[KillMoles]

This looks good from the time estimates, 30min or so.

HIT Title: Complete a web-based training course and answer questions about the training content. -- PANDA Requester: Bradford Mott Average Hourly Rate: NA Time: 180 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $8.00

1 hour 23 min for me

 

[Kennedy]

I need these in my life. Preferably with garlic butter.

 

[ecko]

1 hour 23 min for me

ouch, they must have different ones then because mine took 40min.

 

[A6_Foul_Out]

seeing the red $4.00/hr would be pretty helpful

eh, think of TV as "seeing the good" as opposed to the goal of TO which is to avoid the bad.

Or maybe at least let vetted members do so.

come review a survey, just one

 

[C to the J]

I mean I agree, but you and me have a lot of experience with this kind of thing and can make good educated guesses to the quality of a survey. For newbies (the primary users of these review services) seeing the red $4.00/hr would be pretty helpful -- but that would require someone (hopefully several someones) to leave that review.

Just to be clear I'm not judging you for not completing shitty surveys to leave bad reviews

I do think this is a flaw in the system though that could be improved on, you should be able to leave reviews for unfinished HITs.

Ideally requesters could just be accurate with their estimates in the first place.
Though I do love the surprise when a survey says 60 min and it takes 8.

 

[A6_Foul_Out]

Though I do love the surprise when a survey says 60 min and it takes 8.

only when they pay for 60 though