11/26 - Scarves Saturday!

[kryss]

The REAL question here is... how in the F does Big Requester acquire these pics? I think this is why you don't want video cameras running anywhere in your home.

It's in the TOS when you buy the baby monitor. We looked it up last time iirc.

 

[YAHU]

"You're such a well-spoken young man, forming complete sentences and everything".

this... actually this one is the most irritating...

"wow your english is so good"

 

[SweetiePuff]

The REAL question here is... how in the F does Big Requester acquire these pics? I think this is why you don't want video cameras running anywhere in your home.

I know! I'm so curious ... esp with that dad running around in the buff!

 

[electrolyte]

It's in the TOS when you buy the baby monitor. We looked it up last time iirc.

Yeah, I just looked it up again. The TOS for this brand of baby monitor says they can use the collected information for research.

 

[TQueen]

@Vanyanka

 

[SweetiePuff]

Yeah, I just looked it up again. The TOS for this brand of baby monitor says they can use the collected information for research.

But I wonder if that dad really understands that "we've" (the collective We) have seen his junk LoL

 

[SweetiePuff]

But I wonder if that dad really understands that "we've" (the collective We) have seen his junk LoL

Which reminds me ... shouldn't this requester put an Adult Qual on here?

 

[electrolyte]

But I wonder if that dad really understands that "we've" (the collective We) have seen his junk LoL

I bet 99% of the people who bought this thing didn't even read the TOS.

 

[electrolyte]

Which reminds me ... shouldn't this requester put an Adult Qual on here?

Yup.

 

[SweetiePuff]

I bet 99% of the people who bought this thing didn't even read the TOS.

I would NEVER take that bet you're right!

 

[Jharkan]

But I wonder if that dad really understands that "we've" (the collective We) have seen his junk LoL

as a naked dad, I just want to put it out there
that when the baby is crying,
my first thought isn't about putting on pants;
my first thought is about finding out if the baby is ok

 

[jan]

I bet 99% of the people who bought this thing didn't even read the TOS.

We have friends who have camera's in t heir house. I think it's terrible. The kids were like (answering my complaints) - it's okay, the tape gets rerecorded after a few days.

This didn't make me comfortable. TBH, I don't even want to go over there. I trust that my convo's around the dinner table aren't going on the internet - but, well, I don't want to be video recorded.

OTOH, when the boys get into a fight and say 'he started it' - they can pull up the tape and see just who the culprit was.

 

[Jharkan]

We have friends who have camera's in t heir house. I think it's terrible. The kids were like (answering my complaints) - it's okay, the tape gets rerecorded after a few days.

This didn't make me comfortable. TBH, I don't even want to go over there. I trust that my convo's around the dinner table aren't going on the internet - but, well, I don't want to be video recorded.

OTOH, when the boys get into a fight and say 'he started it' - they can pull up the tape and see just who the culprit was.

it's just setting us up for living our entire lives
under the watchful eyes of our robotic overlords

 

[T. Leela]

Ha, keep dreaming. If you want help or have questions feel free to ask me though.

Correct, :even :odd in this case is only relevant for a 2 radio option. If you had 3 options so choose from, one way to do it would be like this.

// This is your "counter" variable
let idx = 0;

// This adds a listener when you press a key.
document.addEventListener('keydown', (e) => {
  switch (e.which) {
    case 49: case 97:
      $(':radio').eq(0 + idx).click();
      idx += 3;
      $(':radio').eq(idx).focus();
      break;
    case 50: case 98:
      $(':radio').eq(1 + idx).click();
      idx += 3;
      $(':radio').eq(idx).focus();
      break;
    case 51: case 99:
      $(':radio').eq(2 + idx).click();
      idx += 3;
      $(':radio').eq(idx).focus();
      break;
    default: return;
  }
});

ok i will...so what makes this usable for the (or a) particular hit? or should it be?

 

[SarahAshlee90]

edited

 

[Kadauchi]

ok i will...so what makes this usable for the (or a) particular hit? or should it be?

Well if the HIT has multiple questions that have more than 2 radios for answers you would want to do something similar to this instead of using an AHK that does all sorts of tabbing.

 

[lsutiger25]

Title: Give a description of an object | PANDA Requester: Text2Voxel Project [A2KN95G5SJGZ6J] (TO) TO Ratings: 0.00 Communicativity 4.33 Generosity 5.00 Fairness 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 3 (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: In one or two sentences, describe an object. Time: 60 minutes Hits Available: 5 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: None

I've done a bunch of these and their other HITS...not to bad.

 

[kryss]

We probably shouldn't be posting pics from those HITs on the forum.

 

[Jaded]

I wonder if she knew this was on the internet

I think there's a big difference between us seeing it as workers and then us posting it on the forum.

 

[lsutiger25]

I've never done any Big Requester before- I just put them on my TM to check them out.

*Edit just did my first one, that was creepy