05/22 - Warburton Wednesday!

[aveline]

Title: Human Robot Interaction Survey | Accept Requester: HRI Lab [A30SYF6C09S8YL] Contact TV: [Hrly=$[color=Steelblue]14.97[/color]] [Pay=[color=Mediumslateblue]Good[/color]] [Approval=[color=Steelblue]~24 hrs[/color]] [Comm=[color=Steelblue]Excellent[/color]] [Rej=[color=Steelblue]0[/color]] [Blk=[color=Steelblue]0[/color]] TO: [Pay=[color=Steelblue]4.16[/color]] [Fast=[color=Steelblue]4.83[/color]] [Comm=[color=Steelblue]4.50[/color]] [Fair=[color=Steelblue]5.00[/color]] [Reviews=42] [ToS=[color=Steelblue]0[/color]] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 1.00 Duration: 30:00 Available: 1 Description: Answer questions after watching a short video of a daily life scenario. Workers who participated in a previous version of this experiment in 2017 or 2018 will not be able to participate and will be given an error message. Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 500; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.6.11​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[Knight]

Requesters as a whole, should reject more often than they do, then there would be less people scamming HITs = better reputation for mturk = more work = more $_$

why would you say something so controversial yet so brave?
(and true)

 

[Kristina M Greer]

It also doesn't help that they just don't give proper instructions. They give examples of what they want and then it's super simple to see that "oh, this isn't too tough." and then you start doing the task and there's stuff that is very nebulous and you're not sure if they want it done that way.

i guess it's just like real math. spend time studying and get to the test and it's nothing like the practice

Thats my prob, no real instructions.. And sad part is math is my thing.. I was excited to be boxing math problems based on limits LOL
Just please leave a review on TV and let them know how the directions were lacking. Would love them to post again if they can make the intructions more informatable

 

[aveline]

Title: Shopping Study | Accept Requester: Tina [A1K09FP8Y5ML05] Contact TV: [Hrly=$[color=Steelblue]12.82[/color]] [Pay=[color=Mediumslateblue]Good[/color]] [Approval=[color=Steelblue]~24 hrs[/color]] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=[color=Steelblue]0[/color]] [Blk=[color=Steelblue]0[/color]] TO: [Pay=[color=Mediumpurple]2.42[/color]] [Fast=[color=Steelblue]4.66[/color]] [Comm=[color=Steelblue]4.00[/color]] [Fair=[color=Steelblue]4.72[/color]] [Reviews=89] [ToS=[color=Mediumorchid]1[/color]] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.75 Duration: 5:00:00 Available: 1 Description: 5-minute or less survey on life and consumer experiences! Please provide answers in a short survey. Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location EqualTo US [tr][td] HIT exported from Mturk Suite v2.6.11​

[/td][/tr]

[tr][td][/td][/tr]

 

[corysilk]

So Peachy lost his masters because of 44 mass rejections...I'm a bit concerned lol.

my approval rating is 99.8% but still had my masters revoked

i did get "mass" rejected w 48 hits last week though

 

[thismegan]

If everyone is getting some rejections, I wouldn't worry about losing masters over it.

If everyone else was jumping off a bridge, would you get masters too?

 

[Bolbor]

Requesters, as a whole, should reject more often than they do, then there would be less people scamming HITs = better reputation for mturk = more work = more $_$

no problem with this line of thought as long as requesters also realize they need to be very thorough with their instructions and open to communication while their stuff is being worked on

 

[redtokyoboxers]

Final tally is 4 rejections. I finally broke past the 100 rejection barrier, which I hear is when the hits really open up.

 

[TSolo315]

Requesters as a whole, should reject more often than they do, then there would be less people scamming HITs = better reputation for mturk = more work = more $_$

"BUT THIS SINGLE REJECTION IMPACTS MY ABILITY TO WORK ON HITS! YOU PRETTY MUCH CONDEMNED ME TO STARVATION!"

why would you say something so controversial yet so brave?
(and true)

A symptom of working on Mturk too long and getting exposed to several HITs that have you review other turkers work. Your sympathy for requesters steadily increases.

