07/30 - Toasty Tuesday!

[turkinthailand]

Logged HITs is just a log of everything that has posted. The times are the last times that those HITs showed up on the search page.

Thomas Furmstrom HIT just came up, it's on my Include List in Hit Finder, yet didn't show up until 12.33 am, which is 15 minutes after the job started, right at the end of it actually, so pretty useless. I have "Search Speed" set to 3500 ms in HIT Finder, and I set the page size to "100"

It showed up in Hit Forker immediately, even though the "Search Delay" is set to 10 seconds. What gives? And these are big batch HITs, so it's not like they can disappear in a second.

It's stupid running both HIT Finder and HIT Forker but neither seems to work reliably on their own. Just trying to find something that works reliably, sigh.

Any obvious reason why HITs I am qualified for don't appear reliably in HIT Finder? Anyone else have reliability issues with this kind of thing.

Thxs u so much

 

[rjd66]

Title: Robot Occupation and Task Survey | Accept Requester: Georgia Tech Research Team [A2A9HYBC6V4HX5] Contact TV: [Hrly=$39.11] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: No Reviews TO2: No Reviews Reward: 2.00 Duration: 20:00 Available: 1 Description: This study seeks to determine your perceptions on whether humanoid robots can perform different occupations or tasks. Qualifications: Masters Exists ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location EqualTo US edit: 7.5 min to complete

 

[HelloHello]

Title: 10 minute communication study for people with coworkers in your location and another location $1.20(~ 1 minutes) | Accept Requester: Research Lab [AFHV1ISCCWY5R] Contact TV: [Hrly=$12.74] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.66] [Fast=4.96] [Comm=4.43] [Fair=4.85] [Reviews=39] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 1.20 Duration: 30:00 Available: 52 Description: 10 minute communication study for people with coworkers in your location and another location $1.20 Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; Exc: [47222269-161758] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location In US

7 minutes

 

[jan]

Title: Scenario Study(~ 5 minutes) | Accept Requester: josh.wiener@okstate.edu [A2ZTECTX04M1LY] Contact TV: [Hrly=$13.01] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.20] [Fast=4.57] [Comm=1.00] [Fair=5.00] [Reviews=21] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.60 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 27 Description: Brief study involving reading a scenario and answering questions about it Qualifications: Exc: [158408672-161763] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location In US

 

[jan]

It looks like there were a lot of people where that was heading. I hope no one was under it when it landed.

at least the system was empty...........

 

[mboone73]

It looks like there were a lot of people where that was heading. I hope no one was under it when it landed.

That’s a literal shit storm.

 

[DatJersey]

Title: Quick Survey answering questions about hypothetical scenario(~ 8 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Lauren Grewal [A13UHL5YRQS01R] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 4.20 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.84 Generosity ★★★★★ 4.87 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.87 Promptness Number of Reviews: 53 | TOS Flags: 7 Submit a new TO review Description: Quick Survey answering questions about hypothetical scenario. Writing and Scales. Must be 18 or older. $.80. Ave 8 min. Time: 5400 HITs Available: 4 Reward: $0.80 Qualifications: Total approved HITs LessThanOrEqualTo 100000;Location In US 4 min. screener. writing

 

[DatJersey]

Title: Real Estate Negotiation(~ 15 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Alex Van Zant [A3VDQ7V0QCT9PM] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 5.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.17 Generosity ★★★★★ 4.86 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.59 Promptness Number of Reviews: 64 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: $2.00 for a 10-minute negotiation. Most workers will also receive a bonus payment depending on performance. Time: 3600 HITs Available: 1 Reward: $2.00 Qualifications: 323ce9b1 DoesNotExist ;Exc: [160337286-161743] DoesNotExist ;HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95;Location In US

10 min. there is a bonus possible but my partner dipped on me. requester responded immediately to my question of what to do. Finish and get paid. the negotiation prob would have taken less time then my waiting.

 

[ccmet121]

Think I'm officially done with 5's. This lag rages me. lol

 

[cyberwasp]

Alexandria, we used to be friends, what happened to you.

 

[rjd66]

Title: Intergroup Dynamics Study STU00207794 (7/30/2019 Batch #1)(~ 60 minutes) | Accept Requester: Kellogg Kteily Lab [A8VNY3KPRHHRC] Contact TV: [Hrly=$13.40] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Excellent] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.30] [Fast=4.94] [Comm=4.81] [Fair=4.97] [Reviews=102] [ToS=1] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 6.00 Duration: 1:30:00 Available: 11 Description: Interactive group role playing study with other participants. This study cannot be clicked through and must be completed right away. Qualifications: SurveyGroup [2474] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 500; Exc: [2109752087-161762] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 97; Location In US Edit: interesting and 40 min to complete

 

[aveline]

Thomas Furmstrom HIT just came up, it's on my Include List in Hit Finder, yet didn't show up until 12.33 am, which is 15 minutes after the job started, right at the end of it actually, so pretty useless. I have "Search Speed" set to 3500 ms in HIT Finder, and I set the page size to "100"

It showed up in Hit Forker immediately, even though the "Search Delay" is set to 10 seconds. What gives? And these are big batch HITs, so it's not like they can disappear in a second.

It's stupid running both HIT Finder and HIT Forker but neither seems to work reliably on their own. Just trying to find something that works reliably, sigh.

Any obvious reason why HITs I am qualified for don't appear reliably in HIT Finder? Anyone else have reliability issues with this kind of thing.

Thxs u so much

I'm not sure, but I've never had any issues with HIT Finder. HIT Forker is just a fork of HIT Finder, so there's really not a lot of difference between how the two work. I have my page size set to 25 in HIT Finder with HITs I'm qualled for checked, and a 3000ms refresh. Furmstons popped right up for me. Could you be getting PREs, maybe? I'm not really sure why you would be having that problem with it.

 

[K'Lee]

I have not been around for a while. Just a ton of stuff going on. Have I missed anything spectacular?

 

[MarkC]

I have not been around for a while. Just a ton of stuff going on. Have I missed anything spectacular?

Oh heck no

 

[aveline]

I have not been around for a while. Just a ton of stuff going on. Have I missed anything spectacular?

Welcome back!

 

[Kennedy]

Afternoon everyone!

 

[K'Lee]

Welcome back!

Thanks. I've missed everyone. Just that "life" thing is taking up a ton of my time. Hopefully I can get back in to the swing of things. So far today though I have had better luck with Prolific.

 

[aveline]

Thanks. I've missed everyone. Just that "life" thing is taking up a ton of my time. Hopefully I can get back in to the swing of things. So far today though I have had better luck with Prolific.

It has been a rough summer around here, for sure.

 

[K'Lee]

It has been a rough summer around here, for sure.

Well it's good to see some familiar faces are still here.

 

[largeeyes]

Qualifikationstest für Sentimentannotation von Tweets über Bundestagsabgeordnete (~3 min., $0.80) is not less than 1200000000

That.....is a high score.