11/05 - Snowy Sunday

[Serial Mom]

Title: Experiment on sound and concentration | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: explanoite2 [A3O2UOCTDJLVLI] (Contact) TO 1: Not Available TO 2: Not Available Description: Solve visual puzzles while listening to prerecorded sounds, music, or both Time: 45 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is greater than 500; HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 95; Location is US;

 

[corsies]

Jill Athenour Review a series of statements and indicate your level of agreement. $1.00 Rejected
Failed a statistical analysis used to indicate whether respondent was answering questions in a consistent manner.

rejected as well almost 30 days later took hit on October 7th. Doubt if she will respond.

 

[vickiJ]

I received this email this morning regarding a rejection that I and others received. (Not the requester being discussed now)

"Quite honestly this was my first usage of this platform and I've been a little taken aback by the responses for the rejections. Your's was definitely the nicest of the bunch...

I realize now i probably didn't describe the need as well as I should have, but can you help me understand why the strong responses? Is there a rating that the rejection affects?"

 

[SweetiePuff]

For everyone rejected please keep in mind it is Sunday and to not go overboard if she doesn't immediately answer you. Please don't go full bitchfork right away.

*adds bitchfork to Christmas list*

 

[A6_Foul_Out]

"Quite honestly this was my first usage of this platform "

Spoiler

Log in or register now. to view Spoiler content!

 

[cassius]

I received this email this morning regarding a rejection that I and others received. (Not the requester being discussed now)

"Quite honestly this was my first usage of this platform and I've been a little taken aback by the responses for the rejections. Your's was definitely the nicest of the bunch...

I realize now i probably didn't describe the need as well as I should have, but can you help me understand why the strong responses? Is there a rating that the rejection affects?"

You explained to them - right? And that it tanks their reputation as well.

 

[Horse Feathers]

*adds bitchfork to Christmas list*

My ex-wife had a very good one.

 

[TSolo315]

I received this email this morning regarding a rejection that I and others received. (Not the requester being discussed now)

"Quite honestly this was my first usage of this platform and I've been a little taken aback by the responses for the rejections. Your's was definitely the nicest of the bunch...

I realize now i probably didn't describe the need as well as I should have, but can you help me understand why the strong responses? Is there a rating that the rejection affects?"

Why are people upset that I completely wasted their time? I don't get it!

 

[Serial Mom]

Did anyone do this? They have a comp. hit

Title: Compensation for cocosci experiment | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Cocosci Lab at UC Berkeley [AHG3DFQ65ESGY] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 4.11] [Fast: 4.82] [Comm: 4.46] [Fair: 4.88] [Reviews: 389] [ToS: 0] TO 2: [Rate: $8.53/hr] [Pen: 0.04 days] [Res: -- of 0] [Rec: 75% of 4] [Rej: 0] [ToS: 0] [Brk: 0] Description: Only accept this HIT if you were emailed a completion code Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 4 Reward: $0.01 Qualifications: None;

 

[Starslip]

Title: Point Memory Game 2 (Bonus up to $1.50) [170] | PANDA Requester: William Dallinger [AUYKYIHQXG6XR] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 4.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.60 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 31 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Remember the exact position of a small red dot inside a large image (bonus of up to $1.50) Time: 33 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.20 Qualifications: None

Took 16-17 minutes I think and was only marginally worth it even with the bonus

 

[VGB]

Why are people upset that I completely wasted their time? I don't get it!

to be fair, having seen some responses to requesters in the past, communication isn't a strong suit for a large portion of workers

 

[Starslip]

to be fair, having seen some responses to requesters in the past, communication isn't a strong suit for a large portion of workers

Having seen TO, I'd definitely agree with this.

 

[Starslip]

Title: Answer a 1-question qualification screener | PANDA Requester: Weihuang Wong [A2SCR857XSOXSO] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 5.00 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 5 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Qualified respondents will be paid $0.75 for completing survey (5 minutes). MIT-sponsored study. Time: 60 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.05 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100;Completed HG has not been granted;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Location is US

one question screen is accurate, then if you qual the survey is 3 minutes or so for 75 cents

 

[Starslip]

Title: Short quick survey about personality and opinions. ~15-20 minutes and $1.01.(~ 20 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Daniel Effron [ABYA45QW0GOG1] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 3.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.09 Generosity ★★★★★ 4.50 Fairness ★★★★★ 4.78 Promptness Number of Reviews: 30 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: In this survey, you will answer questions about perceptions and personality traits. Time: 2 hours HITs Available: 33 Reward: $1.01 Qualifications: Total approved HITs is not less than 100;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Exc: [2033844-63174] has not been granted;Location is one of: US

 

[Deleted member 526]

Title: Perception and Judgment of Number Rules Study | PANDA Requester: University of Richmond Cave Lab [A3ERH5CKWY17T0] (TO) TO Ratings: ????? 3.33 Communicativity ????? 3.15 Generosity ????? 4.95 Fairness ????? 4.82 Promptness Number of Reviews: 46 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: This study looks how people interact with problems or rules in subjects such as algebra, physics, engineering, and science. You may be asked to solve problems or make simple judgments. Your session is expected to last ~10 minutes. Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.75 Qualifications: Masters has been granted; Location is US

3:50

 

[Starslip]

Greetings from Amazon Mechanical Turk,

You've received a bonus from William Dallinger for work related to 31SIZS5W59876ICY7L6FELPW345QRY.
The value of your bonus is: $1.42 USD

The Requester included this note:
Thank for participating! Here is your bonus.

Thanks for being a Worker on Mechanical Turk!

From the point memory, so at least the bonus comes quick

 

[Deleted member 526]

Title: Answer a survey about your opinions | PANDA Requester: Ryan Hamilton [A39K0LU7SBU1G3] (TO) TO Ratings: ????? 0.00 Communicativity ????? 5.00 Generosity ????? 5.00 Fairness ????? 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 7 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinion about our ad Time: 30 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.75 Qualifications: Masters has been granted

1:31

 

[Starslip]

Title: Decision-Making Survey | PANDA Worker: Preview | Accept | Requester Requester: Imai [A22Q56KNXT93X1] (Contact) TO 1: [Pay: 3.67] [Fast: 5.00] [Comm: 0.00] [Fair: 5.00] [Reviews: 3] [ToS: 0] TO 2: Not Available Reward: $2.00 Duration: 2 hours Available: 1 Description: An academic survey for understanding how people make decisions. Requirements: Masters has been granted; Location is US

HIT exported from Mturk Suite v1.25.8​

 

[Deleted member 526]

Title: Answer a survey about searching for recipes and cooking | PANDA Requester: Lisa Forero [A3QFZ0J79E9YN8] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: Give us your opinion about what's important to you on a recipe site. Time: 15 minutes Hits Available: 1 Reward: $0.20 Qualifications: Masters has been granted

1:26

 

[Jaded]

I received this email this morning regarding a rejection that I and others received. (Not the requester being discussed now)

"Quite honestly this was my first usage of this platform and I've been a little taken aback by the responses for the rejections. Your's was definitely the nicest of the bunch...

I realize now i probably didn't describe the need as well as I should have, but can you help me understand why the strong responses? Is there a rating that the rejection affects?"

I understand being irritated at a rejection but people fly off the handle w/out actually approaching them civilly first and if that were me I'd block the fuck out of them*.

>.>

*Not the nice ones