- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Messages
- 20,910
- Reaction score
- 61,580
- Points
- 1,488
Guys... please check your emails before posting them, no qual info please.
i emailed a requestor a few weeks ago who had used the block to limit people. She advised it was easier than setting a qual. I advised her it would be better to use a qual because this type of block is not meant to be used as a qualifier/screener. I don't think it was the same requestor. You should email.The Requester (paclab) has chosen to prevent you from working on any of this Requester's HITs.
Title: How good are you at perceiving emotions? | PANDA
Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester
Requester: paclab [A296Y2VRRO9YUE] (Contact)
TO 1: [Pay: 5.00] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 2.33] [Fair: 2.33] [Reviews: 12] [ToS: 0]
TO 2: Not Available
Description: We will show you videos of people telling stories, and your job is to rate how you think they feel at every moment.
Time: 2 hours
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $3.50
Qualifications: Location is US;
There are a variety of reasons for Requesters to prevent particular Workers from completing their HITs.
I have never done any HITs for this requester
If it's like last time, yes you'll still have to do a second roudn.Greetings from Amazon Mechanical Turk,
You are receiving this email because a requester has granted you the following qualification:
Qualification: VacationRentalAPI Advanced Research Master Applicant
Requester: VacationrentalAPI
Qualification Value: 100
So does this mean I don't have a 2nd test as some have suggested???
no the "applicant" part is not on the actual qual.Greetings from Amazon Mechanical Turk,
You are receiving this email because a requester has granted you the following qualification:
Qualification: VacationRentalAPI Advanced Research Master Applicant
Requester: VacationrentalAPI
Qualification Value: 100
So does this mean I don't have a 2nd test as some have suggested???
Oops, it didn't occur to me they would use the same one again. My apologies.Also (everyone, not just you) what you got wrong is information from the qual test so please don't share it in case they use the same one again. Thanks!
Mine was originally like this and then I got a follow-up email regarding the second test. You should get it soon if you haven't yetGreetings from Amazon Mechanical Turk,
You are receiving this email because a requester has granted you the following qualification:
Qualification: VacationRentalAPI Advanced Research Master Applicant
Requester: VacationrentalAPI
Qualification Value: 100
So does this mean I don't have a 2nd test as some have suggested???
Hopefully she will change it. Those hard blocks suck lol.i emailed a requestor a few weeks ago who had used the block to limit people. She advised it was easier than setting a qual. I advised her it would be better to use a qual because this type of block is not meant to be used as a qualifier/screener. I don't think it was the same requestor. You should email.
Plus it says in the instructions that even with the littlest typo, you should just set yourself on fire...Dont' bother. That minus sign is important and they are really strict about thwe 100% correct stuff. Just hope for better luck next time.
Honestly, couldn't tell you. I just went with what you said in your plea. But if either (or both) were wrong they still woulda said no because they are like really strict because it's really important for what they do.Oops, it didn't occur to me they would use the same one again. My apologies.
It was the absence of the minus sign that was the error, right; not the 4th and 5th place differences in the decimals?
Plus it says in the instructions that even with the littlest typo, you should just set yourself on fire...
If you still have the answer you submitted, PM it to me and I will check and tell you what the problem was.Oops, it didn't occur to me they would use the same one again. My apologies.
It was the absence of the minus sign that was the error, right; not the 4th and 5th place differences in the decimals?
mmm roasted turkeyPlus it says in the instructions that even with the littlest typo, you should just set yourself on fire...
My auto-fill left out a word- so I let the auto-fill win, as per instructions, even though I felt it was wrong...Plus it says in the instructions that even with the littlest typo, you should just set yourself on fire...
Yes, the autofill isn't always right (99.9% of the time it is) . I go with what is on the parcel website as the best address.My auto-fill left out a word- so I let the auto-fill win, as per instructions, even though I felt it was wrong...
so I also get to set myself on fire now.
The minus sign could literally be the difference between the coordinates pointing to California or China, so I'm guessing that was the issue.Oops, it didn't occur to me they would use the same one again. My apologies.
It was the absence of the minus sign that was the error, right; not the 4th and 5th place differences in the decimals?
I was just following the instructionsYes, the autofill isn't always right (99.9% of the time it is) . I go with what is on the parcel website as the best address.