10/03 - We'll Meet Again Monday

How do you like your eggs in the morning?

  • Sunny side up

    Votes: 17 11.0%
  • Over easy

    Votes: 36 23.2%
  • Over hard

    Votes: 13 8.4%
  • Scrambled

    Votes: 50 32.3%
  • Poached

    Votes: 3 1.9%
  • Wtf does this even mean?

    Votes: 18 11.6%
  • Quiche

    Votes: 10 6.5%
  • Marshmallows

    Votes: 8 5.2%

  • Total voters
    155
Status
Not open for further replies.

lsutiger25

Well-Known Member
Contributor
Joined
Sep 16, 2016
Messages
4,999
Reaction score
8,116
Points
888
Gender
Female
Title: Decision Game and Personality | PANDA
Requester: Peter Keller [AUZRCRTFYQSY] (TO)
TO Ratings:

☢☢☢☢☢ 4.20 Communicativity
☢☢☢☢☢ 2.52 Generosity
☢☢☢☢☢ 4.68 Fairness
☢☢☢☢☢ 4.33 Promptness
Number of Reviews: 83
(Submit a new TO rating for this requester)

Description: You will play a decision game involving real money (Chance: bonus up to $15 depending on your decisions). The study will take about 9 minutes.
Time: 3 hours
Hits Available: 1
Reward: $0.25
Qualifications: HIT approval rate (%) is greater than 98

Super easy took maybe 4-5 minutes
 
  • Like
Reactions: coosa

VGB

dr. peepee poopoo
Joined
Jan 21, 2016
Messages
5,753
Reaction score
15,213
Points
1,038
Age
38
Location
Milwaukee via Boston
Gender
Male
If I left feedback on every survey that I thought was underpaid or not up to requester's usual standard then I would never get anything done on here.
This is part of the problem

The very definition of feedback includes a basis of working to improve upon a product or service

Without feedback, there is no exchange of relevant information
 

Kerek

Red Cat-Bear
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
65,107
Reaction score
145,639
Points
2,088
Gender
Male
Make sure you pay no more than $6/hr, anything more would be completely unreasonable
There was a survey earlier that said they wanted to study people engaging in economic games for public benefit rather than self interest. It paid $2.50 and was 30 minutes long.

So they're biasing their sample with low pay and then publishing about it.

"Science"
 

GoldenTemple

Serial Liker
Contributor
Joined
Jan 16, 2016
Messages
3,679
Reaction score
10,458
Points
838
Location
The universe.
Gender
Male
Thanks for the feedback! I don't recall running many $12 hits and if you got one and completed in 20 minutes, clearly we are paying too much. I will be sure to better evaluate the timing to ensure I am paying correctly.
If you post closed qual work, I just want you to know that I think you post great hits. Fantastic hits. I have done so many hits and yours are possibly the best hits I have personally ever seen.
 

Kerek

Red Cat-Bear
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
65,107
Reaction score
145,639
Points
2,088
Gender
Male
This is part of the problem

The very definition of feedback includes a basis of working to improve upon a product or service

Without feedback, there is no exchange of relevant information
Requesters can find out how much they're paying per hour without people telling them, especially on surveys.
 

mypaperheart

Active Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
950
Reaction score
2,488
Points
443
Location
SoCal
Gender
Female
Wow, I didn't know that could happen.

Never getting a flu shot again.
I didn't either. Never heard of it before but that's the only thing that changed in my life, I used to eat eggs every single day, flu shot, bam, I'm allergic to eggs. It's horrible. :(
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaded

electrolyte

The Ghost of MTurk Past
Contributor
Joined
Jan 10, 2016
Messages
19,184
Reaction score
45,979
Points
1,313
Requesters can find out how much they're paying per hour without people telling them, especially on surveys.
Eh, not very accurately if they're going off the MTurk timer or even Qualtrics page timers. That just tells you how long the worker had it accepted or sat on the pages.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kerek and Jaded

bxpretzel

Ari Gold
Contributor
HIT Poster
Joined
Jan 14, 2016
Messages
11,163
Reaction score
24,621
Points
1,438
Location
Appalachia
There was a survey earlier that said they wanted to study people engaging in economic games for public benefit rather than self interest. It paid $2.50 and was 30 minutes long.

So they're biasing their sample with low pay and then publishing about it.

"Science"
it took me 17 mins while working on other stuff
 

T. Leela

Oh Lord...
Contributor
Joined
May 12, 2016
Messages
11,050
Reaction score
14,046
Points
1,388
Location
Colorado
Gender
Female
So much sass. Let's remember to be respectful, please.
Who? not me right because I don't mean 3/4 of what I say, and don't know what I'm talking about the other 1/4. :unsure: or vice versa.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kryss

Kerek

Red Cat-Bear
Contributor
Crowd Pleaser
Joined
Jan 12, 2016
Messages
65,107
Reaction score
145,639
Points
2,088
Gender
Male
Eh, not very accurately if they're going off the MTurk timer or even Qualtrics page timers. That just tells you how long the worker had it accepted or sat on the pages.
They have bulk responses and can toss outliers. They're smart, probably. They can find out, especially if they're repeat users and/or care.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.