- Joined
- Jan 10, 2016
- Messages
- 46,637
- Reaction score
- 123,874
- Points
- 1,414
- Age
- 124
- Gender
- Female
Yes! Believe me, I'm as surprised as you are.You're alive
Yes! Believe me, I'm as surprised as you are.You're alive
Still time to delete it before @TQueen sees it. Just say you were abducted.Your HIT activity for this week:
- Number of HITs submitted: 736
Approvals and payments that occurred this week:
- Number of HITs approved: 738
- Number of HITs rejected: 0
- Bonus reward earned: $9.30
- HIT reward earned: $65.59
- Total Amount earned this week: $74.89
whoops
I made $12 this week. I think she's safe.Still time to delete it before @TQueen sees it. Just say you were abducted.
A retake block does not exist. That is a called a qualification. If a requester blocks you, they aren't just preventing you from retaking a particular survey, they are blocking you from all their HITs. Savvy requesters use qualifications to prevent one from retaking a particular survey.There is no debate about hard blocks and soft blocks... unless you want a flat earth debate. They don't exist.. those are terms turkers made up. There is only 1 way to block through both the web client and then api.
A "re-retakes" block is entirely deserved if you've taken the survey they don't want you to retake. That is an appropriate officially documented use of the system.
MTurk themselves recently posted an update on their blog saying not to block workers to prevent retakes:A retake block does not exist. That is a called a qualification. If a requester blocks you, they aren't just preventing you from retaking a particular survey, they are blocking you from all their HITs. Savvy requesters use qualifications to prevent one from retaking a particular survey.
Here is an archive of people getting warning messages from Amazon after what you call an appropriate use of the system: http://turkernation.com/archive/index.php/t-23339.html
One should not be getting an account suspension warning after correctly completing a survey. That's not appropriate.
MTurk themselves recently posted an update on their blog saying not to block workers to prevent retakes:
"A word of caution: MTurk has a built-in capability for a Requester to “block” a Worker from working on that Requester’s tasks in the future. Requesters use this capability to identify and exclude Workers that have consistently produced poor quality results on their tasks. We strongly urge Requesters to avoid using this feature to exclude Workers for convenience. Doing so could negatively impact the Worker’s reputation in MTurk."
https://blog.mturk.com/tutorial-bes...-surveys-or-longitudinal-studies-4d0732a7319b
"Worker customer"MTurk themselves recently posted an update on their blog saying not to block workers to prevent retakes:
"A word of caution: MTurk has a built-in capability for a Requester to “block” a Worker from working on that Requester’s tasks in the future. Requesters use this capability to identify and exclude Workers that have consistently produced poor quality results on their tasks. We strongly urge Requesters to avoid using this feature to exclude Workers for convenience. Doing so could negatively impact the Worker’s reputation in MTurk."
https://blog.mturk.com/tutorial-bes...-surveys-or-longitudinal-studies-4d0732a7319b
It differentiates you from a requester customer."Worker customer"
Meaning retake blocks have recently become a non-officially sanctioned practice... probably in favor of the *better* method turkers have been pushing to make standard practice for years.MTurk themselves recently posted an update on their blog saying not to block workers to prevent retakes:
"A word of caution: MTurk has a built-in capability for a Requester to “block” a Worker from working on that Requester’s tasks in the future. Requesters use this capability to identify and exclude Workers that have consistently produced poor quality results on their tasks. We strongly urge Requesters to avoid using this feature to exclude Workers for convenience. Doing so could negatively impact the Worker’s reputation in MTurk."
https://blog.mturk.com/tutorial-bes...-surveys-or-longitudinal-studies-4d0732a7319b
Exactly. If a requester clicks the "block" button, this message should pop up for them with this information and two buttons, one that says "yes, still block this person because they've consistently submitted poor quality work" and one that says, "no, please show me information on how to use qualifications to prevent retakes instead".
Oh Amazon.
Needs to be made more clear on the requester site.
I can't imagine that many requesters reading this blog.
They'd have to hire those engineers they should have hired the week they increased the fees but are still advertising for.Exactly. If a requester clicks the "block" button, this message should pop up for them with this information and two buttons, one that says "yes, still block this person because they've consistently submitted poor quality work" and one that says, "no, please show me information on how to use qualifications to prevent retakes instead".
Hey man... this is america. Raising their fees instantly raised the quality of the service.They'd have to hire those engineers they should have hired the week they increased the fees but are still advertising for.
The robots replacing the workers in Seattle agree with you.Hey man... this is america. Raising their fees instantly raised the quality of the service.