10/09 - Double Dare Tuesday!

[charlie]

Title: Answer a survey about your opinions and use of Twitter | PANDA Requester: Joanna Sin [AL6WCQM44PPLS] (Req TV): N/A (TO): [Pay: N/A] [Fair: N/A] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: N/A] Description: A survey about opinions of the Twitter information environment and the use of Twitter Time: 45 minutes(s) HITs Available: 1 Reward: $5.00 Qualifications: Age - 18 - 25 EqualTo 0; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Location EqualTo US; Twitter Account Holder EqualTo 1;

well this should interesting. i didn't see the age qualification and i wasn't rejected from the survey. hmm.

 

[Deleted member 481]

Did they shut down the site? I'm a little confused.

They are going to turn TO1/TO2 to read only. Right now it's scheduled for December 9th, but that date might change. Eventually, the sites will be removed. That's the plan now anyways.

 

[Rogue and Ready]

Title: Product Perception | Accept Requester: MKTresearch [A3PE2WFW7YARFR] Contact TV: [Hrly=$10.38] [Pay=3.43] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=null] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.31] [Fast=4.83] [Comm=3.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=40] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=3.91] [Pen=null] [Res=0%] [Rec=33%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 0.80 Duration: 1800 Available: 1 Description: A survey about product perception, 6-10 minutes Qualifications: Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.4.0​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]
.[/td][/tr]

 

[Rogue and Ready]

Title: Food opinions and preferences (4-6 minutes) | Accept Requester: Linda Hagen [A363HPIHVFOR0M] Contact TV: [Hrly=$13.91] [Pay=4.10] [Fast=null] [Comm=null] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=4.04] [Fast=4.84] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=30] [ToS=0] TO2: [Hrly=8.49] [Pen=2.00 days] [Res=null] [Rec=100%] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 0.50 Duration: 3600 Available: 1 Description: Short, straightforward research study. You'll rate your opinion about various foods and food-related habits via multiple-choice. Total time ~5 mins. Anonymous and confidential. Thanks for participating! Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThan 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.4.0​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]
.[/td][/tr]

 

[C to the J]

If you want to have any say on TO1 & TO2 shutting down via lilly:

https://join.slack.com/t/turkingcom...EyZDhmOGRkYzk4NDA0OTAxMzJhODBhZjQ1YzkwMmFhMWI

Good night sweet prince.
May you find all your $6/hr surveys to be 5/5 pay in Valhalla .

 

[Jerami]

well this should interesting. i didn't see the age qualification and i wasn't rejected from the survey. hmm.

Isn't the 'Equal to 0' kind of an exclusion qual? Like, anyone who has a '0' value in the qualification "Age - 18 - 25 " which would mean no, is qualified? If you were between those ages, you'd have a 1, and therefore not be qualified. That's how I'm reading it and, I think, the reason why you were able to do it. I just think you're not used to seeing the format. It's usually an inclusion qual, with a "1".

tl:dr If your age is correct on your profile, 43 is not between 18-25 so, you're good.

EDIT It's hard to read this right. Sorry there's not a better way to say this, for me.

 

[TSolo315]

They are going to turn TO1/TO2 to read only. Right now it's scheduled for December 9th, but that date might change. Eventually, the sites will be removed. That's the plan now anyways.

Where was this announced?

 

[Rogue and Ready]

Title: Mood and Emotions study(~ 1 minutes) | Accept Requester: SurveyComet [A3NC2P2SPK9QQ] Contact TV: [Hrly=$21.06] [Pay=3.97] [Fast=5.00] [Comm=4.40] [Rej=0] [ToS=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=4.18] [Fast=4.71] [Comm=4.18] [Fair=4.79] [Reviews=519] [ToS=1] TO2: [Hrly=13.11] [Pen=1.67 days] [Res=50%] [Rec=88%] [Rej=4] [ToS=0] [Brk=0] Reward: 0.35 Duration: 600 Available: 1 Description: This is a short survey of mood and emotions ~ 1 min, only one question Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Exc: [110515-109926] DoesNotExist ; Location In US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.4.0​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td]
.[/td][/tr]

 

[Deleted member 481]

Where was this announced?

Lilly told me on slack a few days ago & then announced it publicly on slack this morning. Might have been six that announced it, can't remember. It was also sent to everyone on the email list.

 

[Deleted member 481]

well this should interesting. i didn't see the age qualification and i wasn't rejected from the survey. hmm.

Ah, glad I caught that. Was working on it now. Gotta send it back.

 

[Jerami]

Ah, glad I caught that. Was working on it now. Gotta send it back.

I think your good. Aren't they looking for people who aren't between 18 and 25? Like, you need a '0' not a '1'?

 

[charlie]

Isn't the 'Equal to 0' kind of an exclusion qual? Like, anyone who has a '0' value in the qualification "Age - 18 - 25 " which would mean no, is qualified? If you were between those ages, you'd have a 1, and therefore not be qualified. That's how I'm reading it and, I think, the reason why you were able to do it. I just think you're not used to seeing the format. It's usually an inclusion qual, with a "1".

tl:dr If your age is correct on your profile, 43 is not between 18-25 so, you're good.

EDIT It's hard to read this right. Sorry there's not a better way to say this, for me.

that's kinda how i feel and yeah that's my age lol. i have enough grey hair and balding on my head there's no reason to say i'm younger haha

 

[Jerami]

that's kinda how i feel and yeah that's my age lol. i have enough grey hair and balding on my head there's no reason to say i'm younger haha

I don't think we're going on a gut feeling here. I think the fact that you were allowed to accept and submit it proves my comprehension of the qual. You're good. If anything, the requester did it wrong.

 

[Jerami]

that's kinda how i feel and yeah that's my age lol. i have enough grey hair and balding on my head there's no reason to say i'm younger haha

You only have months on me. I don't hide it. What good would that do?

 

[Jaded]

I think I just saw an attention check, read it, understood it, and then marked the complete opposite of what it asked.

 

[charlie]

You only have months on me. I don't hide it. What good would that do?

lol so true.

 

[SquishyFluffkin]

I think I just saw an attention check, read it, understood it, and then marked the complete opposite of what it asked.

Wouldn't expect any less. Keep up the good work.

 

[cb456]

well this should interesting. i didn't see the age qualification and i wasn't rejected from the survey. hmm.

they want 26 and older based on that qual

 

[esprit-hyperdoux]

Isn't the 'Equal to 0' kind of an exclusion qual? Like, anyone who has a '0' value in the qualification "Age - 18 - 25 " which would mean no, is qualified? If you were between those ages, you'd have a 1, and therefore not be qualified. That's how I'm reading it and, I think, the reason why you were able to do it. I just think you're not used to seeing the format. It's usually an inclusion qual, with a "1".

tl:dr If your age is correct on your profile, 43 is not between 18-25 so, you're good.

EDIT It's hard to read this right. Sorry there's not a better way to say this, for me.

i just took a look on requester side and for that qual you have to choose either True or False, which would presumably show up as "equal to 1" and "equal to 0" respectively

 

[Deleted member 481]

they want 26 and older based on that qual

Ah, so I returned it for nothing, doh! The questions were long af though.