- Joined
- Apr 29, 2017
- Messages
- 10,061
- Reaction score
- 29,333
- Points
- 1,688
- Age
- 37
- Location
- South Carolina
- Gender
- Female
Title: Answer a survey that asks your thoughts on people's online reviews of tennis shoes. | PANDA Requester: Weiting Tao [A1O3I4EC77PV5Y] (TO) TO Ratings: 5.00 Communicativity 3.00 Generosity 5.00 Fairness 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 5 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinion after reading people's online reviews of tennis shoes. It will take about 5 minutes to complete. $0.3 will be rewarded to accurate and complete responses. Time: 30 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 5000; HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 97; Location is US |
That's a given
With a shot of whiskey.
Title: Describe an image (6) | PANDA Requester: hybrid lab, HUJI [A14IABZ7DMN9C5] (TO) TO Ratings: 5.00 Communicativity 5.00 Generosity 5.00 Fairness 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 3 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Please view and state 3 objects from the image. If you've alredy did one of 1-8 Hybrid Lab HITs on Aug 14-28 Please DO NOT do another one. Time: 15 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.35 Qualifications: completed task has not been granted; Location is US |
just for example, a $.20 survey I just did had a red rating but...what hits
ah...maybe it was for a different hitjust for example, a $.20 survey I just did had a red rating but...
Time: 00:17
Hourly: $41.64
but the majority of hits with a TO2 rating have are red, even though it comes out to a good hourly rating. I dunno, I'm just confusedah...maybe it was for a different hit
Also see good requesters with horrible TOs just because there is a screener.Colors don't mean much. You have to read the reviews for each hit. If no one's left a review for the hit you're doing it doesn't help determine hourly, but it can give you a sense of what the requester is like. Then there's the people that rate 1/5 because they got screened out. And don't forget how many requesters get 1 bombed when they first start because they don't know any better.
"Mass rejected and blocked by this requester, stay away. Only did 2000 hits in 30 minutes, not sure what the problem is."Also see good requesters with horrible TOs just because there is a screener.
Those are my favorite whiny butthurt TO reviews.
Title: 22-27 minute research study (with potential bonus)(~ 28 minutes) | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: MPR Lab [A1D3TEW14SPDKU] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.89] [Fast: 4.91] [Comm: 4.26] [Fair: 4.88] [Reviews: 200] [ToS: 1] TO 2: [Rate: $5.94/hr] [Pen: 0.04 days] [Res: 0% of 1] [Rec: 43% of 7] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $2.50 Duration: 1 hour Available: 1 Description: Participate in a research task Requirements: Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; Exc: [1679305334-54221] DoesNotExist ; SurveyGroup [571] DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 97; Location In US; |
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.25.5 |
Better them doing that instead of turning in low quality work.there be a lotta dumb people writing TOs
I have been seeing a lot of this. You're gonna leave a 1 or shitty TO because you weren't what they were looking for? This is exactly why I check the reviews. Colors aren't everything.Colors don't mean much. You have to read the reviews for each hit. If no one's left a review for the hit you're doing it doesn't help determine hourly, but it can give you a sense of what the requester is like. Then there's the people that rate 1/5 because they got screened out. And don't forget how many requesters get 1 bombed when they first start because they don't know any better.
it seems to just get worsethere be a lotta dumb people writing TOs
Title: Imagining Counterfactual (Alternative) Scenarios NEW | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: IMC Lab [A1T434NH13YMQU] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.45] [Fast: 4.67] [Comm: 4.83] [Fair: 4.79] [Reviews: 29] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $12.71/hr] [Pen: 1.80 days] [Res: 100% of 1] [Rec: 67% of 9] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Reward: $8.00 Duration: 3 hours Available: 1 Description: You will read about different counterfactual events, you will be asked to imagine each counterfactual event, and you will then provide several subjective ratings. Requirements: SimilarityPlausibility DoesNotExist ; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 85; Location EqualTo US; |
HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.25.5 |