11/14 - Thoroughbred Thursday

Did you get a Amazon bot warning email?


  • Total voters
    111
Status
Not open for further replies.

afallstarxfall

Well-Known Member
Spoonfeeder
Social Butterfly
Very Versatile
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
8,755
Reaction score
4,350
Points
563
Location
California
Gender
Female
Title: Jury Duty - The Kind You Get Paid For (COO-TOY-W)(~ 60 minutes) | Accept
Requester: Empirical Jury [A2QGI2L47S8HB0] Contact
TV: [Hrly=$11.22] [Pay=Good] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Poor] [Rej=1] [Blk=0]
TO: [Pay=2.99] [Fast=3.11] [Comm=2.06] [Fair=2.99] [Reviews=107] [ToS=3]
TO2: No Reviews
Reward: 8.00
Duration: 3:00:00
Available: 47
Description: You will read a presentation and return a verdict. You will also answer questions about yourself and the script.
Qualifications: Exc: [501147046-182041] DoesNotExist ; SurveyGroup [3076] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 90; Location In US
 
  • Like
Reactions: JanetW

Blakkat

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
20,285
Reaction score
12,525
Points
1,238
Location
Florida
Gender
Female
Title: Individual Perceptions XXI(~ 15 minutes) | Accept
Requester: SIBL Lab [A1JTEOSQ0M2HTO] Contact
TV: [Hrly=$13.66] [Pay=Good] [Approval=~24 hrs] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0]
TO: [Pay=2.28] [Fast=4.30] [Comm=2.78] [Fair=3.83] [Reviews=48] [ToS=0]
TO2: No Reviews
Reward: 2.00
Duration: 30:00
Available: 0
Description: Participate in an interesting study where we will ask you rate particular names. You must be 18 or older and a legal adult in your state of residence to participate in this study.
Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.
 
  • Like
Reactions: savvy

Finn Mertens

| (• ◡•)| (❍ᴥ❍ʋ)
Joined
Oct 31, 2019
Messages
554
Reaction score
1,386
Points
393
Location
Earldom of Lemongrab

chrisd6

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2019
Messages
399
Reaction score
852
Points
143
Location
Bama
Gender
Male
well, ya'll are making me scared to withdraw my $450... maybe I'll just keep it and let it pile up till they do their automatic withdrawal thing....
 

chrisd6

Member
Joined
Nov 5, 2019
Messages
399
Reaction score
852
Points
143
Location
Bama
Gender
Male

Blakkat

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Joined
May 7, 2018
Messages
20,285
Reaction score
12,525
Points
1,238
Location
Florida
Gender
Female
Title: Test a fun new social network site - up to $10 payment with bonus! | Accept
Requester: Cornell Social Media [A37XI48SFRYD3Y] Contact
TV: [Hrly=$18.56] [Pay=Fair] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0]
TO: [Pay=3.45] [Fast=3.96] [Comm=2.80] [Fair=4.00] [Reviews=32] [ToS=0]
TO2: No Reviews
Reward: 0.50
Duration: 1:00:00
Available: 1
Description: We want to investigate how communities form and are sustained on social media sites. Use the site for 2 days and earn up to $10!
Qualifications: Not available from queue exports.
 

XWarrior

Active Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2019
Messages
567
Reaction score
1,368
Points
343
Gender
Female
I've said this elsewhere, and just to be clear I don't have any sort of contacts at Amazon or anything it's just my personal observations and I'm not taking sides/judging/whatever, but I think these emails are a lot more high level than just any X/Y batch. MTurk has everyone's entire work history from day one, it's not like they cannot look into things with some fairly simple queries and pull accounts with X # blocks / % above avg submission on Z batch / etc to start identifying accounts that might be sources of data quality that might be undesirable to requesters. People have a really hard time disassociating their work effort with their work product and we all know on MTurk we don't really get paid for effort.

