- Joined
- Jan 13, 2016
- Messages
- 4,375
- Reaction score
- 3,247
- Points
- 738
- Gender
- Female
I keep kosher or at least now I do... bacon lube hard passWhy don't you want bacon lube? It seems pretty good.
Title: Writing Style and Attitudes(~ 40 minutes) | PANDA Requester: UCSB EMBeR Lab [AF6BFJHZGXXPL] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.00 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 7 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Complete a short writing task and several questionnaires as part of a research study. Time: 6 hours HITs Available: 18 Reward: $4.00 Qualifications: Exc: [386298-11818] has not been granted;Total approved HITs is not less than 50;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90;Location is one of: US |
I've never understood why the word Moist bothers so many people.....I get it now.
I've never understood why the word Moist bothers so many people.....I get it now.
moistI've never understood why the word Moist bothers so many people.....I get it now.
A Moist Crevice for Word Aversion: In Semantics Not SoundsI've never understood why the word Moist bothers so many people.....I get it now.
ewwmoist
"have a good performance rating (>90% approval rating)"A Moist Crevice for Word Aversion: In Semantics Not Sounds
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153686
Why do people self-report an aversion to words like “moist”? The present studies represent an initial scientific exploration into the phenomenon of word aversion by investigating its prevalence and cause. Results of five experiments indicate that about 10–20% of the population is averse to the word “moist.” This population often speculates that phonological properties of the word are the cause of their displeasure. However, data from the current studies point to semantic features of the word–namely, associations with disgusting bodily functions–as a more prominent source of peoples’ unpleasant experience. “Moist,” for averse participants, was notable for its valence and personal use, rather than imagery or arousal–a finding that was confirmed by an experiment designed to induce an aversion to the word. Analyses of individual difference measures suggest that word aversion is more prevalent among younger, more educated, and more neurotic people, and is more commonly reported by females than males. Participants in all five experiments were recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk using the same inclusion criteria: participants had to be at least 18 years of age, live in the US, and have a good performance rating (>90% approval rating).
... Approved 100%"have a good performance rating (>90% approval rating)"
This is the key to masters.
This is really quite interesting, but I'd like to know what results are among people who aren't mentally unstable and working for pennies.A Moist Crevice for Word Aversion: In Semantics Not Sounds
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0153686
Why do people self-report an aversion to words like “moist”? The present studies represent an initial scientific exploration into the phenomenon of word aversion by investigating its prevalence and cause. Results of five experiments indicate that about 10–20% of the population is averse to the word “moist.” This population often speculates that phonological properties of the word are the cause of their displeasure. However, data from the current studies point to semantic features of the word–namely, associations with disgusting bodily functions–as a more prominent source of peoples’ unpleasant experience. “Moist,” for averse participants, was notable for its valence and personal use, rather than imagery or arousal–a finding that was confirmed by an experiment designed to induce an aversion to the word. Analyses of individual difference measures suggest that word aversion is more prevalent among younger, more educated, and more neurotic people, and is more commonly reported by females than males. Participants in all five experiments were recruited through Amazon’s Mechanical Turk using the same inclusion criteria: participants had to be at least 18 years of age, live in the US, and have a good performance rating (>90% approval rating).
... Approved 100%
... Rejected 0 0%
Title: Judgment and Decision-Making Study(~ 7 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Social Science Research [A1E92NJMLW1NK8] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 3.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.84 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 29 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Participants will be asked to engage in judgment and decision-making tasks. Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.75 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100;Exc: [11702763-11826] has not been granted;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Location is one of: US |
Title: Harvard Writing Study | PANDA Requester: Erik Nook [A3S1K0MCPS0JE1] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.75 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.00 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.40 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.80 Promptness Number of Reviews: 9 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Complete questionnaires and a task on writing about emotional images! Time: 2 hours Hits Available: 3 Reward: $3.50 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US |
I still have this HIT ready to go on my requester account.... Approved 100%
... Rejected 0 0%
They love the word. But, every now and then, the pretend like they hate it. They think it helps them to understand the plight of the other 98%.This is really quite interesting, but I'd like to know what results are among people who aren't mentally unstable and working for pennies.