07/10 - Milksteak Monday

[turkLion]

Yes.

"It is important that the question asked by the user is asked in a way that elicits the bot to respond in a manner that will encourage the user to click the link or guide them in that direction after you answer their initial inquiry."

Do we have to put the link from the examples. I think @Squatty said something earlier about responding with something like, "Please click the link in the original email."

 

[PhantomCatt]

Okay. I've been getting a lot that don't so I just feel kind of bad...

Click, click, click the link all the way to the bank!!! lalalalala... or something like that

 

[Lila. B.]

See, this is the part I'm still confused on. Neither of his examples refers to the link.

Yeah. That's what I was confused about. He should use new examples to match his instructions.

 

[nopoopwarez]

The example answers given do not include any mention of the link.

Yep. Vague instructions make them difficult. I'm sure that's been pointed out to him already and he still hasn't changed it.

 

[coffeeowl]

Yeah. That's what I was confused about. He should use new examples to match his instructions.

Same problem as last time. Instructions don't match exactly on the writing/review HITs. Clearer examples would be a big help if you are out there Mr. Sites.

 

[nopoopwarez]

Do we have to put the link from the examples. I think @Squatty said something earlier about responding with something like, "Please click the link in the original email."

I think that means don't include specific links. Mentioning the link that was provided in the first email sounds about right.

 

[charlie]

how many different ways can one ask the same question? my brain hurts and I've only done 4.

 

[ALinAL]

Same problem as last time. Instructions don't match exactly on the writing/review HITs. Clearer examples would be a big help if you are out there Mr. Sites.

One of the reasons I'm not doing the review hits. Regardless, all of mine approved and I'm done for the night. Kinda hurts to leave over $1,000 dollars just sittin' on the table, but screw it. Made goal.

 

[charlie]

Same problem as last time. Instructions don't match exactly on the writing/review HITs. Clearer examples would be a big help if you are out there Mr. Sites.

the instructions counter each other. I sent an email asking for clarification but haven't gotten a response back yet. If i'm ok to share the email here let me know and I will.

 

[humbleturker]

It is so obvious who doesn't read the directions on these.

 

[Kadauchi]

the instructions counter each other. I sent an email asking for clarification but haven't gotten a response back yet. If i'm ok to share the email here let me know and I will.

Just edit out email address and any identify information for you.

 

[TSolo315]

Yes.

"It is important that the question asked by the user is asked in a way that elicits the bot to respond in a manner that will encourage the user to click the link or guide them in that direction after you answer their initial inquiry."

Not every answer has to directly refer to the link.

They should always try to instill trust in the user so they feel more inclined to click the link, but don't always have to say CLICK THE LINK! They should definitely not encourage anything else, like contacting support or ignoring the email.

I must be missing why people are confused.

 

[Kathryn]

Title: Survey(~ 6 minutes) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: DecisionMakingPro [A14NXGT5K0ORLF] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.44] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 11] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $12.00/hr] [Pen: -- days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: -- of 0] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: survey Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.60 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100; Masters has been granted; Exc: [49579-49564] has not been granted; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 80; Location is one of: US;

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.11​

1 min

 

[charlie]

Just edit out email address and any identify information for you.

This email is to confirm a password reset was just requested for your account.
This is a reject link if and only if the end user didn't request the password reset correct?
If you did not request this, please visit the following link to dispute:
https://secure.social-tech.com/acco...est/?uuid=9431edpoks&language=en&reset=reject
Otherwise you will be locked out of your SocialTech account.
Thank you, SocialTech

How does one verify that the password was change was valid? is the company expecting that the end user will reach out to support to confirm? If the idea is we are to direct the end user to a reject link it doesn't make sense UNLESS that reject link is actually a page that has confirm and reject options.
Someone requested a password change. We want to verify this is you.
Please verify if this was not you so that you will not be locked out of your account.
Otherwise you will be locked out of your SocialTech account.
I'm a bit confused and just want to make sure the right process is followed.

 

[basketcasey]

Not every answer has to directly refer to the link.

They should always try to instill trust in the user so they feel more inclined to click the link, but don't always have to say CLICK THE LINK! They should definitely not encourage anything else, like contacting support or ignoring the email.

I must be missing why people are confused.

I think reviewers are rejecting for people not directly referring to the link though. Can we compare hit instructions between the writing and review hits? That might help sort it out. I haven't done any review hits. Has anyone here done both?

 

[Squatty]

Title: Making decisions based on images you see | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Stanford MemoryLab [A24ESJK62ZBAZ3] (Contact) TO 1: Not Available TO 2: Not Available Description: Making decisions based on images you see Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $3.75 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 50; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 80; Location is US;

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.21.11​

 

[charlie]

I think reviewers are rejecting for people not directly referring to the link though. Can we compare hit instructions between the writing and review hits? That might help sort it out. I haven't done any review hits. Has anyone here done both?

i'm directing people to the reject link on each question. I don't like that it's a reject URL when there's a note that the idea is to verify the request.

 

[Lila. B.]

Your task is to validate that the Question is something a user might respond with and that the Answer is appropriate and guides the user to following the bot's request.

 

[basketcasey]

Eric Sites' inbox right now.

 

[Peachy]

I'm a Peach and you can't teach that
Bada bing bada boom realest fruit in the room