From what little we get to see they've divulged reaching out for datasets specifically looking for low quality work & the VPN'd up accounts. This one was posted this week:



So even being cheeky and thinking putting "VERY NICE" into the comment box on a survey is funny (something I've seen more than a few workers mention doing) might come back to bite you 6 months later. Could be anything similar from work history. There is a requester resource that specifically looks for some stupid things & associates a quality scored based on it & no one will know if/when the dataset is shared w/ MTurk and/or how they process it (if at all).

Maybe some emails are errors, maybe not, but it's a good opportunity to remember that a lot of things that are just a byproduct of being a human worker can be really damning when tossed into an algorithm that sorts us all based on input we don't get a say in.
Yes agree, and this is like one of those blizzard clean ups and clear outs, prior to the move to the payment structure being implemented. I think also those two large groups of requesters as well the "merge to report" ones have given more insight to the decision makers. I hope any innocents get things cleared up quick enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChrisTurk

JenniLeigh

Batch Betta Have My Money
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
23,084
Reaction score
46,895
Points
1,388
Location
my napping spot
Gender
Female
Ah, okay so time to withdraw ASAP before a new issue comes about.. got it LOL
lmao maybe
Mine WERE after Sunday though.

(I think all the issues were from this weekend?)

(I've withdrawn four times this week... in case that matters lol)
 
Last edited:

cb456

Let's do some hits!
Mentor
Contributor
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
5,983
Reaction score
15,962
Points
1,013
Gender
Male
I've said this elsewhere, and just to be clear I don't have any sort of contacts at Amazon or anything it's just my personal observations and I'm not taking sides/judging/whatever, but I think these emails are a lot more high level than just any X/Y batch. MTurk has everyone's entire work history from day one, it's not like they cannot look into things with some fairly simple queries and pull accounts with X # blocks / % above avg submission on Z batch / etc to start identifying accounts that might be sources of data quality that might be undesirable to requesters. People have a really hard time disassociating their work effort with their work product and we all know on MTurk we don't really get paid for effort.

From what little we get to see they've divulged reaching out for datasets specifically looking for low quality work & the VPN'd up accounts. This one was posted this week:



So even being cheeky and thinking putting "VERY NICE" into the comment box on a survey is funny (something I've seen more than a few workers mention doing) might come back to bite you 6 months later. Could be anything similar from work history. There is a requester resource that specifically looks for some stupid things & associates a quality scored based on it & no one will know if/when the dataset is shared w/ MTurk and/or how they process it (if at all).

Maybe some emails are errors, maybe not, but it's a good opportunity to remember that a lot of things that are just a byproduct of being a human worker can be really damning when tossed into an algorithm that sorts us all based on input we don't get a say in.
it would be nice if mturk used an actual human to judge if we are doing human intelligence tasks
just my 2 cents
 

PandaThief

Well-Known Member
Joined
Jul 9, 2018
Messages
5,035
Reaction score
15,583
Points
938
Age
45
Gender
Male
Does he ?


Title: Elmo loves gumballs | PANDA
Requester: Stanford Language and Cognition Lab [A1XUBU5CS5SFRV] (Req TV): $16.40/hr/hr
(TO): [Pay: N/A] [Fair: N/A] [Comm: N/A] [Fast: N/A]
Description:
Children's game involving Elmo -- adult participants wanted for testing purposes
Time: 15 minutes(s)
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $0.85
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 95; Completed Elmo game already DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThan 50; Location EqualTo US;
 

keljenner

Member
Joined
Dec 29, 2017
Messages
237
Reaction score
301
Points
263
Gender
Male
My "pending" withdrawal is only $110 but I am royally screwed now. That was gas money for the week so I can get to my job. This is making me rethink this whole TURKing, I have only doing this since early June and between the August debacle and now this I may just give it up. The extra money is nice, but a huge company like Amazon doing business like this astounds me.
99 percent of the time the payments are fine. I've had two issues in three years with payments and one of them resulted in me gaining 200 dollars cause of their mistake. Turk and Payments are separate entities. Turk has never been late in getting the money to Payments for me, so it's Payments at fault here and they are going away in 2 months, so you shouldn't leave. Turk's issues are they suspend people for no reason and always want you to live in fear that you may be next.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.