Until you get another "Sorry. I made a mistake and am reposting the survey take it again please" rejection.

 

[kryss]

no problem with this line of thought as long as requesters also realize they need to be very thorough with their instructions and open to communication while their stuff is being worked on

I do agree.

I also believe we should give them a reasonable amount of time to respond, and sort out a situation before bringing out the pitchforks.

 

[cb456]

Final tally is 4 rejections. I finally broke past the 100 rejection barrier, which I hear is when the hits really open up.

thats when the blocks start rollin in. $$

 

[Bolbor]

I just had a thought actually. What did you guys do for the math hits where there was an open bracket with several formulas afterward?

 

[IdahoCrab]

If everyone else was jumping off a bridge, would you get masters too?

I mean... if that's all it takes, where is this bridge? Asking for a friend...

 

[Jerami]

MeasuringU qualifier for Prolific
https://app.prolific.ac/studies/5ce5a0c0337015001739a22e
2minutes

 

[turkleton]

"BUT THIS SINGLE REJECTION IMPACTS MY ABILITY TO WORK ON HITS! YOU PRETTY MUCH CONDEMNED ME TO STARVATION!"



A symptom of working on Mturk too long and getting exposed to several HITs that have you review other turkers work. Your sympathy for requesters steadily increases.

Until you get another "Sorry. I made a mistake and am reposting the survey take it again please" rejection.

I have no sympathy for anyone. Requesters and turkers are all bad.

 

[cb456]

somebody is working on my windows and I don't feel like doing this ustertest while they are here.

 

[Jerami]

I do agree.

I also believe we should give them a reasonable amount of time to respond, and sort out a situation before bringing out the pitchforks.

+1 on all counts! Totally agree!

And, to add to that, understand that after giving them that adequate time to respond, instructions are ever-evolving, growing, going more in-depth, increasing the amount and quality of examples and discovering/adding tips for edge cases. FAQs can't be a thing, by definition, until they've been frequently asked. It's in the name.

 

[Jerami]

somebody is working on my windows and I don't feel like doing this ustertest while they are here.

Install Linux on a dual-boot. Then, next time someone is working on your windows, you can use linux.

 

[Peachy]

Peachy Bomb

Title: Product Perception Study (<3-5minutes)(~ 5 minutes) | Accept Requester: Lea Dunn [A24SP9LPC7ENRG] Contact TV: [Hrly=$15.44] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.60] [Fast=4.58] [Comm=4.07] [Fair=4.70] [Reviews=128] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.50 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 0 Description: You will be asked to answer questions about a particular product category. This will take about 3 minutes to complete. Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

1:08

Title: Thinking retrospectively about movies and TV shows | Accept Requester: Neha Sethi [AE2VK2N8H8PHS] Contact TV: [Hrly=$13.36] [Pay=Good] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 2.50 Duration: 2:00:00 Available: 0 Description: This online research aims to understand and examine people how and why people think retrospectively about a television show or movie after they watch it and how that affects their enjoyment and appreciation of the story. Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

4:21

Title: Social Perception(~ 2 minutes) | Accept Requester: Stanford GSB Behavioral Lab [A3OSXTUM1QEXNY] Contact TV: [Hrly=$14.28] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Poor] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.24] [Fast=4.12] [Comm=3.43] [Fair=4.35] [Reviews=632] [ToS=7] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.24 Duration: 30:00 Available: 0 Description: Earn $.24 for a 2 min study! This is a short paid study on social perception. Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

50s

Title: Evaluate some products for us. | Accept Requester: Mousavi, Seyedjavad [ASKEJU201UFQZ] Contact TV: [Hrly=$10.87] [Pay=Fair] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=1.00] [Fast=0.00] [Comm=0.00] [Fair=0.00] [Reviews=1] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.50 Duration: 30:00 Available: 0 Description: Evaluate some products for us. Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.

1:50

 

[cb456]

Install Linux on a dual-boot. Then, next time someone is working on your windows, you can use linux.

yeah but then I have to partition it, and decide if I want default bootloader or lilo and then I have to pick a distro and then a gui. or I could just go with ubuntu or whatever.

oh wait.