04/26 - Tablo Tuesday!

[thedorchannel]

Pay raise on the crappy ssears.

Title: Find Basic Company Information | PANDA Requester: ssears [AZBJZYIYDKMLF] (Contact) (TO):[Pay: 4.15][Fair: 4.33][Comm: 3.60][Fast: 3.85] Description: Given a URL, find basic company information Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1097 Reward: $0.10 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000, HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95

lool I guess nobody got the country and zip codes from the last batch

 

[Melly]

I only submitted 3 Scripts 2 were rejected and 1 still has 2 min left for AA

 

[Liz]

6 approved, 4 rejected.

And they're super random as to which ones they are. My first was approved and that was arguably the one I did the worst on. I don't get it at all.

8 approved 4 rejected.

 

[terp]

6 approved, 4 rejected.

And they're super random as to which ones they are. My first was approved and that was arguably the one I did the worst on. I don't get it at all.

they originally rejected 8 randomly to begin, and have now approved the next 9 in order of queue. I suspect an algo rejected based on some weird criteria and now they're manually approved down the list.

 

[Bigbore]

looks like its time to put on some music, crack open a rockstar and crank out some ssears

 

[essjay]

they originally rejected 8 randomly to begin, and have now approved the next 9 in order of queue. I suspect an algo rejected based on some weird criteria and now they're manually approved down the list.

My approvals are all at AA. I meant I don't understand the rejections cos they didn't even happen in the order I did them. Bleh.

 

[CindyLoUUWho]

I submitted 5 scripts. All approved.

 

[Tigerpants]

Title: Newspaper Study | PANDA Requester: Jeff Galak [A3VPD9AS82KSIZ] (TO) TO Ratings: ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.05 Communicativity ☭☭☭☭☭ 3.80 Generosity ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.47 Fairness ☭☭☭☭☭ 4.53 Promptness Number of Reviews: 79 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: In this study you will read a newspaper article and answer some questions about (Total time = about 5 minutes) Time: 3 hours Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.50 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95; Location is US

 

[PineApple]

There was someone recently that fell into this category. I can't remember who it was, but they went all post-apocalyptic, Priscilla Queen of the Desert on some requester by emailing everyone they had ever been associated with in college, or something insane.

@PineApple , you remember who it was?

I should add, it was over like a quarter or something. I mean, c'mon.

OMG what was his name, the doxxed the crap outta them, found all their college information, that was on the other forum IIRC.

 

[Squatty]

Title: Video Ratings Pre-survey ~ 5 min | PANDA Requester: SCN Surveys [A05127962JF89F85P2RSO] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 5.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 4.78 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 40 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Answer demographic questions for a followup survey in which you rate videos about offering support to others. Time: 45 minutes HITs Available: 111 Reward: $0.25 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 90;Shared Experiences 1 has not been granted;Location is US

1 minute

 

[electrolyte]

There was someone recently that fell into this category. I can't remember who it was, but they went all post-apocalyptic, Priscilla Queen of the Desert on some requester by emailing everyone they had ever been associated with in college, or something insane.

@PineApple , you remember who it was?

I should add, it was over like a quarter or something. I mean, c'mon.

<3 Priscilla reference.

 

[terp]

My approvals are all at AA. I meant I don't understand the rejections cos they didn't even happen in the order I did them. Bleh.

ah, that makes sense then as to why they're going in order. COME ON AA

currently at 11/8... if i get to 32/8, ill be very happy and will consider it worthwhile

 

[Zodiac]

OMG what was his name, the doxxed the crap outta them, found all their college information, that was on the other forum IIRC.

I feel like it just happened in IRC like a month ago. You know I can't remember far enough back to remember the old forum.

 

[terp]

Dear Turker,

I'm sorry to say that we needed to reject one or multiple of your HITs. The reason for this the following: We use an automatic algorithm that checks for violations of the instructions. Thus, you had at least one answer that violated these instructions, which does not mean we rejected someone just because of a wrong answer. This is why you need to be careful not to use things like verbs or articles like "the","an" etc.
Also, rejection is not related to the number of HITs you did, as some of you were concerned.

Please note:
HITs that have not been rejected yet will be approved automatically soon.

Best,
scripts

 

[Zodiac]

Dear Turker,

I'm sorry to say that we needed to reject one or multiple of your HITs. The reason for this the following: We use an automatic algorithm that checks for violations of the instructions. Thus, you had at least one answer that violated these instructions, which does not mean we rejected someone just because of a wrong answer. This is why you need to be careful not to use things like verbs or articles like "the","an" etc.
Also, rejection is not related to the number of HITs you did, as some of you were concerned.

Please note:
HITs that have not been rejected yet will be approved automatically soon.

Best,
scripts

 

[Raven]

Dear Turker,

I'm sorry to say that we needed to reject one or multiple of your HITs. The reason for this the following: We use an automatic algorithm that checks for violations of the instructions. Thus, you had at least one answer that violated these instructions, which does not mean we rejected someone just because of a wrong answer. This is why you need to be careful not to use things like verbs or articles like "the","an" etc.
Also, rejection is not related to the number of HITs you did, as some of you were concerned.

Please note:
HITs that have not been rejected yet will be approved automatically soon.

Best,
scripts

Uh oh.

 

[Bode "Emo Barry" Miller]

Title: Yale psychology study - Same or different? | PANDA Requester: Yale Cognition & Development Lab [A1B2ILT2409W4R] (TO) TO Ratings: 3.18 Communicativity 3.46 Generosity 4.40 Fairness 4.52 Promptness Number of Reviews: 161 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Long (20-30 minute) study on how we perceive events #11311013027 Time: 1 hour 30 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $4.00 Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 90; Location is US

 

[Kerek]

Heh, I hope they stand tall because that's probably true about the instructions.

 

[Bode "Emo Barry" Miller]

Dear Turker,

I'm sorry to say that we needed to reject one or multiple of your HITs. The reason for this the following: We use an automatic algorithm that checks for violations of the instructions. Thus, you had at least one answer that violated these instructions, which does not mean we rejected someone just because of a wrong answer. This is why you need to be careful not to use things like verbs or articles like "the","an" etc.
Also, rejection is not related to the number of HITs you did, as some of you were concerned.

Please note:
HITs that have not been rejected yet will be approved automatically soon.

Best,
scripts

To be fair, I'm okay with this response because 2/10 got rejected and I definitely remember accidentally using adjectives a few times instead of nouns

 

[terp]

Heh, I hope they stand tall because that's probably true about the instructions.

I responded:

Every hit in which I used an article was a result of me choosing the correct answer and getting told it was incorrect and I needed to guess a new word and I was unsure of what was to follow.

The system was wacky and frustrating, and now us workers are feeling the pain as a result.



Every time it happened it was out of frustration after being told a correct answer was incorrect, or clicking the correct noun to be told it's wrong.