Title: Presidential Election Survey for Cruz Supporters Requester: Therese Rengert [A3IXJB1L3YV8X9] (TO) TO Ratings: TO Unavailable Submit a new TO review Description: We are exploring your perceptions of political candidates as leaders, your social perceptions/identification of them and with them. Time: 25 minutes HITs Available: 2 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: Location is US |
Title: Presidential Election Survey for Cruz Supporters | PANDA Requester: Therese Rengert [A3IXJB1L3YV8X9] (TO) TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester) Description: We are exploring your perceptions of political candidates as leaders, your social perceptions/identification of them and with them. Time: 25 minutes Hits Available: 2 Reward: $3.00 Qualifications: Location is US |
5/5 pay
Title: Presidential Election Survey for Cruz Supporters | PANDA
Requester: Therese Rengert [A3IXJB1L3YV8X9] (TO)
TO Ratings: No TO (Submit a new TO rating for this requester)
Description: We are exploring your perceptions of political candidates as leaders, your social perceptions/identification of them and with them.
Time: 25 minutes
Hits Available: 2
Reward: $3.00
Qualifications: Location is US
Obligatory link to what Cruz has done to MTurk before: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...ed-cruz-president-campaign-facebook-user-data
Title: Answer a 2-3 minute survey about medical decision making | PANDA Requester: AW Duke University [A2I8E7TP4MDQCE] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 0.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.29 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 8 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: The purpose of this study is to gather information about people’s preferences and decision making behaviors. Time: 30 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $0.30 Qualifications: Completed a survey has not been granted;Did a Kate Survey has not been granted;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 97;Location is US |
Title: Decision-Making Task(~ 15 minutes) | PANDA Requester: Nairne Lab [AMMQPFH8I5RJG] (TO) TO Ratings: ★★★★★ 5.00 Communicativity ★★★★★ 3.86 Generosity ★★★★★ 5.00 Fairness ★★★★★ 5.00 Promptness Number of Reviews: 9 | TOS Flags: 0 Submit a new TO review Description: Make decisions about various stimuli such as words, nonwords, sentences, pictures and/or faces. Time: 25 minutes HITs Available: 1 Reward: $1.50 Qualifications: Exc: [2140852412-12564] has not been granted;Total approved HITs is not less than 1000;HIT approval rate (%) is not less than 95;Location is one of: US |
Me too
finally
If a survey incentivizes you in the survey for a bonus to do a task and then informs you that there was no bonus at the end, is that cool? Most surveys I've taken have informed me if the bonus was real or if they wanted me to act like it was, but rarely used deception on that end. What do you think?
If they "lie" about the actual incentive but then give a flat bonus I don't see an issue. Otherwise that's just a dick move.If a survey incentivizes you in the survey for a bonus to do a task and then informs you that there was no bonus at the end, is that cool? Most surveys I've taken have informed me if the bonus was real or if they wanted me to act like it was, but rarely used deception on that end. What do you think?
If a survey incentivizes you in the survey for a bonus to do a task and then informs you that there was no bonus at the end, is that cool? Most surveys I've taken have informed me if the bonus was real or if they wanted me to act like it was, but rarely used deception on that end. What do you think?
I keep refreshing my email every 2 minutes waiting for this ...Yay
You've received a bonus from Self Control Lab 2 for work related to 3K8CQCU3KED164ZEXOW58GLT4UDNWB.
The value of your bonus is: $10.00 USD
Not cool. I'd send them this and ask that they reconsider the ethics of their HIT design: http://wiki.wearedynamo.org/index.php/Guidelines_for_Academic_RequestersIf a survey incentivizes you in the survey for a bonus to do a task and then informs you that there was no bonus at the end, is that cool? Most surveys I've taken have informed me if the bonus was real or if they wanted me to act like it was, but rarely used deception on that end. What do you think?
Glad they are rolling out though.I keep refreshing my email every 2 minutes waiting for this ...
One of the few things that would get me to leave a TO review these days.If a survey incentivizes you in the survey for a bonus to do a task and then informs you that there was no bonus at the end, is that cool? Most surveys I've taken have informed me if the bonus was real or if they wanted me to act like it was, but rarely used deception on that end. What do you think?
I think I just finished this survey. I suspected it was fake, just because of the $$ amount, but I still think it's a shitty survey design. They should at least pay SOME bonus.If a survey incentivizes you in the survey for a bonus to do a task and then informs you that there was no bonus at the end, is that cool? Most surveys I've taken have informed me if the bonus was real or if they wanted me to act like it was, but rarely used deception on that end. What do you think?