07/23 - Scarlett O'Hara Saturday!

[Jesicu]

I did round 1 last night but haven't gotten an invitation to do round 2 yet.

I also did the Implicit values V2 and they keep changing my score from a 90 to an 80 and back to a 90 and now back to an 80

I'm almost certain the qual to get into round 2 was immediate. I would try shooting them a message. And my implicit changed at least 5 times.

 

[freedolphin]

I'm doing content research and bluejay labs here and there but there's not much else up.

how do I get the content research qual

 

[Red Leaf Falls]

good morning!

We had... a no T.O. requester with a 12K batch of 10c (that was a fat batch - requester called baseline). Next there was a HIT by NPI research, $2.50, nab it if you can, $7.50 + bonus (panda back a few pages).

I like your nick, it's poetic.

Thank you, I saw some of that batch before I went to bed but didn't try any. I'll try to grab some later.
And also thank you. It is kind of my own personal "cellar door" phrase that brings me calm.

 

[Azazael]

Title: Answer multiple choice questions (approx. 60-90 minutes, breaks permitted) | PANDA Requester: Human Language Technology Center of Excellence [A3TIPSVD4A2IXU] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 2.10 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.65 Generosity ★★★★★ 3.63 Fairness ★★★★★ 3.27 Promptness Number of Reviews: 17 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Answer multiple choice questions Time: 12 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $13.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100;Piloting_R has not been granted;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90;Location is US

this was well worth it when i snagged it last night, i wanna say it took me about 60m super distracted. not very difficult, panda the shit outta this hit if you can

 

[Red Leaf Falls]

I'm almost certain the qual to get into round 2 was immediate. I would try shooting them a message. And my implicit changed at least 5 times.

Thank you, I'll do that. I got the round 1 at 90, even though I think I got 4 wrong. But I'm hopeful they'll let me continue to try.

 

[Matilda Jones]

how do I get the content research qual

They post the qual hits every couple of weeks. I just got it a few weeks ago and I know they've posted it again since then.

 

[TQueen]

Title: Answer a survey about your opinions | PANDA Requester: yael ecker [A3GIP8CFCHMV43] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 2.73 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.32 Generosity ★★★★★ 4.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 31 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Give us your opinion about various campaigns of non-profitable organizations. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100;HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 90;Location is US

 

[Christa]

I'm chasing pennies here - and trying to ignore my cat, who is at the doorwall with something dead hanging out of his mouth that he would like to give me for lunch <gag> ---- I'm going to take a shower and do some housework. Have a good day y'all.

 

[jnalleyne]

Title: Answer multiple choice questions (approx. 60-90 minutes, breaks permitted) | PANDA Requester: Human Language Technology Center of Excellence [A3TIPSVD4A2IXU] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 2.10 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.65 Generosity ★★★★★ 3.63 Fairness ★★★★★ 3.27 Promptness Number of Reviews: 17 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Answer multiple choice questions Time: 12 hours HITs Available: 1 Reward: $13.00 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100;Piloting_R has not been granted;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90;Location is US

How often do they post?

 

[Tuesday]

good morning!

We had... a no T.O. requester with a 12K batch of 10c (that was a fat batch - requester called baseline). Next there was a HIT by NPI research, $2.50, nab it if you can, $7.50 + bonus (panda back a few pages).

I like your nick, it's poetic.

Baseline sent me an email and said they would post in new batch in a couple of hours.

 

[Azazael]

How often do they post?

Today is the....4th day i have seen that hit, i think, maybe 3....but it has been bounced around all this week

 

[squee]

Title: Participate in an academic study | PANDA Requester: Jirs Meuris [AVAWVBZ41O00R] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 1.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.69 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 15 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Requires you to answer some questions about and scenario and yourself Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.80 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is greater than 500;HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 98;Location is US

 

[corvid]

Since it's a slow Saturday and we're all fans of the panda, did everyone see this video of Bei Bei trying to get down a tree? It's really cute.

 

[SquishyFluffkin]

Title: Participate in an academic study | PANDA Requester: Jirs Meuris [AVAWVBZ41O00R] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 1.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.69 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 15 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Requires you to answer some questions about and scenario and yourself Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.80 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is greater than 500;HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 98;Location is US

3 minutes

 

[corvid]

Title: Decision Survey ($1 for 5-10 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Oleg Urminsky [A2UT64NH2GJ8XQ] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.89 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.81 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 121 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Please provide answers to the following questions Time: 24 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US

 

[Azazael]

Hmm. Not sure why you are making up stuff. You ignored my PM, and chose to post it here instead, along with your response. I am not the requester either.

I PMed you the message "TO said the rejections were overturned. Why not change the TO to reflect that? You did post on 2 forums that you would update TO. Inaccurate TO doesn't help workers or requesters."

Also, the requester did nothing wrong. You failed to consent to their research. They can not use that data. Why should they pay for data they can't use? Others were able to check the consent box. Take some responsibility for your error.

See therein lies the part where you dont seem to know the entire issue. The req pretty much blanket rejected everyone (yeah TO has a few people that said right off they were approved, but really? yeah...think not). The excuses ranged from missing AC to missing the consent. Right off I spent a GOOD chunk of time on that and I personally KNOW I did NOT miss any AC like i was told I did, I can't speak for others but when you see that 90%+ of the people seemed to have a rejection, there is a problem. As for paying for data she couldn't use. TDB, I don't have any pity for how she treated workers, and this email I got about her "not having her mturk email set up correctly", I call bullshit on that. People went to her IRB, IRB said, no...you are in the wrong, pay them. And yeah, I'm sure she used the data. But thats my 2c on this debacle

 

[Squatty]

Title: 15-20 minute rate feedback survey for volleyball team(~ 20 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Elizabeth Johnson [A28GBD3FVM2SXR] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 5.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.62 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.96 Promptness Number of Reviews: 31 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Rate the feedback given to volleyball team Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.00 Qualifications: Exc: [682477262-17257] has not been granted;Total approved HITs is not less than 1000;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 98;Location is one of: US

 

[Concise]

See therein lies the part where you dont seem to know the entire issue. The req pretty much blanket rejected everyone (yeah TO has a few people that said right off they were approved, but really? yeah...think not). The excuses ranged from missing AC to missing the consent. Right off I spent a GOOD chunk of time on that and I personally KNOW I did NOT miss any AC like i was told I did, I can't speak for others but when you see that 90%+ of the people seemed to have a rejection, there is a problem. As for paying for data she couldn't use. TDB, I don't have any pity for how she treated workers, and this email I got about her "not having her mturk email set up correctly", I call bullshit on that. People went to her IRB, IRB said, no...you are in the wrong, pay them. And yeah, I'm sure she used the data. But thats my 2c on this debacle

re: Cordelia E. Davis rejection HIT:

I appreciate you sharing your experience, ty.

 

[cassius]

I'm chasing pennies here - and trying to ignore my cat, who is at the doorwall with something dead hanging out of his mouth that he would like to give me for lunch <gag> ---- I'm going to take a shower and do some housework. Have a good day y'all.

Mine brought in a live grasshopper. I don't know what he did with it. I'll probably find it when I move something in a few days.

 

[Azazael]

I appreciate you sharing your experience, ty.

np, this was a debacle from the word go, i am really sorry i linked you that survey. if i had known it was going to be this big of a shitfest I would have kept it to myself instead of sharing it.


BTW...TOTALLY OFFTOPIC

who in the world is "Meg" from the irc channel? he/she keeps joining/parting/rejoining constantly like something is broken on their end.