06/30 - Three Six Thursday

Status
Not open for further replies.

JenniLeigh

Batch Betta Have My Money
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
23,084
Reaction score
46,895
Points
1,388
Location
my napping spot
Gender
Female
5y/o (six in less than a week!) trying to sound out words. Pretty sure "Doofenshmirtz" is wrong (no matter how much we love Phineas and Ferb) so I go look. It was "deforestation." Not a bad attempt, though.
Oh! My heart! :D
 
  • Like
Reactions: essjay

Squatty

.
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Mar 17, 2016
Messages
21,286
Reaction score
44,989
Points
2,538
Age
36
Gender
Female
Title: Financial Task (6/30/2016) | PANDA
Requester: Stanford GSB Behavioral Lab [A3OSXTUM1QEXNY] (TO)
TO Ratings:
★★★★★ 3.77 Communicativity
★★★★★ 3.72 Generosity
★★★★ 4.45 Fairness
★★★★ 4.34 Promptness
Number of Reviews: 407 | TOS Flags: 4
Submit a new TO review
Description: $0.60 for 6 minutes, with additional bonus!
Time: 3 hours
HITs Available: 97
Reward: $0.60
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95;Location is US
 

James

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
1,903
Points
413
People who post surveys with time estimates of 15-20 minutes that pay $0.40 but actually take less time are just as bad as people who post the ones that take longer.
It's kinda tricky, because TO is helpful but also unhelpful. Consistently bad TO is a tip-off for sure, but I've found plenty of great requesters who had little or no TO because we all like to keep good secrets quiet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Devil_Dawg

Sondi

Goddess of soup
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
9,018
Reaction score
33,771
Points
1,213
Age
35
Gender
Female
:redpandano:

People who post surveys with time estimates of 15-20 minutes that pay $0.40 but actually take less time are just as bad as people who post the ones that take the full estimated time.
I read the TO wrong before I posted it :p I was looking at the hit above it on scraper which was a '5' for pay
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kerek

Kerek

Red Cat-Bear
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
65,302
Reaction score
145,849
Points
2,088
Gender
Male
It's kinda tricky, because TO is helpful but also unhelpful. Consistently bad TO is a tip-off for sure, but I've found plenty of great requesters who had little or no TO because we all like to keep good secrets quiet.
It's not even about TO to me. It's about them knowingly posting a poorly paying survey. Even if it pays better than they think, they're still history's second greatest monster behind a certain admin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: James and DONTDOIT

James

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
1,903
Points
413
It's not even about TO to me. It's about them knowingly posting a poorly paying survey. Even if it pays better than they think, they're still history's second greatest monster behind a certain admin.
I don't know about the admin (I could take a guess...) but I agree. Just sayin' that TO cuts both ways.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kerek

Sondi

Goddess of soup
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
9,018
Reaction score
33,771
Points
1,213
Age
35
Gender
Female
Title: Answer an opinion survey about political issues | PANDA
Requester: Christopher Hare [A8KPRCAB4INJR] (TO)
TO Ratings:
★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity
★★★★★ 5.00 Generosity
★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness
★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness
Number of Reviews: 3 | TOS Flags: 0
Submit a new TO review
Description: Give us your opinion about issues in the 2016 election in a two-minute survey
Time: 60 minutes
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $0.25
Qualifications: Masters has been granted;Location is US
1min
 

catnapped

Relatively Unknown Member
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
20,908
Reaction score
43,057
Points
2,738
Age
52
Location
Pennsylvania
Gender
Male
Title: Earn $1.00 for recording a short video! (Qualification Round for a large study to earn $25) | PANDA
Requester: ROCSpeak [A3Q6P0Y5BX73AE] (TO)
TO Ratings:
★★★★ 4.33 Communicativity
★★★★★ 3.70 Generosity
★★★★ 4.63 Fairness
★★★★ 4.25 Promptness
Number of Reviews: 35 | TOS Flags: 2
Submit a new TO review
Description: Record yourself speaking (no more than 2 minutes). You may receive the qualification to participate in the a large study for improving public speaking and earn $25 upon completion. If you complete a HIT similar to this recently, please do not accept this.
Time: 3 hours
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $1.00
Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Location is US
 
  • Like
Reactions: <Gucci>

<Gucci>

Francis Manancis ...fuck you...
Threaderator
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Feb 6, 2016
Messages
13,614
Reaction score
29,767
Points
1,739
Age
39
Location
Detroit
Gender
Female
Title: Earn $1.00 for recording a short video! (Qualification Round for a large study to earn $25) | PANDA
Requester: ROCSpeak [A3Q6P0Y5BX73AE] (TO)
TO Ratings:
★★★★ 4.33 Communicativity
★★★★★ 3.70 Generosity
★★★★ 4.63 Fairness
★★★★ 4.25 Promptness
Number of Reviews: 35 | TOS Flags: 2
Submit a new TO review
Description: Record yourself speaking (no more than 2 minutes). You may receive the qualification to participate in the a large study for improving public speaking and earn $25 upon completion. If you complete a HIT similar to this recently, please do not accept this.
Time: 3 hours
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $1.00
Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 1000;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Location is US
 

kryss

carburante al fuoco
Former Admin
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
20,910
Reaction score
61,580
Points
1,488
TO is really fine the way it is, there's upsides and downsides to it. I think if it was less policed in reference to how people rate, it would be just fine. Everyone has their own definitions of fair pay. Use it for context/content and not for facts. You still need to be able to use your own judgement when working on HITs.
 

James

Well-Known Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2016
Messages
1,072
Reaction score
1,903
Points
413
TO is really fine the way it is, there's upsides and downsides to it. I think if it was less policed in reference to how people rate, it would be just fine. Everyone has their own definitions of fair pay. Use it for context/content and not for facts. You still need to be able to use your own judgement when working on HITs.
Agreed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: <Gucci> and kryss

sinon

Watashi ga Kita!
Contributor
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
3,014
Reaction score
7,112
Points
838
Gender
Female
TO is really fine the way it is, there's upsides and downsides to it. I think if it was less policed in reference to how people rate, it would be just fine. Everyone has their own definitions of fair pay. Use it for context/content and not for facts. You still need to be able to use your own judgement when working on HITs.
:yesyes:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kerek and kryss

Roscoe E Goldchain

Hood Haiku Specialist
Contributor
HIT Poster
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
11,770
Reaction score
28,998
Points
1,438
Location
VA
Gender
Male

catnapped

Relatively Unknown Member
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
HIT Poster
Joined
Jan 13, 2016
Messages
20,908
Reaction score
43,057
Points
2,738
Age
52
Location
Pennsylvania
Gender
Male

Roscoe E Goldchain

Hood Haiku Specialist
Contributor
HIT Poster
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
11,770
Reaction score
28,998
Points
1,438
Location
VA
Gender
Male
Title: Predicting politics (10-12 min, $1.40) | PANDA
Requester: Jeffrey Friedman [A3MA9NWI8ALQYK] (TO)
TO Ratings:
★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity
★★★★★ 5.00 Generosity
★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness
★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness
Number of Reviews: 18 | TOS Flags: 0
Submit a new TO review
Description: Give opinions about domestic and foreign policy events
Time: 2 hours
HITs Available: 1
Reward: $1.40
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 90;Total approved HITs is greater than 50;Location is US
 
Status
Not open for further replies.