Last time I did it I set up a paypal and accepted donations to increase the payouts and stuff. I'm not doing that this year, but maybe next year if it goes over well. I want to make sure all my scripts and setup are correct before I do that, just to be sure.
I need to set up keyword emails or something. I'll check it out and get a fix in asap.
| Title: Assessing Leader Behavior: Study 1E(a) | Accept Requester: Paul Hanges [AR46A55MLYOB] Contact TV: [Hrly=$15.40] [Pay=Generous] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=1] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=2.42] [Fast=2.33] [Comm=2.75] [Fair=2.50] [Reviews=12] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 2.50 Duration: 1:00:00 Available: 1 Description: In this survey, you’ll be asked to evaluate the positivity or negativity of a leader’s behavior. This will take you approximately 30 minutes or less, for which you’ll receive $2.50. Qualifications: Total approved HITs GreaterThan 1000; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThan 97; Employment Status: Unemployed EqualTo 0; Location EqualTo US |
Many now look at things as even "bad pizza is still pizza," some just want to publish results at the lowest cost so they can do more studies and become more "known and accomplished" in their area. I can do one study with $1000 and pay 500 people $2, or do two studies and pay 500 people $1 and so on and so on. I publish more, I look cooler, and for many even bad data is still data. (And no doubt there are some very ethical researcher(s) that are operating on limited funding and doing their best for a good cause.)
No idea how some of you people pull off these numbers! But congrats to you!PE $227.41
I'm going to bed, and NOTHING IS ALLOWED TO POST UNTIL I GET UP
| Title: Recordings and Recommendations(~ 8 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Stanford GSB Behavioral Lab [A3OSXTUM1QEXNY] (Req TV): $13.76/hr/hr (TO): [Pay: 3.25] [Fair: 4.36] [Comm: 3.42] [Fast: 4.15] Description: earn .96 in 8 minutes! Time: 1 hour(s) HITs Available: 89 Reward: $0.96 Qualifications: Exc: [1844308262-173667] DoesNotExist ; Total approved HITs GreaterThanOrEqualTo 100; HIT approval rate (%) GreaterThanOrEqualTo 95; Location In US; |
I gave up trying that one, returned it...really poorly written.
Me, too. I was hesitating after I read the reviews--that TO back history indicated poor/no communication and too many rejections...but I'd accepted it, so I tried it anyway. First thing it asked was for a name, and not MY name, either. My headache said no way right then. Returned...Requesters need to understand. While they have their values, so do we.
The fact that it was missing parts of the survey that doesn't even make sense, how do they expect to get good quality work from this?
| Title: Rate these words(~ 10 minutes) | Accept Requester: Lupyan Lab [A34Y0INWSLX4AQ] Contact TV: [Hrly=$9.76] [Pay=Fair] [Approval=1-3 days] [Comm=Unrated] [Rej=0] [Blk=0] TO: [Pay=3.40] [Fast=4.38] [Comm=2.96] [Fair=4.10] [Reviews=113] [ToS=0] TO2: No Reviews Reward: 0.96 Duration: 45:00 Available: 0 Description: Rate ~100 words on a 1-5 scale (we especially invite parents of young children) Qualifications: Not available from queue exports. |
Oh that sounds fun.. I have been turking since 2012, but this is my first Halloween in this forum.. ( I had taken almost 2 years off)
