05/06 - Secondhand Saturday!

[kryss]

Lets all remember to be polite.

 

[SleepComa]

Jesus, Eric still up. Good day peopple!

 

[Mikeyyyyy]

new rules up if people didn't notice, don't know if these were eluded to before.

I was under the impression this is always how it was, which is why I chose to make separate q/a's and not run along dialogue. He should update the reviews with this also.

 

[Yungskell]

lol I havent turked barely all week

 

[electrolyte]

I was under the impression this is always how it was, which is why I chose to make separate q/a's and not run along dialogue. He should update the reviews with this also.

He told me he will be.

 

[Drwho10]

Thanks for that, I hadn't noticed the new rules!

I hope you make it to that water fountain...

 

[Mikeyyyyy]

lol I havent turked barely all week

That's not a valid Eric Sites Question, gonna have to mark you off for that.

 

[Bolbor]

I was under the impression this is always how it was, which is why I chose to make separate q/a's and not run along dialogue. He should update the reviews with this also.

Yeah, it still leaves a lot to be desired. god bless everyone hamming those things though, my brain's friend after like 7 and I don't really feel like fighting rejects because of shitty reviewers.

 

[lobo925]

Just got a rejection on a site, got it reversed based on a reviewer error. slow ya roll reviewers

Think I'm done for now

 

[Bode "Emo Barry" Miller]

Lets all remember to be polite.

oh
*clicks Log Out*

 

[Mikeyyyyy]

Yeah, it still leaves a lot to be desired. god bless everyone hamming those things though, my brain's friend after like 7 and I don't really feel like fighting rejects because of shitty reviewers all the time.

I've yet to have one rejected in the probably 200 I've done since he's been putting these up. Knock on wood. I'm also not a shitbag who writes random things in there either.

 

[electrolyte]

I've updated the Eric Sites requester thread with the full set of new instructions on the question/answer writing HITs: http://www.mturkcrowd.com/posts/781060/

 

[LowCalCalzone]

How people manage to come up with 150+ q/a's and not get rejected for repeating is beyond me.

 

[DebbieR]

You all are completely stressing me out about these Sites and I'm not even touching any of them. You can have my dollars thank you.

 

[Bolbor]

I've yet to have one rejected in the probably 200 I've done since he's been putting these up. Knock on wood. I'm also not a shitbag who writes random things in there either.

Interesting. I don't know, I looked over the other thread with emails and stuff before I started working on them and worked along those guidelines. I won't totally reject the idea of me being an idiot but...

 

[Drwho10]

How people manage to come up with 150+ q/a's and not get rejected for repeating is beyond me.

overly nice reviewers ?

 

[A6_Foul_Out]

How people manage to come up with 150+ q/a's and not get rejected for repeating is beyond me.

from a reviewer standpoint, how would you know?

unless he is 100% trusting the hits to do the work

 

[Sinikka]

I think one of the things that confuses me is if he doesn't want any "disregard this email" answers, it should probably specify in the instructions that the link is needed *no matter what* and not just to verify that it's NOT you. I mean, otherwise *wouldn't* the acceptable response be "No, you're all set."?

 

[TSolo315]

overly nice reviewers ?

Reviewers can't see if someone is repeating across HITs.

I think one of the things that confuses me is if he doesn't want any "disregard this email" answers, it should probably specify in the instructions that the link is needed *no matter what* and not just to verify that it's NOT you. I mean, otherwise *wouldn't* the acceptable response be "No, you're all set."?

I agree. Instructions still need work.

 

[LowCalCalzone]

from a reviewer standpoint, how would you know?

unless he is 100% trusting the hits to do the work

True. Just speaking with Eric it seems like this is a constant issue.

He needs to do what Kasistos do and not allow people to submit if a certain question/answer has been used already.