07/20 - World According to Garp Wednesday!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Definitely Not Riss

Probably not Breakfast Wino
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
3,967
Reaction score
7,418
Points
938
Gender
Female
Response from the requester. One stupid scammer ruins it for the rest, eh?
"The problem is that some workers are committing fraud. One worker did over 400 HITs yesterday and used a "random name generator" to enter false data. Of course, I rejected all that work. What do I do if a worker enters names for 20% of the entries but the data show they spent 5 seconds on each one? My solution has been to find workers who are doing sloppy/fraudulent work and reject all their work. But I hear your feedback and I will see what I can do to try to deal with different cases differently. But it's hard to do that in a big project."
This is why we work from queue people. I mean if you do a hit in 5 seconds and scam it. I can script it in 5 seconds and all my work is correct we both don't deserve rejections.
 
Last edited:

WordVixen

I Don't Know What I'm Doing
Contributor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
368
Reaction score
683
Points
368
Gender
Female
Response from the requester. One stupid scammer ruins it for the rest, eh?
"The problem is that some workers are committing fraud. One worker did over 400 HITs yesterday and used a "random name generator" to enter false data. Of course, I rejected all that work. What do I do if a worker enters names for 20% of the entries but the data show they spent 5 seconds on each one? My solution has been to find workers who are doing sloppy/fraudulent work and reject all their work. But I hear your feedback and I will see what I can do to try to deal with different cases differently. But it's hard to do that in a big project."
It may be hard, but it's unethical to do otherwise. But... it sounds like he's reconsidering?
 

freedolphin

Active Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2016
Messages
526
Reaction score
733
Points
93
Age
37
"I hear you. I'm going to review this tomorrow and see if I can reverse some of the ones I rejected. I will get back in touch.

Sent from my iPhone"


THANK GOD
 

RaffRiffofTurk

The Lord of Darkness Until 8 AM
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
3,127
Points
638
Age
37
Location
Panhandle of Florida
Gender
Male
Title: A short three to five minute survey on your opinions and attitudes | PANDA
Requester: miranda [A2R9NI0XZLQDKY] (TO)
TO Ratings:
★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity
★★★★★ 3.00 Generosity
★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness
★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness
Number of Reviews: 10 | TOS Flags: 0
Submit a new TO review
Description: Give us your opinion in certain scenarios
Time: 60 minutes
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $0.30
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 85;Location is US
3:46.
 

Metallica

Never free, never me
Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
5,319
Reaction score
14,228
Points
1,113
Age
33
Gender
Male
This is why we work from queue people. I mean if you do a hit in 5 seconds and scam it. I can script it in 5 seconds and all my work is correct we both don't deserve rejections.
Scripting doesn't seem to be the issue.. or speed for that matter. Whoever [mod edit] decided to use a name generator should have known this would happen.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

RaffRiffofTurk

The Lord of Darkness Until 8 AM
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
3,127
Points
638
Age
37
Location
Panhandle of Florida
Gender
Male
Even if he does reconsider don't be surprised if you don't see any more work from him.
Plus his TO is effectively wrecked now, which will discourage people from working for him. That name generator fraud dude really screwed over a lot of people.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghost Awakening

humbleturker

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
10,554
Reaction score
23,278
Points
1,738
Age
33
Gender
Male
Response from the requester. One stupid scammer ruins it for the rest, eh?
"The problem is that some workers are committing fraud. One worker did over 400 HITs yesterday and used a "random name generator" to enter false data. Of course, I rejected all that work. What do I do if a worker enters names for 20% of the entries but the data show they spent 5 seconds on each one? My solution has been to find workers who are doing sloppy/fraudulent work and reject all their work. But I hear your feedback and I will see what I can do to try to deal with different cases differently. But it's hard to do that in a big project."

Sounds like he wasn't prepared for this at all. Yeah, I posted 40-50% of the HITs as no pastor for church or couldn't find the church listed, but that was after at least 30-40 seconds of deliberation. I wasn't careless at all with any of them.
 

Woofles

Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2016
Messages
106
Reaction score
164
Points
243
Age
30
Gender
Female
i used to have that lofty $5/day goal. it became $25/day within two weeks and now i aim for $30/day bare minimum. anything about $50 and i'm basically a happy camper.
I used to do this full-time. Now I'm a 8-5'er! Mturk was used strictly for play. Now it's kinda coming back to being needed so I'm not dipping into my paychecks for a new computer that's not really necessary. Totally doable though, that's why I'm taking it on! :smilingimp:
 

Definitely Not Riss

Probably not Breakfast Wino
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
3,967
Reaction score
7,418
Points
938
Gender
Female
Scripting doesn't seem to be the issue.. or speed for that matter. Whoever [mod edit] decided to use a name generator should have known this would happen.
I dunno if thats a thing. It sounds to me like someone wrote a shitty GET script
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: Metallica

Metallica

Never free, never me
Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
5,319
Reaction score
14,228
Points
1,113
Age
33
Gender
Male
Scripting doesn't seem to be the issue.. or speed for that matter. Whoever [mod edit] decided to use a name generator should have known this would happen.
Actually, I'll take that back. Everyone remembers when Jobaline rejected everyone because they didn't know workers could queue hits.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

WordVixen

I Don't Know What I'm Doing
Contributor
Joined
Mar 24, 2016
Messages
368
Reaction score
683
Points
368
Gender
Female
Even if he does reconsider don't be surprised if you don't see any more work from him.
I don't think I'd be willing to do any more work for him no matter what, unless he shows that he's taking it seriously by, like, setting up a qual or something.
 

RaffRiffofTurk

The Lord of Darkness Until 8 AM
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
2,024
Reaction score
3,127
Points
638
Age
37
Location
Panhandle of Florida
Gender
Male
Actually, I'll take that back. Everyone remembers when Jobaline rejected everyone because they didn't know workers could queue hits.
I had a woman at the wound care clinic my mom goes to ask me how the people who make Pokemon GO are able to get the Pokemon in the middle of lakes or inside of buildings when they haven't personally been there. How little some people know about technology is FRIGHTENING.
 

Metallica

Never free, never me
Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2016
Messages
5,319
Reaction score
14,228
Points
1,113
Age
33
Gender
Male
I had a woman at the wound care clinic my mom goes to ask me how the people who make Pokemon GO are able to get the Pokemon in the middle of lakes or inside of buildings when they haven't personally been there. How little some people know about technology is FRIGHTENING.
 

humbleturker

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Jul 8, 2016
Messages
10,554
Reaction score
23,278
Points
1,738
Age
33
Gender
Male
This is why we work from queue people. I mean if you do a hit in 5 seconds and scam it. I can script it in 5 seconds and all my work is correct we both don't deserve rejections.
Yep. I work from queue all the time now.

"I hear you. I'm going to review this tomorrow and see if I can reverse some of the ones I rejected. I will get back in touch.

Sent from my iPhone"


THANK GOD
Hopefully he does. I'll never work for him again but I'll review his review tomorrow and see what I think then
 
  • Like
Reactions: WordVixen
Status
Not open for further replies.